9/11 truth isn’t gonna go away until it is revealed …
That’s some neatly cut steel you got there … 🧐
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (49)
sorted by:
YEP....and look at the angle of the cut...AND also the slag on the front. That is caused by "extreme heat" TO turn steel to slag. The ANGLE cut is so that the upper portion "SLIDES" of the bottom...which "weakens" THAT column and cause(s) massive failure...Look at the column in front and the "jagged" edge!!!!!
Good Catch on the picture...MOST people would not have stopped and given it a second thought...
EXACTLY what I was going to say. Thank you for saying it better.
Looks like a photoshop of that portion of the photo to me. Is there a link to the image? I couldn't find it when searching.
https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/core-columns-world-trade-center-cut-45-degree-angle-prior-coming-911/
DAMN PURKISs!!!!!! You rock the socks off this ol' jock!!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Glad you had back up...
Mech. Eng...worked in the OIL Business and then hehehehehe... DOWN HOLE EXPLOSIVE DESIGNER....making thangs go boom in a pipe!!!!
But what is the source of the image in that article? Most of the 9/11 images are searchable, but I couldn't find this one. The two explanations are, 1) the image has been scrubbed because it showed the 45-degree cut, or 2) the image is out there, without the 45-degree cut, but from some obscure image set that doesn't show up in an image search. I searched the Google images using "firemen at WTC wreckage" and variations of that, but couldn't find it (after wading through 100s of images)
IMO, its been 'disappeared"...There is far too much evidence to suggest anything else than this was an "Inside job"...None of their explanations makes sense..Not physical possible...One of the best was finding a "passport" of one of the hijackers ONE block away from ground Zero completely untouched yet everything around it was incinerated...Give me a break..That's just one example out of hundreds...
Not just that. The story of how it made its way into the hands of authorities is completely unbelievable.
After the first tower was hit, there was pandemonium in the streets of Manhattan. The tallest building in the city was on fire, billowing out paper and smoke - and all first responders were mobilized to the scene.
An unnamed, innocent bystander found the passport (in near pristine condition) amidst the chaos, immediately thought it was significant to the event, and handed it to the nearest police officer.
Further stretching this story: after the passport was handed off, the second tower was hit, and both towers collapsed. But somehow, the police officer had the wherewithal to a) not die; b) hold on tot he passport and; c) give the passport to the FBI within 24 hours.
More interesting: the innocent bystander has never come forward to take credit for his incredible find, and neither has the police officer.
👌👌
I don't know you're being downvoted, you're absolutely right.
People getting sick from radiation poisoning would have gotten out.
People did get sick. They developed cancer even. They just blamed it on asbestos. Why do you think the FBI showed up wearing full hazmats suits with facemasks that were duct-taped shut?
https://sophias-correction.weebly.com/wtc-nuclear-demolition.html
To play devil's advocate, I'm sure there were reasons its use was banned, and why it's considered a public health hazard, requiring special equipment to clean it out. Still, radiation poisoning would get out.
For sure, asbestos is bad and causes all sorts of issues. But the cancer that the first responders developed was as a result of the (controlled) nuclear demolition. I highly recommend reading that article, it has a lot of very interesting facts that most people are unaware of.
Asbestos takes about 30 yrs to turn to cancer. At least that is what I was taught in my asbestos training.
IIRC, the fires at Ground Zero did not go out until January 2002 - surviving drenching rains, and a NYC winter. Those fires generated lots of heat and were producing melted steel for 3+ months.
At the time, the narrative was that the firs kept finding more fuel in the parking garage, where they would ignite the cars. Except - most of those cars were recovered, with their gas tanks intact.
You hear yourself when you talk right?
Dustification.
Exactly....
NOW your getting the picture...here is a youtube link (😔 apologize for youtube) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj0YQ4SsjEs
and goto to the :22 second or play from the first ... I am showing this because this is EXACTLY how one would bring down a building WITHIN IT'S OWN FOOT PRINT...
AND WATCH THE DEBRIS FIELD!!!! (the stuff that is within the building parimeter)
This has been debunked. There is literally a video of this EXACT steel beam being cut.
https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/core-columns-world-trade-center-cut-45-degree-angle-prior-coming-911/
I'm not buying into the planes. It is impossible for planes to not break apart when hitting any solid object. Even big birds have crushed passenger planes.
I don't buy into the official narrative of the plane, that is for sure.
The last I saw, the theory is that most of the plane's body stayed inside the tower after impact. Reason: the tower was not solid, and simply shredded the plane as it entered - like a cheese grater.
The plane body, being made of aluminum, provided a source of fuel for the fires. Aluminum has a much lower melting point than steel - and the molten metal we see spewing out of the building was the molten aluminum. These fires weakened (didn't melt) the steel of the building, and caused its collapse.
Here are the problems with that scenario:
On impact, it is safe to assume that most of the jet fuel was consumed. Yes, it caused fires in the building - but did so across multiple floors. Some big, some small. It wasn't one raging, monster, isolated fire. More on this at #6
It is difficult to envision most of the plane remaining intact after hitting a steel frame building at 500 MPH. The building was only ~ 1 acre wide and we saw major pieces of the plane get ejected from the building. To be fair, let's assume 50% of the plane was vaporized on impact - leaving 50% in the building.
Now the question is - can ordinary fires of office furniture heat aluminum to the point where it melts? Maybe. But what are the chances that the fires met the shredded aluminum with such regularity that it melted? I'd venture close to zero.
Even if aluminum was melting - it does so at 1200F. That does not explain the melting of the steel beams and trusses (which melt at 2500F).
Metal is resilient. When heated, it will dissipate the heat to the coldest ends of the metal. It takes a great deal of heat and time to melt metal in an uncontrolled environment. The steel in the WTC melted in 90 minutes.
If you listen to the radio calls from firefighters in the building, they clearly say "We have isolated pockets of fire that we can knock down. Send up X guys with a line." Does that sound like a raging fire that was hitting 2500F? No. To be fair, let's assume most of the fires couldn't be put out with a small crew. But their observation tells us that a systemic weakening of the metal occurring on multiple floors just wasn't happening the way we've been led to believe. Small fires do not weaken steel.
But let's assume everything in the official narrative is correct. You have two buildings hit in two completely different angles. That means the fires were different. The structure damage was different. The weight distribution was different. How could it be that both buildings failed - and fell - in the exact same way? And while we're at it - how could it be that WTC 7 failed and fell in the same way as WTC 1 & 2?
You brought up a good point. Building 7 which was not hit fell the same way. Like a demolition. With my eyes watching "the video" the entire plane penetrated from the nose to the wing tips an outer steel reinforced building with nothing visual falling off the plane. That's what I see from my perspective. If you take away the existence of CGI or blue beam your rationale makes sense.
Maybe when this mission is over the Patriots will tell us the who, the why and the how. Along with so many other deceptions the world needs to know.
Personally I want vindication for all the people I red pilled that thought I was a nutty conspiracy theorist.
The more truth that comes into my life the greater the burden. Thankfully there are people out there that are wide awake and like a sponge looking to soak up truth.
Did some work for a nice couple yesterday that I need to email them some Intel. The guy took all his cash out of the bank and converted it to gold and silver and made his wife/girlfriend do the same.
My feeling is if they steal everyone's cash we are all screwed anyways.
Not the plane itself, but definitely the nose cone.
The USAF used to use "chicken guns" to shoot chickens at planes to simulate bird strikes (no idea if they still do). The Brits thought that was a cool idea and built one themselves. They had a BIG problem though, the chickens were blowing right through the windows, nosecones, literally anything they hit. They called the guys in the USAF and asked what was going wrong. The response was, "Thaw chickens first". Now if a fucking frozen chicken is blowing holes through airplanes, imagine what inches thick steel beams that out-mass the chickens by multiple orders of magnitude would do.
Post the sauce for your claim.
LOL! So where is this "debunked proof"? If you're going to say the word "debunked" you damn well be ready to back it up!
Just got off of Handshake... thinking 911 was legit. Interesting
I was a few blocks away. We all heard what sounded like an explosion there 15 minutes before the first tower came down. Everyone on Broadway in front of City Hall turned at once and ran in panic. It was unmistakable.
Workers in the basement of the building swear they heard explosions in the basement well before the plane hit the tower.
IIRC, there is even audio of a business meeting a few blocks away where people comment "What was that noise? Sounded like an explosion" well before the plane hit.
Yes. many did, even in the pit months after the collapse.
Critical thought, people. If I'm a firefighter digging through that rubble and I have a beam swaying, say, 30 feet overhead, I'm sure gonna want that beam cut down so that I can work under it safely.
I'm open to the idea that 9/11 is not as advertised, but posts like this make us all look stupid.
I see applying logic is getting downvotes. Please, oh please, do not take away my fake internet points.
Does it look like that beam was 'swaying' overhead??... All the beams I've seen cut at that angle were Vertical ...None were 'swaying"... You are quite entitled to your opinion but please don't insult my/our intelligence...
Nearly every single beam has been cut Horizontily bar a few...Go look at any of the hundreds of photos of ground zero after the collapse...
I don't need to insult anyone's intelligence, it generally speaks for itself.
If I'm a guy with a torch trying to improve the safety of the area and I want to make the structurally unsound beam fall in a specific controlled direction, that's exactly how I would cut it. Perhaps other beams were in a position to be lifted instead and so a horizontal cut made more sense.
I guarantee if that beam had been cut dozens of stories up and then fallen into that position, there wouldn't be any slag stuck to it. That stuff can be knocked off with a hammer (I have some experience in this area), it would never survive forces that can pulverize concrete, and it certainly wouldn't be clean, it would be covered with dust and rust like everything else even if it had survived the fall.
No, that beam was cut where it stood. Using this photo as evidence of 9/11 malfeasance does nothing but undermine the position because the visual is easily understood by anybody who knows what they're talking about. Critical thinking and some real-world understanding are what I'm arguing for here.
To be fair - we don't know where that beam came from. It could have been ground level, which means it would retain slag. Also, I think the workers were more interested in heavy duty excavation - not finesse work.
Not beating you up or anything. Just laying it out there.
It makes sense to me to think that the first priority was the safety of the rescuers picking their way through the rubble. With hundreds of tons of pick-up sticks stacked precariously above and the hope of survivors underneath, finesse work is exactly what would have been called for.
Also, note the lack of rust on the slag and the cut. If that cut had been done before the collapse, they would have been sprayed with water like everything else and would have rusted like everything else. But they are clean. That cut was made after the area was deluged.
Who is Barry Jennings?
Mr Jennings was a whistleblower who was inside WTC building 7 on 9/11. He reported multiple explosions before the building fell. He reported that the lobby was completely blown out and that he had to step over dead bodies on the way out of the building.
Barry was an outspoken leader in the 9/11 movement when it first started. He mysteriously died after a few years of speaking out.
Ill provide his video account once its finished uploading...
To be honest, how could you "happen" upon jet fuel?