First, is it even possible?
The answer is yes, absolutely. There is enough (non-weapons grade) spent civilian nuclear reactor fuel to get enough radioactive materials. Much more importantly, there is plenty of “know how” amongst Ukrainian scientists and engineers. Besides, bringing in radioactive materials or specialists is something the AngloZionist Hegemony could do. Did I mention plenty of starry-eyed Ukronazi politicians daydreaming on camera about how to nuke Russia and kill as many Russians as possible?
https://thesaker.is/a-few-thoughts-about-the-dirty-bomb-thesis-and-the-role-of-hatred/
...they are a rather ineffective offensive weapon...
...but given its implementation, it could induce mass panic....
...a larger and more realistic threat are "suitcase nukes" which of last count, more than 80 are unaccounted for...
I doubt "suitcase nukes" are even possible.
That's the goal. Create a problem, then beg the Masters to solve it.
If there is a nuclear war, I plan on going outside and taking deep breaths of the fallout.
When my hair doesn't fall out, I'll laugh in Klingon.
I haven't decided whether i'll loot the deceived or not. Maybe I'll just let them starve while my children repopulate the earth.
When in doubt, do some research, anon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suitcase_nuclear_device
"The lightest nuclear warhead ever acknowledged to have been manufactured by the U.S. is the W54, which was used in both the Davy Crockett 120 mm recoilless rifle-launched warhead and the backpack-carried version called the Mk-54 SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition). The bare warhead package was an 11 by 16 inches (280 by 410 mm) cylinder that weighed 51 pounds (23 kg).
"The W48 nuclear shell is 155 millimetres (6.1 in) in diameter and 846 millimetres (33.3 in) long and weighs 53.5 kilograms (118 lb). It represents the smallest diameter complete, self-contained physics package to be fielded and had a yield of 72 tonnes of TNT (300 GJ). Nuclear weapons designer Ted Taylor has alleged that a 105 millimetres (4.1 in) diameter shell with a mass of 19 kilograms (42 lb) is theoretically possible."
Questioning whether or not "suitcase nukes" exist while assuming nuclear weapons exist as we are taught in school, as we are taught in newspapers, when Nuclear Weapons were placed under Q clearance by Jimmy Carter in 1977, a year Q has highlighted, is missing the forest for the trees.
I'm convinced that "suitcase nukes" are the reason why great things suddenly fade out and go away... like the Supreme Court dealing with election fraud, and the Arizona audit... because somebody will use those suitcase nukes if such things are allowed to go ahead.
So they don't. And we wait.
Maybe this is the specific reason why Israel is last as is mentioned in the Q drops.
Could they be the ones essentially holding us hostage due to the threatened use of suitcase nukes?
Yes, it even has a name - it's the Samson option.
Here is the toned down wiki entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
I think the real thing would be devices already in place in American cities. You know they would do it.
This is said to be a backpack nuke to be used by US special forces.
https://files.catbox.moe/og687u.jpg
...that is a very compelling observation...
...your frontal lobe is producing high value thought processes tonight....
...ty...I think it's all the howling...
...howling frees up one's mind....