Trump endorsed JD Vance just smoked his Dem opponent in OH Senate debate.
(twitter.com)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Damn right. That was fire!
You want to know what a cocksucker in Ohio looks like, watch Tim Ryan.
https://youtube.com/shorts/zBzbS3exFeU
He used the word "Kill". What an extremist.
This guy is two faced as fuck, and is used to pander to the people who "hate Trump's style". Sounds like Kasich 2.0 doesn't it? Look at how he smears and tries to act shocked to emotionally manipulate. Polls say he's neck in neck with JD.
Vance is likely ahead by 6 or 7. Ryan is a colossal douche. Can't stand the fact that he's from my hometown.
Bless his little heart, Tim said he LOVES Nancy Pelosi.
The dems can only push and argue abortion 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Even worse for them, only 10% from a recent poll rank it high in priorities 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's the hill they chose to die on.
Its literally ALL they have. What else can they run on? And it only appeals to lefty feminists, fags and unfuckables. Hell of a platform they got this election cycle🤣
Yeah I think he just pulled a Regan and won with that one... gonna be interesting to have the first ever real Congress of my lifetime...
The other guy could not even look at him! (just staring ahead at the host hoping the bell will ding) He knew he had lost the argument the minute this man started his reply. Host: Ding ding, stop him talking quick! haha
Damn, Ohio man swinging hard with the facts! 🔥🔥🔥
Can we get JD vs DeWine in a Pay-per-view?
The abortion comment, once again, is an ignorant one. I’m sure he’s a good pick, but why advocate for abortion, when a dnc is what should done here? Why wait for a heartbeat, just to kill? Why speak of murder so easily?
I guess it’s ok to give that girl permission to murder? Good man! There are medical procedures we need to be talking about. Teaching these idiots to stop advocating to murder children. I don’t care who it is.
It's between a rock and a hard place. In the case of a 10 year old girl, there is a good chance the girl will not make it. There is a good chance the fetus will not make it. A decision has to be made. At some point, self defense becomes a factor, even against your own baby. In the case of an adult female, it's easy to argue that an innocent baby's life is more important. In the case of a 10 year old girl, that argument gets a whole lot harder to make.
The chances of her life being in danger is probably about 1 in 1000, maybe in 10,000. And IF that happened, there are procedures to be taken. Like terminating the pregnancy. Which does not mean abortion. It mean removing the infant from the mother and letting God and the medical staff give him/her a chance in an incubator. This is coming from a guy who did over 10 yrs of abortions, and explained this very well. The mother’s life is only rarely, very rarely, ever in danger. And as mentioned, abortion is still not the answer. Abortion is another word for murder. Get informed.
I believe that all abortions should function like this. Often there is 0 chance of fetal survival, though.
That's bullshit, haha. Especially when the mother is so young. Child birth is incredibly dangerous.
This is just semantics. To me, abortion is synonymous with "terminating a pregnancy" and it can be done gently in a way that gives the fetus a chance, or it can be done murderously in a way that ensures the fetus dies.
I think your confusing abortion(tearing the baby to pieces/murder) with the term terminating the pregnancy. It means to end the pregnancy. It’s actually safer for the mother and of course the child. There is no such thing as a living abortion. Just replace abortion with murder and it gets easier.
Here’s a video that will tell you everything you need to know, from a guy whose done abortions with near 10 yrs experience in the matter.
https://youtu.be/kHNzoZ4oheU
You need to watch the whole video. But for this go to time 9:20.
Also edit. If a female is able to get pregnant, her body is able to have a baby. This is literally in God’s making. Otherwise she would still be a child. You have to look at this not from a 2022, pc garbage ...but at a view from nature or biology or however you see it. God created male and female bodies to procreate. If she is pregnant, she is able.
Read the last part of my comment. You're arguing semantics.
It seems that we agree on what matters, we just disagree on the words used to describe these actions, which isn't worth arguing over.
No there is no argument. There is no similarity. Abortion is nothing like ending(terminating) a pregnancy. Not even close.
Watch the video. It will explain it perfectly. And as I said, go to the time slot. Because at this point your just trying to say your right, I’m wrong, or were right they are are wrong....it has nothing to do with that. One is murder. One isn’t. Complete opposite.
The latter is the definition of the former. You just decided that the words means something different in order to better facilitate your position.
I already understand it. I just disagree with how you're defining the words. I understand the distinction you are trying to make, but I disagree with changing the definition to suit that distinction. There is murderous abortion and there is gentle abortion. Abortion is just a term for terminating a pregnancy, it isn't inherently murdering the fetus or inherently not murdering the fetus.
In the case of a 10 year old girl, carrying a baby full term, or even close, can kill her. It's tragic all the way around.
Completely wrong.
I’ll post what I e already said.
The chances of her life being in danger is probably about 1 in 1000, maybe in 10,000. And IF that happened, there are procedures to be taken. Like terminating the pregnancy. Which does not mean abortion. It mean removing the infant from the mother and letting God and the medical staff give him/her a chance in an incubator. This is coming from a guy who did over 10 yrs of abortions, and explained this very well. The mother’s life is only rarely, very rarely, ever in danger. And as mentioned, abortion is still not the answer. Abortion is another word for murder. Get informed.
I get what his point was, and it was a political debate. He used the opportunity to shift focus to illegal immigration without looking like a so called extremist on the abortion issue. I am personally against it at all stages, but I get why he framed his answer that way. You don't get why he framed it that way, because you would rather lose an election with strong anti-abortion talk than win one by appealing to a large, large number of centrists. Maybe you should educate yourself on how to win an election, rather than just "being right" on an issue.
So, cater to the sin, to win bigly? Guess I could just deny God to save from the noose one day to, right?
I don’t cater to anything that has to do with murdering a child. The great thing about being faithful in Jesus is, my battles will be won. I may die, but it will only be once, and not for eternity. If you stand for what’s right, that’s also means standing up when it’s hard. People will throw stones. They will mock, insult, you name it. It is written in scripture about this. When you go against the world(Satan), expect opposition. From friend and for. But killing a child is killing a child. Put it in God’s hands. A person has faith in Him, or they don’t. If a 10 yr old can get pregnant, then her body can have a child. Or use many of the other treatments to keep her from getting pregnant to begin with. It’s common sense. Murder isn’t.
Like I said, I am against abortion at all stages. However, not everyone shares that view. Why don't you understand that? I myself was born months early, and the doctors said I had no chance of survival, yet here I am. So again, I am against it. All of it. But I also understand that most of the United States is not as against it as I am. Instead of clubbing them over the head with my views, I find it better to take a softer approach. You do you, though. I am sure you will sway a non believer to your side with a heavy handed approach. Maybe you can tell them all they are going to hell. That works wonders for softening hearts and winning people over.
Everything you said before the “But” was meaningless to everything afterwards. Your a perfect reason to end abortion, period. Yet you would still advocate ripping apart a human life, to save another? There is nothing soft about this. It’s murder. Plain and simple.
Going soft and easy is why we are where we are today. And suggesting to tell people they are going to hell, I’m sure makes you feel better to say, to label Christianity as a whole. It’s wrong of you to say, and wrong of people to so. It’s not our place. A real Christian would never do this.
Call the burn unit! This man has been badly burned!