Alex Jones was at the top for spreading the truth about Sandy Hook. At the same time, it is believed Jones is controlled opposition. Was Jones's claims of Sandy Hook being a false flag and this trial planned years in advance to shut down conspiracy theorists in the future?
Perhaps the deepstate (Obama) fear the truth will be exposed in the future if Republicans gain control both houses. Obama knows they will investigate everything at a future date.
So they bring Jones in and perform a fake trial and hit him with a massive $950 million settlement which on outward appearance confirms the conspiracy theories to be lies.
The only problem is both trials were shams, and it was obvious Jones was getting railroaded.
Jones lost his first case by default.
The judge issued the default judgements against Jones and Infowars after Jones routinely failed to reply to requests to produce documents related to his conspiracy theories about the massacre.
https://www.campussafetymagazine.com/news/alex-jones-loses-2-sandy-hook-cases-by-default/
The second case the judge basically declared Jones guilty before the trial was finished. In both cases Jones never presented any evidence to back his claims that Sandy Hook was a false flag. WHY WOULD HE NOT DEFEND HIMSELF? There were a shit ton of evidence Jones could have presented.
Here is a PDF that explains some of the things Jones could have used to prove Sand Hook was a false flag and there is much more I can remember. Whoever wrote this thinks the Jones trials were fake also and presents his reasoning.
http://mileswmathis.com/jones3.pdf
On the other hand, I wonder if this Jones trial leads to the truth being presented in the appeals process. We needed to bring the Sandy Hook back to present day. The sham trials did that.
Perhaps Jones knew he would have a better chance of defending himself in the appeals court and decided to keep his evidence hidden till that time comes? Attempting to defend himself in this sham trial would just extend the trial and not change the outcome.
So, they hit Jones with a $950 million settlement, we have the sheep's attention, now lets appeal it and present all the evidence that confirms beyond a shadow of doubt that Sandy Hook was a false flag.
There is a current trend where conspiracy theories are becoming hard facts. Showing Sandy Hook was a false flag would be a wonderful way to expose how the evil media lies are being used to transform the country. The whole Sandy Hook event was created by the media from start to finish. Exposing the media for this would destroy them and also uncover the truth that our government was pushing these false flags to repeal the 2nd amendment. Pushing lies to strip us of our rights would be a giant wake up call for the sheeple.
If the country sees Sandy Hook for what it was (false flag), believing the child trafficking, pedophilia and election fraud claims would come much easier.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
It is my opinion that Sandy Hook was a false flag to help push anti-gun legislation. On that however, what good does it do, at this time, to worry about Sandy Hook when the 2022 Midterms are here? I think the case is a big MSM diversion.
Let’s expose 2020, let’s expose upcoming election fraud, let’s push Durham’s trial to more people. This story, along with the Tulsi Gabbard stuff is in my eyes, a LARGE MSM DIVERSION. The number of hand shake accounts recently give me a very comfortable position in which to say that. If we can convince the normies with Dueham and 2022, i think we can then make progress on 2020 and Sandy Hook, why not??
Because it sets precedent for OTHER false flag psyops such as COVID-19.
Sandy Hook was 💯 FF as evidenced by the countless hours of research and documentaries performed by Wolfgang Halbig et al.
Wait for it to play out…
Also, some of the same actors have recurring roles in subsequent FFs.
Sandy Hoax
Had AJ just stated that all he claimed was based on opinion, it could have all been avoided. Why would Americans disallow dissenting opinions? Also, would a conviction based on dissenting opinion mean any dissenting opinion holders then be held financially responsible for " Emotional damage" in the future?
The case you made is convincing to me. I have been wondering about it since I heard the amount, knowing there is something off. It is a good theory, I had only got as far as wondering whether it was to set a precedent on it being a large amount, so that future trials of MSM would have even larger fines.
Appeal cases are always an uphill battle. No longer is the battle on level ground. That is anyway the purported theory of a fair trial. Appeal cases can be rejected. And if they go before the full appellate court, the ratio of overcoming the lower court is only about 1 out of 3 cases (~30%). Moreover, the Appeallate court rules on the merits of the case. Not on the evidence formerly ruled inadmissible. The court would rule on the lower court's decision if it erred or not in denying such evidence.
Could Alex be getting paid to go along with this, and scare other people into not reporting on Deep State?
If they can do that to Alex Jones for reporting on what he has read, then what about all the fake news media?
Does this open the door for us to have a go at them? $$$
Didn't Obama pass some law saying that media are allowed to peddle lies? So that has caused an uptick in garbage on the airwaves. Oh, does that not protect Alex?
Also, first amendment. I would not be surprised to see appeals, etc.