Was just going to say same. It’s dated July 9, 2022.

From this VOA article:

Does a former president have the right to assert executive privilege?

The question is the subject of some debate among scholars. Citing a landmark 1977 Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of a law ordering Nixon to transfer the White House tapes and other records to a government agency, some legal experts argue that a former president has an implied authority to assert executive privilege.

In the case known as Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, the Supreme Court rejected the government's argument that "only an incumbent president may assert such claims," and it held that Nixon, "as a former president, may also be heard to assert them."

The rationale for conferring the privilege on a former president is the same as the sitting president: If aides believed that a president's executive privilege ends with his presidency, so goes the argument, they'd be loath to dispense frank advice.

But other scholars note the Supreme Court ruling came before Congress enacted the Presidential Records Act of 1978, giving the incumbent president the ultimate authority to exert privilege.

While the Presidential Records Act affirms a former president's executive privilege, in cases of a dispute between a former and incumbent president, it is the current occupant of the White House's authority that matters, according to Schmitt.

"A former president certainly can try to make a claim of executive privilege, but it's still the case that the sitting president has the constitutional authorities and also the constitutional responsibilities to judge whether that claim is appropriate or not," Schmitt said.

This sounds correct!

The resident is not Biden.

Joe Biden had detached earlobes...and a markedly different signature.

Impostor in the "Oval Office" which is also a fake movie set.