Just a reminder to not resort to personal attacks while debating.
u/CoolAsACucumber having made this post, you have the responsibility to patiently explain what this paper is about and what this twitter thread is saying (doesnt seem like an easy to understand thread).
u/MAG768720 has made good points, definitely needs debating, please do it without personal attacks.
There were some comments that got deleted by the filter due to word triggers. If you remove the uncalled for insults, I will be glad to undelete these comments.
The guy comes out asking a link to the paper so I gave him the abstract, then he goes on bitching about that the abstract has no references though the link I gave had in the middle of the screen "full text link pdf". Holy shit ok moron here is the full text link pdf.
He's trying to say that there is "no such things as covid" which is false. There absolutely was a sickness that affected people before the "vaccines". The flu doesn't cause persistent symptoms months after having it.
Hang in there fren, these are trying times for everyone, but the end of the tunnel is getting closer. Last part of the waiting is the hardest, but most satisfying.
I'm no expert or biochem guy so I'll do my best with their lingo.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR as in PCR testing for "diagnosing covid") is a DNA copy machine.
So I assume when they say
2/8- It demonstrates through elegant structl & biochem expmts what was observed with seq alignements (below): Large genome RNA virus RNA polymerases (eg. CoVs) evolved an active site adapted to increase speed yet maintain fidelity
They mean it in a way of replicating/evolving faster while still remaining stable organism.
3/8- It makes a clear connection between active site evolution of small genome RNA viruses (eg., enteroviruses) towards large genome RNA viruses (eg., CoVs). Swapping key active site residues confers the required properties to expand and maintain large RNA genomes.
So they are saying that this research gives clear insight into the areas that viruses actively evolve frrom including RNA ones like Coronaviruses (SARS-Cov-2 is one).
4/8- This work expands the seminal discoveries (12 years ago !) of the @PeersenLab about the specific fidelity check of viral RNA polymerases, which is totally different from that of DNA polymerases. A MUST read...
Apparently it expands research on evolutionary stability whereas prior research with RNA was only concerned with DNA
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR as in PCR testing for "diagnosing covid") is a DNA copy machine.
That is the claim ... but it might not actually be true. It might be simply creating material that did not previously exist, and not making copies of what already existed. And this from a soup of mixed genetic material, none of which is specifically identified via isolation and purification as a so-called "virus."
If you understood how PCR works, you would see the deception:
Done "in silico" (in a computer software program -- i.e. theoretical), and NOT done in physical reality.
while still remaining stable organism
Even virologists do not claim that a so-called "virus" is an "organism." It is not a living thing (which means it is not an organism) -- according to virologists.
So they are saying that this research gives clear insight into the areas that viruses actively evolve frrom including RNA ones like Coronaviruses (SARS-Cov-2 is one).
Sars 2 did not "evolve." It's so-called genome was computer-generated (not something physically observed in the real world), from Sars 1, which was also computer generated (not something physically observed in the real world), which in turn was computer-generated from something else that was not real.
Just a big ol' circle jerk of fake, computer-generated pretend stuff.
You stupid idiot I actually worked on the machines that used PCR to copy DNA for sequencing, years ago in a previous job.
And this from a soup of mixed genetic material
ALL GENETIC MATERIAL IS DNA OR RNA BASE PAIRS YOU FUCKING DIPSHIT WHICH IS WHAT PCR COPIES
Even virologists do not claim that a so-called "virus" is an "organism." It is not a living thing
IT HAS DNA OR RNA IN IT. ITS NOT CONSIDERED LIFE BECAUSE IT MUST HAVE A HOST IN ORDER TO LIVE AND CREATE NEW VIRUSES. A VIRUS CANNOT LIVE ON ITS OWN, ITS JUST A BLOB OF DNA OR RNA FLOATING AROUND UNTIL IT ATTACHES TO A CELL AND BEGINS TO MAKE COPIES.
You don't even know what a paper is supposed to look like.
No "Materials and Methods" section?
Of course not, because it is not a paper. But you don't understand that, do you?
The first sentence:
Positive-strand RNA viruses replicate their genomes using virally encoded RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRP) with a common active-site structure and closure mechanism upon which replication speed and fidelity can evolve to optimize virus fitness.
That is a supposed statement of fact. Notice, it has NO REFERENCE to back it up.
The same is true of every sentence in the paragraph. No references whatsoever. No research to back it up. Just baseless statements of opinion, not science.
This is not a research paper. It is propaganda.
And you don't know how to tell the difference, which is why you are gullible in believing someone's assertions with zero proof.
Holy shit idiot do you know what an abstract is? Learn about how published research papers are written you fucking moron.
It literally says full text link in the link I already gave. An abstract is just a summary of their findings. Its the appetizer thats tasted if someone wants to read further.
A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used
Do you know what that means? Explain.
to express codon optimized versions
Do you know what that means? Explain.
of the Wuhan-1 strain SARS-CoV-2 proteins
Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"
Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?
Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.
So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know.
The nsp8L7 fusion proteins were made by adding ...
Making proteins, not studying a virus.
They are supposedly (according to you) studying RNA virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which has anything at all to do with a "virus."
RNA is in a lot of things. In this case, bacteria.
See the problem?
It is all ASSUMED to be somehow related to RNA virus -- and that ain't science.
All proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus cells (Agilent Technologies) and grown
Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.
It is studying a mixture of genetic material.
A MIXTURE.
Harvested cells were lysed [broken apart] ... using a ... microfluidizer [machine] ... in a buffer containing [chemicals] ...
So ...
They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.
E Coli is bacteria, not virus.
They claim they can CREATE something "SIMILAR TO" SARS-CoV-2 from this method.
Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.
Why jump through all these hoops? Why not just get a sample of SARS-CoV-2 virus and go from there?
Oh ... because they CAN'T. More than 100 agencies and laboratories around the world ALL have stated on the record that ... NO SUCH SAMPLE EXISTS, ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
THAT ... is why they jump through these ridiculous hoops.
Then, they break what they have apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.
Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.
Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.
And they do it all with bacteria, no virus even included.
You are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).
In reality, it has nothing to do with the science of so-called virus.
Proteins from bacteria and other materials. So what?
Please tell me where I called it an "awesome paper". I am just sharing what I find from my sources and on this particular one I get a shitty trash replying back after I explicitly said in the first comment "I am not an expert".
A T7-based pET-26 plasmid with a N-terminal His8 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site was used
Dont know what it means and never professed I did.
to express codon optimized versions
Codon - A sequence of three adjacent nucleotides constituting the genetic code that determines the insertion of a specific amino acid in a polypeptide chain during protein synthesis or the signal to stop protein synthesis.
Yes they are playing around with the amino acid proteins in here.
Coronaviruses (CoV) form large multicomponent RNA replication-transcription complexes containing a core RNA synthesis machine made of the nsp12 RdRP protein with one nsp7 and two nsp8 proteins as essential subunits required for activity. We show that assembly of this complex can be accelerated 5-fold by preincubation of nsp12 with nsp8 and further optimized with the use of a novel nsp8L7 heterodimer fusion protein construct.
All proteins used in this study were expressed in Escherichia coli using T7 promoters and purified through metal-affinity, ion-exchange, and size-exclusion chromatography (Fig. 2A).
So they are genetically modifying proteins in E Coli to mimic those of SARS-Cov-2 to understand their mechanism. This very common and much easier way to experiment than with an actual virus that includes all the extra biosafety regulations and costs. In the end you still just want to understand the pieces that make the virus work.
The virus is not a flu, the genes have been sequenced and it was even shown that Modern a had patented sequences of its genes back in 2017. These patented genes do not show up naturally in any form of life prior to the pandemic. This is interesting if you take into account of Monsanto GMO patent court cases in the past, it means Moderna owns SARS-Cov-2 and all the damage that comes with it. You can prove this for yourself with BLAST, I will go find the past article and send if you want.
Please tell me where I called it an "awesome paper".
Read the title of YOUR thread.
Dont know what it means and never professed I did.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
So they are genetically modifying proteins in E Coli to mimic those of SARS-Cov-2
And THAT is a BIG problem.
E Coli is bacteria, nothing to do with virus.
Why not just start with the DAMN VIRUS?
Because they can't.
Why can't they?
Because a sample of the virus ... DOES NOT EXIST IN ANY LAB ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
That's a bit of a problem ...
In the end you still just want to understand the pieces that make the virus work.
Wrong.
FIRST, it must be established that a virus ... EXISTS.
NEXT, we take it apart to look at ITS proteins -- not the proteins of something ELSE.
THEN ... MAYBE we can arrive at some conclusions.
Not before.
The virus is not a flu, the genes have been sequenced
False. The "genetic sequence" was generated via computer program, NOT from a real, physical thing in the real, physical world. ALL done inside a virtual computer software program. ALL of it.
I could also generate a genomic sequence of a unicorn. Would you insist that I FIRST show you a real unicorn, take genetic material from that unicorn, and do a genetic sequence from THAT real, physical thing?
You SHOULD.
If not, then you are not following science, only dogma.
Virologists have NEVER taken a genetic sequence from a real, physical "virus."
Always done via computer software program ... ONLY.
Modern a had patented sequences ...
Again, ALL MADE UP BY A COMPUTER PROGRAM.
They NEVER had a real sample of it -- because there isn't one!
... back in 2017
That's because the SARS 2 was made from SARS 1 (2003), BOTH from a computer program and NOT from a real, physical thing existing in the real, three dimensional world.
THIS IS WHY THEY MUST USE THESE "SURROGATE" EXPERIMENTS, and NOT use the "real virus" -- which DOES NOT EXIST.
Moderna owns SARS-Cov-2 and all the damage that comes with it.
There is no damage from something that does not exist.
But Moderna DOES own the vaccines, which are harmful drugs, and the executives and "scientists" at Moderna should be prosecuted for their crimes.
You can prove this for yourself with BLAST, I will go find the past article and send if you want.
No, because you continue to IGNORE the evidence that ALL of this is made up nonsense.
I could send you pictures of unicorns, if you want.
This is a quote from the Twitter post. Not my words. I'm doing my rounds of posting any research posted by my sources. I'm not hand making every single title, I'm providing the information here so other people can see it if they want to.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
I literally said that in my first comment on this thread that I'm no expert you fucking trash.
BECAUSE ITS FUCKING EXPENSIVE AND REQUIRES A LEVEL 4 LAB WHEN ALL THEY ARE DOING IS FIGURING OUT THE MECHANISM OF PROTEINS AND GENE SEQUENCES THAT MAKE UP THE VIRUS. THE MECHANISM WORKS THE SAME E COLI OR ANY OTHER CELL BUT E COLI IS CHEAP AND EASY TO WORK WITH.
False. The "genetic sequence" was generated via computer program, NOT from a real, physical thing in the real, physical world. ALL done inside a virtual computer software program. ALL of it.
I could also generate a genomic sequence of a unicorn. Would you insist that I FIRST show you a real unicorn, take genetic material from that unicorn, and do a genetic sequence from THAT real, physical thing?
Covid Origins Smoking Gun
How to BLAST your way to the truth about the origins of COVID-19
BLAST Search Results.Replicate and find the CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Moderna synthetic genome patents and link to Covid. WO2020 and WO2021 and their patents are related to after the Sars-Cov-2 outbreak (2020 and thereafter) and can be dismissed. Interestingly, this sequence doesn't show up in natural life at all before Covid-19, only shows in Moderna patents, and the gene is involved in the virus invading the human cell
@_Bilbobagga
Previous court case has ruled if your patent is found in something you own it. With a 2017 Moderna patent found in COVID-19 genome, Moderna can be found responsible for COVID-19! Lucky they have made billions off the vaccine for the virus they created, might need it and more!
No flu permanently takes away your sense of smell or taste. Covid-19 does in rare cases. I'm not aware of any flu that that takes away your sense 6 months after symptoms first occur. It's a fucking real virus and it was genetically engineered but stupidly. The Furin Cleavage Site (FCS) is the key to this, the FCS did not occur naturally and is what allows the virus to enter human cells.
There are level 4 labs that do handle SARS-Cov-2 and Coronaviruses. Again VERY FUCKING EXPENSIVE to handle for understanding every protein and gene sequence so it's not done as often.
There is a real virus people get sick off of. Other people around them get sick after they get sick. Take Ivermectin (which is anti-viral) and everything is fine. Go to Conspiracies.win if you think there is no SARS-Cov-2 virus, it has been sequenced by multiple 3rd parties since the initial Illumina 4chan threads were made
Just a reminder to not resort to personal attacks while debating.
u/CoolAsACucumber having made this post, you have the responsibility to patiently explain what this paper is about and what this twitter thread is saying (doesnt seem like an easy to understand thread).
u/MAG768720 has made good points, definitely needs debating, please do it without personal attacks.
There were some comments that got deleted by the filter due to word triggers. If you remove the uncalled for insults, I will be glad to undelete these comments.
The guy comes out asking a link to the paper so I gave him the abstract, then he goes on bitching about that the abstract has no references though the link I gave had in the middle of the screen "full text link pdf". Holy shit ok moron here is the full text link pdf.
He's trying to say that there is "no such things as covid" which is false. There absolutely was a sickness that affected people before the "vaccines". The flu doesn't cause persistent symptoms months after having it.
All this is worth discussing without getting frustrated.
I'm frustrated with my life and it's leaking on here.
You're right though.
Hang in there fren, these are trying times for everyone, but the end of the tunnel is getting closer. Last part of the waiting is the hardest, but most satisfying.
Tldr translation please?
I'm no expert or biochem guy so I'll do my best with their lingo.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR as in PCR testing for "diagnosing covid") is a DNA copy machine.
So I assume when they say
They mean it in a way of replicating/evolving faster while still remaining stable organism.
So they are saying that this research gives clear insight into the areas that viruses actively evolve frrom including RNA ones like Coronaviruses (SARS-Cov-2 is one).
Apparently it expands research on evolutionary stability whereas prior research with RNA was only concerned with DNA
Very good, thank you!
That is the claim ... but it might not actually be true. It might be simply creating material that did not previously exist, and not making copies of what already existed. And this from a soup of mixed genetic material, none of which is specifically identified via isolation and purification as a so-called "virus."
If you understood how PCR works, you would see the deception:
https://rumble.com/v1helnt-everything-you-need-to-know-about-pcr-tests-tom-cowan.html
Done "in silico" (in a computer software program -- i.e. theoretical), and NOT done in physical reality.
Even virologists do not claim that a so-called "virus" is an "organism." It is not a living thing (which means it is not an organism) -- according to virologists.
Sars 2 did not "evolve." It's so-called genome was computer-generated (not something physically observed in the real world), from Sars 1, which was also computer generated (not something physically observed in the real world), which in turn was computer-generated from something else that was not real.
Just a big ol' circle jerk of fake, computer-generated pretend stuff.
Maybe they will make a unicorn genome next!
You stupid idiot I actually worked on the machines that used PCR to copy DNA for sequencing, years ago in a previous job.
ALL GENETIC MATERIAL IS DNA OR RNA BASE PAIRS YOU FUCKING DIPSHIT WHICH IS WHAT PCR COPIES
IT HAS DNA OR RNA IN IT. ITS NOT CONSIDERED LIFE BECAUSE IT MUST HAVE A HOST IN ORDER TO LIVE AND CREATE NEW VIRUSES. A VIRUS CANNOT LIVE ON ITS OWN, ITS JUST A BLOB OF DNA OR RNA FLOATING AROUND UNTIL IT ATTACHES TO A CELL AND BEGINS TO MAKE COPIES.
Nitter Archive:
https://archive.ph/h8bz3
Show me a link to the actual paper (not just Bruno's nonsensical take of it), and I will show you why Bruno has no clue what he is talking about.
You couldn't even be bothered to look it up yourself. Makes you even more unreliable.
The SARS-CoV nsp12 Polymerase Active Site Is Tuned for Large-Genome Replication
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35924919/
EDIT: THIS FUCKING IDIOT DOESNT EVEN KNOW WHAT AN ABSTRACT IS IN A RESEARCH PAPER 🤣 WHO GAVE THIS GUY A PEPE?
Is that the ENTIRE paper?
A single paragraph?
Talk about unreliable ...
You don't even know what a paper is supposed to look like.
No "Materials and Methods" section?
Of course not, because it is not a paper. But you don't understand that, do you?
The first sentence:
That is a supposed statement of fact. Notice, it has NO REFERENCE to back it up.
The same is true of every sentence in the paragraph. No references whatsoever. No research to back it up. Just baseless statements of opinion, not science.
This is not a research paper. It is propaganda.
And you don't know how to tell the difference, which is why you are gullible in believing someone's assertions with zero proof.
Holy shit idiot do you know what an abstract is? Learn about how published research papers are written you fucking moron.
It literally says full text link in the link I already gave. An abstract is just a summary of their findings. Its the appetizer thats tasted if someone wants to read further.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/35924919/
OK ... let's see how much you understand.
Go to "Materials and Methods."
Do you know what that means? Explain.
Do you know what that means? Explain.
Why the proteins, and NOT the "virus?"
Do you know where those proteins came from? Do you know what was MIXED with what, and which proteins were being observed?
Right off the bat, we know they were NOT looking at a "virus," but rather at proteins.
So ... WHICH proteins would be an important thing to know.
Making proteins, not studying a virus.
They are supposedly (according to you) studying RNA virus, using PCR, and yet they are actually looking at proteins -- that were made from a MIXTURE of material, none of which has anything at all to do with a "virus."
RNA is in a lot of things. In this case, bacteria.
See the problem?
It is all ASSUMED to be somehow related to RNA virus -- and that ain't science.
Mixing with E. Coli is not studying a virus.
It is studying a mixture of genetic material.
A MIXTURE.
So ...
They are taking proteins from E. Coli -- NOT FROM SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS.
E Coli is bacteria, not virus.
They claim they can CREATE something "SIMILAR TO" SARS-CoV-2 from this method.
Notice ... they are NOT STARTING WITH A SARS VIRUS.
Why jump through all these hoops? Why not just get a sample of SARS-CoV-2 virus and go from there?
Oh ... because they CAN'T. More than 100 agencies and laboratories around the world ALL have stated on the record that ... NO SUCH SAMPLE EXISTS, ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
THAT ... is why they jump through these ridiculous hoops.
Then, they break what they have apart by ADDING CHEMICALS.
Then, they centrifuge and claim they have something worth looking at.
Finally, they draw conclusions about "RNA Virus" based on this MIXTURE of materials that includes CHEMICALS that would not exist inside the body ... if the virus existed.
And they do it all with bacteria, no virus even included.
You are claiming this has some sort of great "proof" related to genomic sequencing and SARS and Covid (ultimately).
In reality, it has nothing to do with the science of so-called virus.
Proteins from bacteria and other materials. So what?
You call it an "awesome paper."
It is garbage.
Please tell me where I called it an "awesome paper". I am just sharing what I find from my sources and on this particular one I get a shitty trash replying back after I explicitly said in the first comment "I am not an expert".
Dont know what it means and never professed I did.
Codon - A sequence of three adjacent nucleotides constituting the genetic code that determines the insertion of a specific amino acid in a polypeptide chain during protein synthesis or the signal to stop protein synthesis.
Yes they are playing around with the amino acid proteins in here.
So they are genetically modifying proteins in E Coli to mimic those of SARS-Cov-2 to understand their mechanism. This very common and much easier way to experiment than with an actual virus that includes all the extra biosafety regulations and costs. In the end you still just want to understand the pieces that make the virus work.
The virus is not a flu, the genes have been sequenced and it was even shown that Modern a had patented sequences of its genes back in 2017. These patented genes do not show up naturally in any form of life prior to the pandemic. This is interesting if you take into account of Monsanto GMO patent court cases in the past, it means Moderna owns SARS-Cov-2 and all the damage that comes with it. You can prove this for yourself with BLAST, I will go find the past article and send if you want.
Read the title of YOUR thread.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
And THAT is a BIG problem.
E Coli is bacteria, nothing to do with virus.
Why not just start with the DAMN VIRUS?
Because they can't.
Why can't they?
Because a sample of the virus ... DOES NOT EXIST IN ANY LAB ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
That's a bit of a problem ...
Wrong.
FIRST, it must be established that a virus ... EXISTS.
NEXT, we take it apart to look at ITS proteins -- not the proteins of something ELSE.
THEN ... MAYBE we can arrive at some conclusions.
Not before.
False. The "genetic sequence" was generated via computer program, NOT from a real, physical thing in the real, physical world. ALL done inside a virtual computer software program. ALL of it.
I could also generate a genomic sequence of a unicorn. Would you insist that I FIRST show you a real unicorn, take genetic material from that unicorn, and do a genetic sequence from THAT real, physical thing?
You SHOULD.
If not, then you are not following science, only dogma.
Virologists have NEVER taken a genetic sequence from a real, physical "virus."
Always done via computer software program ... ONLY.
Again, ALL MADE UP BY A COMPUTER PROGRAM.
They NEVER had a real sample of it -- because there isn't one!
That's because the SARS 2 was made from SARS 1 (2003), BOTH from a computer program and NOT from a real, physical thing existing in the real, three dimensional world.
THIS IS WHY THEY MUST USE THESE "SURROGATE" EXPERIMENTS, and NOT use the "real virus" -- which DOES NOT EXIST.
There is no damage from something that does not exist.
But Moderna DOES own the vaccines, which are harmful drugs, and the executives and "scientists" at Moderna should be prosecuted for their crimes.
No, because you continue to IGNORE the evidence that ALL of this is made up nonsense.
I could send you pictures of unicorns, if you want.
This is a quote from the Twitter post. Not my words. I'm doing my rounds of posting any research posted by my sources. I'm not hand making every single title, I'm providing the information here so other people can see it if they want to.
I literally said that in my first comment on this thread that I'm no expert you fucking trash.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTyU37T9/x/c/4OdgvYnlGxI
BECAUSE ITS FUCKING EXPENSIVE AND REQUIRES A LEVEL 4 LAB WHEN ALL THEY ARE DOING IS FIGURING OUT THE MECHANISM OF PROTEINS AND GENE SEQUENCES THAT MAKE UP THE VIRUS. THE MECHANISM WORKS THE SAME E COLI OR ANY OTHER CELL BUT E COLI IS CHEAP AND EASY TO WORK WITH.
Covid Origins Smoking Gun
How to BLAST your way to the truth about the origins of COVID-19
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/how-to-blast-your-way-to-the-truth
https://archive.fo/xj5xk (edited)
BLAST Search Results.Replicate and find the CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Moderna synthetic genome patents and link to Covid. WO2020 and WO2021 and their patents are related to after the Sars-Cov-2 outbreak (2020 and thereafter) and can be dismissed. Interestingly, this sequence doesn't show up in natural life at all before Covid-19, only shows in Moderna patents, and the gene is involved in the virus invading the human cell
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
@JikkyKjj Who owns #SARSCoV2?
If there is a contaminant that is patented, the patent owner owns it.
If you own something that harms someone else, what happens?
Monsanto may have dropped #BigPharma into the biggest pile of BatPile of pooin criminal history. #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
https://twitter.com/the_coopertron/status/1482702820293988353
https://archive.ph/D5Q64
@_Bilbobagga Previous court case has ruled if your patent is found in something you own it. With a 2017 Moderna patent found in COVID-19 genome, Moderna can be found responsible for COVID-19! Lucky they have made billions off the vaccine for the virus they created, might need it and more!
https://twitter.com/_Bilbobagga/status/1482662636005519360?s=20
https://archive.ph/q0u1n
No flu permanently takes away your sense of smell or taste. Covid-19 does in rare cases. I'm not aware of any flu that that takes away your sense 6 months after symptoms first occur. It's a fucking real virus and it was genetically engineered but stupidly. The Furin Cleavage Site (FCS) is the key to this, the FCS did not occur naturally and is what allows the virus to enter human cells.
There are level 4 labs that do handle SARS-Cov-2 and Coronaviruses. Again VERY FUCKING EXPENSIVE to handle for understanding every protein and gene sequence so it's not done as often.
There is a real virus people get sick off of. Other people around them get sick after they get sick. Take Ivermectin (which is anti-viral) and everything is fine. Go to Conspiracies.win if you think there is no SARS-Cov-2 virus, it has been sequenced by multiple 3rd parties since the initial Illumina 4chan threads were made
https://archive.ph/wefGD
https://archive.ph/NfFW2
https://archive.is/O2oxl
https://archive.ph/93JkP