Things That Make You Go Hmmmm🤔🤔🤔🤔
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (85)
sorted by:
Point of note: you need no passports in Europe to travel one country to another in majority of countries; e.g. I can travel from Germany to Italy on the autobahn with no passport.
The same is why you need no passport to travel the US across state lines. Needing to go specifically into DC with a passport would raise too many red flags with normies, blowing the ruse.
But it is, indeed, considered a separate entity with its own laws and constitution apart from the rest of the US.
Doesn't each state also have their own laws and constitution apart from the rest of the US?
Please excuse me if I'm wrong, but it seems as if you're arguing that DC is foreign soil because they have their own laws and constitution?
So why would each individual state not also be considered foreign soil, seeing as how states have their own individual constitutions and laws?
The states are united. Washington DC is not a state and is therefore not united.
It doesn't have to be a state to be a US territory ,which is what it is. Thus, it is not foreign soil.
Actually it is it is considered a city state just like the Vatican and just like the city of London
The District is the legal territory of the USA, albeit currently illegally occupied (and likely has been for a long time) by subversive foreign entities.
It's because of the Schengen zone. Countries in the EU agreed to requiring no passports between them.
Yes, and here in the US, it's called The Interstate Commerce Clause
Same thing, different name.
I've never drawn a parallel between those two things, as I've always thought of the commerce clause as limiting freedoms, whereas I've thought of the Schengen Zone as guaranteeing them. Interested to hear how they're the same thing with a different name.
My guess is you mean that the commerce clause prevents states from prohibiting travel between states?
Essentially, yes. In a nutshell, Commerce clause prohibits states from restricting trade across state lines. This includes travel of any kind as well since the majority of trade is done thru trucking. You can include private citizens in that since trade also includes vacation spots, which is still commerce; i.e. spending/traveling as they go...just like the schengen.
The parallels are numerous, hence the comparison.. Sure, there are wording that one has the other doesn't, but to me that's a pedantic platform to stand on. When you strip it all down to what they're for, they're essentially the same purpose.