Basic physics (ie free fall velocity) proves the support provided by the underlying structure of all three towers was almost 0. Only one way to get that effect, and it’s not a bit of jet fuel.
its not explosives either. there's a reason the seismic activity did not match a million tons of debris hitting the ground. those towers turned into powder on the way down.
IIRC the framework of a tower like those would likely survive a normal explosive anyway. Even targeted explosives. It would need some serious focus (probably) to bring it down, as in a willful act.
Steel could melt as people have pointed out many times, not by the jet fuel but by the friction and speed of impact, and all it would need is a brief moment of such high temperatures.
But that doesn't explain the fall looking like target demolitions. If there were, say, 8 beams making the bulk of the support framework (arbitrary) and two of them melted, it would fall lopsided and much more sloppily.
I truly hope one day we get the unaltered truth of that moment. It was that moment, of moments, where we descended down this tyrannical road and our government reached for power beyond what the Constitution allots, and they haven't stopped reaching.
You are 100% correct. There was a 911 video posted on YouTube where you could watch the top of a tower, a metal rod poking straight up, literally turn to dust. It hadn't exploded - in fact the building was just starting to collapse. But that pole turned to dust right before my eyes. That convinced me there was something more at play than just explosives.
Globohomos carried out 9/11. Demolished via explosives.
Yeah that whole thing has so much surrounding it. Hard to know exactly what’s true since we weren’t there.
Anyone who sits and thinks about it for two mins knows the official govt story is bullshit.
Kinda like how people know the official ukraine story is BS.
“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”
Basic physics (ie free fall velocity) proves the support provided by the underlying structure of all three towers was almost 0. Only one way to get that effect, and it’s not a bit of jet fuel.
its not explosives either. there's a reason the seismic activity did not match a million tons of debris hitting the ground. those towers turned into powder on the way down.
IIRC the framework of a tower like those would likely survive a normal explosive anyway. Even targeted explosives. It would need some serious focus (probably) to bring it down, as in a willful act.
Steel could melt as people have pointed out many times, not by the jet fuel but by the friction and speed of impact, and all it would need is a brief moment of such high temperatures.
But that doesn't explain the fall looking like target demolitions. If there were, say, 8 beams making the bulk of the support framework (arbitrary) and two of them melted, it would fall lopsided and much more sloppily.
I truly hope one day we get the unaltered truth of that moment. It was that moment, of moments, where we descended down this tyrannical road and our government reached for power beyond what the Constitution allots, and they haven't stopped reaching.
You are 100% correct. There was a 911 video posted on YouTube where you could watch the top of a tower, a metal rod poking straight up, literally turn to dust. It hadn't exploded - in fact the building was just starting to collapse. But that pole turned to dust right before my eyes. That convinced me there was something more at play than just explosives.
Yup. Gotta love that the people saying follow the science being the ones who deny this fact.
And a ring of fire. As johnny carson foretold