The Kid By The Side of The Road
The kid by the side of the road is an interesting title of a book from a man so many follow, and so many question in the fight to save America. This is not a review of his book, but to encourage people to research who he is and what he is watching for by that side of the road as the world goes by. Each is to make their own decision.
The kid by the side off the road, we know his name as Juan O’Savin. Pronounced 1-oh-7, or One-Oh-Seven, not 107, also known as 17. Juan (One) is the original 17 of Trump’s 16 + 1 Intel team that he began with while President. 16 Intel Officers/People, Plus or (+) Trump, and 1 more, Juan, making a total of 17. Trump’s inner team is much smaller now, after he left office and removed people that were not 100% into his mission. I don’t have any clue the size of Trump’s Team now as all that is hush-hush. But Juan is still there. And this name description has been given by just about every Truther that has interviewed him, especially clarified by David Nino Rodriquez. So who is he and what does he exactly do?
Many of Anons across media have said he is a “grifter” just making money off the movement, or that he is a past guy named Wayne Willot, As discussed on the site LINEFAME https://linefame.com/juan-o-savin/ . You can click and read for yourself. Is he Wayne Willot? He could be or he isn’t. even LINEFAME states the Wayne Willot name is a pseudonym. Because both Wayne and Juan have no background, no family background, no address that we know is real, and Wayne has no pictures that I could find. Does Juan have pictures? Yes he does. At the Las Vegas Patriot Double Down https://rumble.com/vo9b9z-i-see-you-juan-o-savin.html Juan himself appeared. And looked strikingly familiar to people. Some said he looked like the Vincent Fuscha guy mentioned in Fall of the Cabal Part 10, but heavier, shorter, and cowboy’d out. Others felt he was a JFK Jr. ringer, but the same, shorter, heavier, and cowboy’d out. Of course for either men, does anyone really know either of their height? Because as we know from what can be done with cameras/photos, lighting, makeup, bodysuits, shoes, and computers, you can make anyone appear to be someone else. And I was in Vegas as were many of us Patriots from California that weekend, and I personally got to at least see Juan in person as he left, and said “thank you” to him directly. He said “thank you” back as he left Double Down, went outside and jumped into an awaiting car and drove off. Its well documented on Rumble. I didn’t have tickets to be at the meet, but many other Patriots did, and took pics, with him, and got books signed from what I understand. Anyway, we’ve got a face to one name now, and it’s a matter of time and where he appears next, and talks more about who he is himself. So what makes his messages important maybe?
Out of all of the “Truther” Rumble, Bitchute, and Youtube Telegram, personalities out there Juan appears to be the most connected to “possible” information on events before they do or don’t happen. Why do I say it this way? Because everyone who has listened to Juan states he can be confusing and talks double talk. Well, yes he does. He is talking in military strategy code of String and Game theory. If this, than this. If that, then that. But what if this equals this or that? Juan states or suggests things that may be, and hints silently on things he doesn’t directly say but “could” mean. If you have a copy of Kid By The Side of The Road, the book is written in the same fashion as he talks, but written out and easier to back track and research on. And Juan tells people over and over to research what he suggests/says. He is never down to the point, or rock solid on what he states except when talking about the Bible, and what America must face to correct it’s impending future.
Juan is an obvious Biblical scholar, as he appears to know the ins/outs of the Bible better than most preachers I’ve heard, off the top of his head, and he knows a ton on the apocrypha, Book of Enoch, and other removed Biblical canon or books. He uses many pieces of the Bible to piece together his points of why the Cabal is doing what they are doing. And he seems, seems to be on point with much of this from my limited point of view.
On events going on in America, he always suggests events and is never date certain. Now on 1 video he did claim when Trump would come back in office. That didn’t happen and Juan has admitted in several David Nino videos he was wrong. But he also stated in being wrong, this is war. And war is fluid. Things change and the Chess Board is always adjusting and changing to the players moves. So since that one time, Juan hasn’t pinned down any dates, but encouraged certain events may or may not take place depending on what the Cabal does in their moves. Juan also mentions Q a lot, but never specific Drops, more a summary of things that have happened, and possible things to come in relation to Q. Juan also tends to speak on a Truther program a day before, or hours before the next X22Report comes out. I’ll let you all time check yourself. But it appears consistent because Dave at X22 is consistent haha. https://rumble.com/v1ql5vb-juan-o-savin-and-ninos-corner-trump-is-last-chess.html
But let me stop here and discuss the one point Juan has stated over and over the last 6 months. Juan has been very clear about “America’s Near Death Experience”. Since his live broadcast with David Nino on Nino’s Corner and Rumble, Feb. 23, 2022, https://rumble.com/vvoize-juan-o-savin-q-and-a-with-david-nino-rodriguez..html Juan has stressed and stated America will at some point either before, or right after midterms, go through “A Near Death Experience”. He explained this as the Covid Vaxx damage data, the 2020 election fraud data, crimes against humanity/children, and the economic collapse all crashing together at one singular time. And it causing the whole country, the Awakened and Sheeple to almost think America has truly ended and Civil War is upon us. Though both Juan and Q have stated there would not be a kinetic Civil War. Though Juan himself states there will be riots and “skirmishes”, and X22Report has backed this idea up on multiple programs. But again Juan stresses things can move and adjust depending on what move each side takes and how destructive, stupid, or even smart, those moves “may” be.
So each of you reading this will have to make your own decision on what he is about and who’s side he is on. I believe he is for us Anons and Patriots. Someone Trump put in place to relay info/Intel to us Anons, and to both retired and current military people in his Game/String theory, coded type talk. I look at him as our point-man French Underground, WWII Code Talker, Hanoi Hannah type Broadcaster. But also a Patriot and American, just a Kid By The Side of The Road, watching the world go by. But planning and plotting quietly, Silent Running https://rumble.com/v1on8xi-donald-trump-silent-running.html to help us win our war against The Cabal.
At some point soon I will also put out the pieces of the Fall of the Cabal Part 10 Puzzle Pieces that lead to him, Q, and my prior released and being revised theory on Christ. So please stay tuned here in The Great Awakening.win And I am in no way grifting for him, but I do recommend picking up his 2nd Edition book to get a better feel for where he is coming from, and so you can try to unravel the Comm Puzzles throughout the book, math items, and page cubes, other items in pictures, ending with Melania's dress on the back. Its all information that will help that one Patriot somewhere decipher something we all might need to know, in this fight for America, and the World. WWG1WGA and WWG1WGAWW
This was a follow-up to my posts on the thread link below, for additional info and thread connection. https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6qL3hor/juan-o-savin--ninos-corner--trum/
Thank you. I do already.
But you must be quite a researcher. I am amazed, for instance, you knew about Richard Nixon's connection to Operation Paperclip.
He said a lot of interesting things, but how is one supposed to validate? Does he point to info or documents or data that can be used to verify in any way? Does he refer to sauce?
I find the absence of such things unsettling. The people that I trust most in the Great Awakening, commentators, or anywhere habitually check and balance themselves but also cite sauce.
107 seems to make a LOT of claims - and some very interesting ones - BUT does he ever provide sauce, reference, trackable data?
Perhaps I just don't pick it up because of his particular style, but my impression is, LOTS of claims, not a lot of info provided for follow up or verification. Because of that, one is pushed into the realm of either believe, or not. Ultimately, I don't find that increases my sense that he is credible. Interesting? Sure. But providing foundation for individual follow through?
Maybe I missed it?
Actually, most of the time he is very careful in stating it as "I want your liosteners to think about this. Is XYZ possible. How might that happen?" not as "I am claiming this will happen"
I'm talking primarily about claims of things he states has happened.
Nixon's connection to paperclip, for example.
I'm inclined to think he may very well be correct. A lot of what he says has the ring of reason. However, the lack of reference to sources is notable for me. I guess I've been trained by you know who to apply due diligence, verify, check sources, and work the information.
Predictions are one thing. Reference to "facts" about the past are another. I want to be able to verify things I hear claimed. Even if I think the person sharing the ideas/information might be or is likely correct.
You sound like you’re upset he’s not behaving like an oracle. Perhaps your idea of what an oracle does needs adjustment. It sounds like the man gets people thinking. Whether he knows the answers to his own questions or not seems irrelevant to me.
Projection.
I'm not upset, and neither I have ever considered whether 107 is "an oracle" or not.
" I ignore him" may help explain why you say "I have never heard him tell me something I did not already know".
Did not hear him say =/= he did not day.
Fwiw, this response to Juan == /pol/ posters response to Q.
Am I simping for Juan or Q or Trump? Nope. Everyones life and death is their choice. However, I've learned alot from "hearing" all "three". I prefer evocatives.
I listened to him. And stopped for reason previously stated. And he's incognito. Trust factor is zero.