👹⚖️🏛 BREAKING: DC JUDGE SENTENCES STEVE BANNON TO 4 MONTHS PRISON, $6,500 FINE – Judge Will Release Bannon for Now – November 15 Deadline 👹⚖️🏛
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
MORE BANNONS, STAT!
I was quite a happy bunny before I encountered all this Q stuff. I watched the news and I saw what was happening in the world but now, I don't watch the news and I seem to know even more!
The problem I now have is that I have come to realise that what I see can have different meanings and I do not know which one is true. So now we have:
Steve Bannon sentenced to four months in prison because he has upset a Congressional Committee that may not have been set up legitimately. In other words, there may well not actually be a crime.
Or has Bannon has been used as a reminder that contempt of Congress, which has not been invoked for half a century, is still on the statute books and could therefore be applied by future Congressional Committees.
So, what to think? Was Bannon framed or was this just a marker to show that if the make-up on Congress were to change then that law could still be applied? There can be no "We did not know", "We thought it lapsed," "It is outdated" etc excuses.
I agree on the whole news thing. Similar pattern here.
Personally, I think the left wanted to silence Bannon right before the midterms. To accomplish this, they would have had to do so before November 8th. They Failed.
Bannon is going to unleash scorched earth from here on out and it's going to be glorious.
🍿🎬🎥
It's stupid to try that anyway because he's got people lined up to guest host War Room when he's unavailable. I mean, he's got Peter Navarro, Steve Cortes, Posobiec, Terry Schilling, and so on.
It's way too late to stop the red wave legitimately. It's going to have to be a robbery again if they want to have a shot
Remarkably, upvote #17. Hmmm.
Wasn't Eric Holder charged with Contempt of Congress for Fast and Furious? Nothing happened of course. He blew it off.
It's a very good question to ask. In addition, what is to become of White House Staff executive privilege? In the past, Staff positions like Stave Bannon's was always accepted as having executive privilege. Not so anymore.
Simply upvote #17.
Both 1. and 2.
Doesn't have to be an either/or question. You're right on both counts.
It's very common for newsies to frame questions in such a way that the answer seems to be required to be something that reflects badly on the person to whom the question is directed.
Such questions are almost always framed around unspoken lies and erroneous, smuggled hypotheses.
In this case it is unnecessary to choose between the alternatives. Both of them contain a large portion of the whole truth.