OP's video could very well be fake. But do not throw out Critical Thinking.
"Elon Musk has long had a goal of going to Mars. The symbolism is sending people to foreign places with funding of ops around the world.
What does that mean for legitimate space travel? They certainly launch real satellites, but that brings us into another subject. Do you know how many thousands of satellites there are in the sky?
Elon Musk alone with just one of his many projects has placed over 3k of them in orbit. The overcrowding of space with so many satellites is perhaps to be expected as it’s an amazing technology.
This is the case for many of the most important milestones of mankind.
40 years after Columbus landed on America? Thousands had followed
40 years after Transatlantic flight in 1919? Thousands had followed.
40 years after the first Satellite Shot in space 1957? Thousands had followed.
And yet…. 50 years after man walks on the moon? Not a single person or country has followed, nor even attempted to do so.
I’m not saying the Moon landings are fake I’m just bringing up how strange it is. Do you know the distance of a satellite to Earth? Do you know the distance to the moon? That’s an incredible difference.
150 Miles Above Earth = 1961 Mercury Orbit Shuttle Launches
205 Miles Above Earth = 1998-2020 ISS Orbit Launches
250 Miles Above Earth = 1972-2011 The Space-shuttle Orbit Launches
252,088 Miles Beyond Earth = 1969 Apollo Saturn Launches
The official story is that in 1969 Nasa managed to go 100,000 percent further than the space-shuttle ever went.
It’s not just the distance but the fact that they were able to launch a rocket from the moon itself. Able to launch WITHOUT A LAUNCH PAD. I mean… it seems like an important part of any launch. The moon is 1/4 the size of earth but even with less gravity it just seems like the launch pad itself is necessary. It’s not a helicopter… it uses fires to thrust off. A launch pad exists specifically to allow that mode of travel to work. Not 2 feet from the ground.
This is among many other reasons like allowing optimal shape.
I once saw a press conference with one member of the press asking how they managed it all. The answer? “the computer did it”
Here are some more interesting things to consider. From the Wiki page on Low Earth Orbit:
"The term LEO region is also used for the area of space below an altitude of 2,000 km (1,200 mi)."
And...
"All crewed space stations to date have been within LEO. From 1968 to 1972, the Apollo program's lunar missions sent humans beyond LEO. Since the end of the Apollo program, no human spaceflights have been beyond LEO."
Verrrry interesting.
We made it 238,000 miles to the Moon AND back on...our....first...and...only....try.
His last name appears to be a cabal fabrication combo of Kube+Brick = Kubrick as a reference to the black cube that represents Saturn/Satan of the cabal religion. Pretty sure his real name was not Kubrick.
It seems to be popular in Israel and many Jewish names are manufactured. Think of "A Stone" famous scientist, "Red Shield" famous financier, "Sugar Hill" social media guru etc.
Yeah. I wasn't saying it's not a real name. I just notice certain people seem to have odd names as if it is by design for their "mission". Dumb as a stone literal translation of "Einstein" is the perfect example as you noted (to mock those unaware of his theft of other peoples' work and fabrication of BS).
Pretty sure his daughter Vivian who's was in several of his films is a hard conservative. She has come out several times to debunk those claims as well as dishing on some of the stars she worked with on her fathers films. Not sure any of thats relevant, but she would probably know the truth.
I watched a version of this and the interviewer was feeding him lines and names. “Stanley” then asked to stop the interview but the interviewer denied it and said to keep going.
I can see where you mentioned that Q could be noting we have been to the moon but the video of Apollo 11 could have been staged.
That's not Stanley Kubrick.
This is fake.
It's well-poisoning being used to discredit you wherever you post it.
Could be. The lighting is certainly suspect. I looked a photos of Stanley around this time and it does look like him...
Correct. This is a Q research site. The OP is simply proving himself to be an idiot.
u/#q2225
I'm just putting out there. I believe Q might mean that we have been there but not by the means known to the public.
BTW- Calling people idiot makes you kind of a dick!
OP's video could very well be fake. But do not throw out Critical Thinking.
"Elon Musk has long had a goal of going to Mars. The symbolism is sending people to foreign places with funding of ops around the world.
What does that mean for legitimate space travel? They certainly launch real satellites, but that brings us into another subject. Do you know how many thousands of satellites there are in the sky?
Elon Musk alone with just one of his many projects has placed over 3k of them in orbit. The overcrowding of space with so many satellites is perhaps to be expected as it’s an amazing technology.
This is the case for many of the most important milestones of mankind.
And yet…. 50 years after man walks on the moon? Not a single person or country has followed, nor even attempted to do so.
I’m not saying the Moon landings are fake I’m just bringing up how strange it is. Do you know the distance of a satellite to Earth? Do you know the distance to the moon? That’s an incredible difference.
The official story is that in 1969 Nasa managed to go 100,000 percent further than the space-shuttle ever went.
Famous Nazi Wernher von Braun at the steering wheel for these projects.
It’s not just the distance but the fact that they were able to launch a rocket from the moon itself. Able to launch WITHOUT A LAUNCH PAD. I mean… it seems like an important part of any launch. The moon is 1/4 the size of earth but even with less gravity it just seems like the launch pad itself is necessary. It’s not a helicopter… it uses fires to thrust off. A launch pad exists specifically to allow that mode of travel to work. Not 2 feet from the ground.
This is among many other reasons like allowing optimal shape. I once saw a press conference with one member of the press asking how they managed it all. The answer? “the computer did it”
Excellent comment.
Here are some more interesting things to consider. From the Wiki page on Low Earth Orbit:
And...
Verrrry interesting.
We made it 238,000 miles to the Moon AND back on...our....first...and...only....try.
mmhmm
The comment was taken from this article, you'd probably enjoy it.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/decoding-truth-from-historical-lies/
ty
Circumstantial evidence that Kubrick was in the right place (near the suspected California military base with a studio) at the right time (early June 1968) for the rumored "filming" of the Apollo landing: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAvA6RYu/6868-playboy-full-interview-with/c/
"2001: A Space Odyssey" attempted decode: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrUJ6X4t/anon-theatre-2001-a-space-odysse/
His last name appears to be a cabal fabrication combo of Kube+Brick = Kubrick as a reference to the black cube that represents Saturn/Satan of the cabal religion. Pretty sure his real name was not Kubrick.
His great grandparents immigrated to the US in the late 1800’s from Ukraine to New York. They were Kubrick’s.
Interesting. So it is a legitimate name through at least 3 generations? Ukraine you say?...head pops
Lot's of people do seem to have had the surname of Kubrick.
It seems to be popular in Israel and many Jewish names are manufactured. Think of "A Stone" famous scientist, "Red Shield" famous financier, "Sugar Hill" social media guru etc.
Yeah. I wasn't saying it's not a real name. I just notice certain people seem to have odd names as if it is by design for their "mission". Dumb as a stone literal translation of "Einstein" is the perfect example as you noted (to mock those unaware of his theft of other peoples' work and fabrication of BS).
My husband and I served at R Lee Ermy’s funeral. I listened to the Kubrick crowd. Something was not right.
His confession seems fake.
Pretty sure his daughter Vivian who's was in several of his films is a hard conservative. She has come out several times to debunk those claims as well as dishing on some of the stars she worked with on her fathers films. Not sure any of thats relevant, but she would probably know the truth.
Wow.
I watched a version of this and the interviewer was feeding him lines and names. “Stanley” then asked to stop the interview but the interviewer denied it and said to keep going.
I can see where you mentioned that Q could be noting we have been to the moon but the video of Apollo 11 could have been staged.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MTDpsDWz7NzB/