The problem with this theory is that it would directly contradict the well established and accepted axiom we all know to be true: that Donald J Trump is currently and has since 2016 been the President of the United States of America. If we have to wait until a new DOJ is installed, that would mean Trump and the Patriots aren’t in control. It just makes no sense. Sorry to burst your bubble bud.
You have not done your homework on devolution. Trump is a president in exile. He still controls the military. He let the deep state steal the election. By doing so he knew they would try to destroy the country. The military stands in wait, ready to step in at any point to stop any massive societal destruction. Everything is being documented and their crimes will be prosecuted when this charade is over.
Biden is essentially in control of the corporation, Trump still holds power over the Republic. If you read anything on the Law of War you would know there is a occupying force (Biden) and a occupied territory: Trump still holds control of the territory.
Devolution is speculation. It is not fact. At least one of the mods is struggling with that distinction so you're by no means alone. But the fact remains, we can't state theories as facts when we can't back them up with proof.
Devolution is the only scenario that explains our current situation and it is the most agreed upon scenario at that. I can state all the theories I want to, that is what we do here. Throw out theories and discuss them. Every Q drop is a theory.
When I told ruralfarmer to do some homework on devolution, I thought it would help him understand how Trump could be in control with some aspects and not have any control over others.
I think Trump is still in control because he is controlling the military. If Trump asked the military to bring this movie to an end today, the military would do so. However, at the same time Biden is in control in DC and trying to exact his control over the rest of the country. Many judges have stopped him with constitutionality conflicts.
Do you have proof we are not in devolution? No? We as a group tend to believe it is fact. If we threw out everything except the facts, we would have very little conversation taking place.
I don't even know where to begin. Are you familiar with the phrase "proving a negative"?
I'd like to believe devolution is real. We all do. But it is nothing more than theory with circumstantial evidence supporting it. It cannot be posited as fact.
"We as a group tend to believe it is fact."
Then it's a group of fools. We must be able to distinguish between theory and provable facts.
I am hopeful that Devolution is correct. But we must think critically. We win by converting normies and to do so, that means showing them facts and data. We lose by overstating our argument, by positing theory as fact.
"If we threw out everything except the facts, we would have very little conversation taking place."
No one is asserting that we throw out theories. No one is asking anyone on this board to not speculate. But there is an enormous distinction between theories/speculation and FACTS. You attempted to refute someone else's statement by stating a theory as fact. This accomplishes nothing other than making you feel good. The goal of everyone on this board should be to save the Republic. We save the Republic by creating a critical mass of awakened individuals who are aware of facts and truth. We repel the potentially awakened by stating theories as fact.
We are at the end of the biggest Psi-op in human history.
It's quaint that you think you have access to hard facts on anything, or there is anything you can cite with certainty at the moment.
Speculation is the only "field of operations" we have for now and you should acknowledge this as one of the few "facts" available to us at this time.
We know that we don't know. This makes informed speculation one of the most powerful tools we have.
It says that it is speculation many times right in the 23 parts of devolution. People who forget this may need to be reminded but doing so repeatedly just imbues your posts with a shit energy.
When you put together a meticulously researched theory like devolution replete with 23+ parts and supporting documents and citations, I will be sure to remind you that it is just speculation. It is needlessly dismissive and undercuts the fact that this model fits the data. This is the best working theory that we have.
Edit:- Facts and data have absolutely no effect on normies whatsoever and it is not up to us to wake them up. They will suck the choad of their own ignorance in October.
I never stated any facts. He said, "It just makes no sense". I said do some homework on devolution and then tried to briefly explain it to him.
If someone says I don't understand, how do I lead him in a direction where he could understand? Maybe I should have said good luck finding the truth?
You are contradicting yourself.
"We save the Republic by creating a critical mass of awakened individuals who are aware of facts and truth."
If they can't understand something, the next step would be to lead them in a direction to understand it, like I did. Is that not what you are suggesting? How do they get awakened without showing them?
Proving a negative: proving the non - existence of that for which no evidence of any kind exists.
No, this is what you said. You chided the guy for not doing his "homework" on devolution, then stated the tenants of devolution as fact. Re-read your own post:
"You have not done your homework on devolution. Trump is a president in exile. He still controls the military. He let the deep state steal the election. By doing so he knew they would try to destroy the country. The military stands in wait, ready to step in at any point to stop any massive societal destruction. Everything is being documented and their crimes will be prosecuted when this charade is over."
I swear, I don't know if some of you are shills here to destroy this board or if it's just a matter of not being able to separate fact from theory. It's really tough to determine which is which sometimes.
The investigation part is over. Now the ass reaming begins.
Fake news to get past midterms. Then more fake news.
lol
I have always thought that these grand juries started several years ago.
This plays into the future proves past phrase.
There is no video from these grand juries, only sketches.
Publicly released news is gathered from court filings from Durham.
What we learn today could be from a GJ from years ago.
Timing is everything.
The grand jury either finds the person guilty or innocent.
The grand jury decides if the person should be convicted.
The conviction is sent to the DOJ who hands down the punishment.
Would we want Durham's report or recommendations going to the current DOJ?
I think we would want Durham's report coming out after MAGA has control.
When MAGA takes control of the house and senate, could they influence the decisions of the DOJ? I don't know.
Could it mean that between now and then, Biden is proven to be a fraud and DJT takes control? This would give us a new DOJ.
Red October is coming.
Lots of evidence has been building for years.
Lots of variables are still in the air.
If all the evidence comes out in October, we take back both houses, many resolutions will be passed to clean up this mess.
It would be political suicidal to vote against necessary resolutions given the big evidence dump from October.
MAGA would have full congressional control.
I think a two-thirds majority vote in both the House and the Senate can overturn Presidential dictates.
Grand jurys don't find anyone guilty or innocent.
This.
The problem with this theory is that it would directly contradict the well established and accepted axiom we all know to be true: that Donald J Trump is currently and has since 2016 been the President of the United States of America. If we have to wait until a new DOJ is installed, that would mean Trump and the Patriots aren’t in control. It just makes no sense. Sorry to burst your bubble bud.
You have not done your homework on devolution. Trump is a president in exile. He still controls the military. He let the deep state steal the election. By doing so he knew they would try to destroy the country. The military stands in wait, ready to step in at any point to stop any massive societal destruction. Everything is being documented and their crimes will be prosecuted when this charade is over.
Biden is essentially in control of the corporation, Trump still holds power over the Republic. If you read anything on the Law of War you would know there is a occupying force (Biden) and a occupied territory: Trump still holds control of the territory.
Devolution is speculation. It is not fact. At least one of the mods is struggling with that distinction so you're by no means alone. But the fact remains, we can't state theories as facts when we can't back them up with proof.
Devolution is the only scenario that explains our current situation and it is the most agreed upon scenario at that. I can state all the theories I want to, that is what we do here. Throw out theories and discuss them. Every Q drop is a theory.
When I told ruralfarmer to do some homework on devolution, I thought it would help him understand how Trump could be in control with some aspects and not have any control over others.
I think Trump is still in control because he is controlling the military. If Trump asked the military to bring this movie to an end today, the military would do so. However, at the same time Biden is in control in DC and trying to exact his control over the rest of the country. Many judges have stopped him with constitutionality conflicts.
Do you have proof we are not in devolution? No? We as a group tend to believe it is fact. If we threw out everything except the facts, we would have very little conversation taking place.
"Do you have proof we are not in devolution?"
I don't even know where to begin. Are you familiar with the phrase "proving a negative"?
I'd like to believe devolution is real. We all do. But it is nothing more than theory with circumstantial evidence supporting it. It cannot be posited as fact.
"We as a group tend to believe it is fact." Then it's a group of fools. We must be able to distinguish between theory and provable facts.
I am hopeful that Devolution is correct. But we must think critically. We win by converting normies and to do so, that means showing them facts and data. We lose by overstating our argument, by positing theory as fact.
"If we threw out everything except the facts, we would have very little conversation taking place."
No one is asserting that we throw out theories. No one is asking anyone on this board to not speculate. But there is an enormous distinction between theories/speculation and FACTS. You attempted to refute someone else's statement by stating a theory as fact. This accomplishes nothing other than making you feel good. The goal of everyone on this board should be to save the Republic. We save the Republic by creating a critical mass of awakened individuals who are aware of facts and truth. We repel the potentially awakened by stating theories as fact.
We are at the end of the biggest Psi-op in human history.
It's quaint that you think you have access to hard facts on anything, or there is anything you can cite with certainty at the moment.
Speculation is the only "field of operations" we have for now and you should acknowledge this as one of the few "facts" available to us at this time.
We know that we don't know. This makes informed speculation one of the most powerful tools we have.
It says that it is speculation many times right in the 23 parts of devolution. People who forget this may need to be reminded but doing so repeatedly just imbues your posts with a shit energy.
When you put together a meticulously researched theory like devolution replete with 23+ parts and supporting documents and citations, I will be sure to remind you that it is just speculation. It is needlessly dismissive and undercuts the fact that this model fits the data. This is the best working theory that we have.
Edit:- Facts and data have absolutely no effect on normies whatsoever and it is not up to us to wake them up. They will suck the choad of their own ignorance in October.
I never stated any facts. He said, "It just makes no sense". I said do some homework on devolution and then tried to briefly explain it to him.
If someone says I don't understand, how do I lead him in a direction where he could understand? Maybe I should have said good luck finding the truth?
You are contradicting yourself.
"We save the Republic by creating a critical mass of awakened individuals who are aware of facts and truth."
If they can't understand something, the next step would be to lead them in a direction to understand it, like I did. Is that not what you are suggesting? How do they get awakened without showing them?
Proving a negative: proving the non - existence of that for which no evidence of any kind exists.
Here is a 23 part series- https://patelpatriot.substack.com/archive?sort=new
Here is a Newsweek article talking about devolution and what it would look like. Read the first 6 paragraphs. Matches exactly what we see going on today. https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-inside-militarys-top-secret-plans-if-coronavirus-cripples-government-1492878
https://prayingmedic.com/2021/08/04/a-summary-of-patel-patriots-articles-on-devolution/
https://rumble.com/vkkgmi-patel-patriot-devolution-was-strategically-planned-by-trump-and-the-militar.html
https://rumble.com/vwxud5-devolution-power-hour-cliff-high-interview.html?mref=lzerp&mc=3ifeq
https://rumble.com/vssdxu-clif-high-the-quiet-war-1422.html?mref=2oodx&mc=8wf7a
No evidence exists? I disagree.
...and so do I.
EDit :- it;S aLL sPecuLaTiOn.
You never stated any facts?
No, this is what you said. You chided the guy for not doing his "homework" on devolution, then stated the tenants of devolution as fact. Re-read your own post:
"You have not done your homework on devolution. Trump is a president in exile. He still controls the military. He let the deep state steal the election. By doing so he knew they would try to destroy the country. The military stands in wait, ready to step in at any point to stop any massive societal destruction. Everything is being documented and their crimes will be prosecuted when this charade is over."
I swear, I don't know if some of you are shills here to destroy this board or if it's just a matter of not being able to separate fact from theory. It's really tough to determine which is which sometimes.