The problem is by using a catch all ("the Jews") which not only falls into a pitfall, but empowers and enhances the impact when you hit the spikes at the bottom.
There are better ways to target different sects or specific groups of people, but it's incredibly easy to generalize ("the Jews") and ultimately destroy any point you are trying to make in the eyes of the pedestrian.
But you have to remember that you aren't usually debating or arguing a point for the person you're talking to to change their tune, you are arguing for the onlookers.
So when you are making an overgeneralization that comes across as incredibly dishonest (unless anyone who says "the Jews" actually does believe that Average Joe Jew down the road is part of a global effort to control and/or destroy the world or its population) you are turning the onlookers against you.
But if you talk about the Khazarians, you'll incite a few people to start their journeys down that rabbit hole.
What do you suggest we do? The Jews are in control of the world, that is undeniable, what better ways are there to target different sects? I am not going to hit any spikes, the Jews are. To discriminate about the ones who eat children would give the perps an escape route, "it wasn't us it was the others!"
There's the problem; it's not "The Jews are in control of the world", it's "Some Jews, with others, are in control of the world". Through your generality, you could say, "Indians (from the country of India) are in control of the hotel industry", or "The Irish are all alcoholics!".
But the difference is, when you even HINT that a Jewish person did something wrong, you're deplatformed instantly and in some countries you're even jailed.
That is what you do to HIDE things, not to stop hate speech.
Not entirely. You have outed yourself as against their agenda, the same way as as saying you support Trump, the second amendment, are against vaccinations, doubt the legitimacy of the origins of the coof as stated, etc.
All of these things get you canceled to some capacity, because they out you as an enemy to their agenda.
It's not just when you say "Jew", but that makes you an extremely easy target.
Again, you are using "they", which gives the impression that the entire population of Jewish people in the world are controlling the world. Yes, there are prominent Jewish people (or at least they claim to be) who are in control of major aspects of the world, but it would be difficult to believe it is only Jewish people.
"We" might, if Catholics controlled the media, a huge swath of our banking system and much of our government. And if any individual's life and livelihood could be ruined for criticizing Catholics as a group.
There is only one group that may not be criticized.
The problem is by using a catch all ("the Jews") which not only falls into a pitfall, but empowers and enhances the impact when you hit the spikes at the bottom.
There are better ways to target different sects or specific groups of people, but it's incredibly easy to generalize ("the Jews") and ultimately destroy any point you are trying to make in the eyes of the pedestrian.
Going down the khazarian rabbit hole is deep, dark and long, and will still end up with you being called an anti-semite.
Going down any of these rabbit holes gets you called something,
Q supporters are crazy conspiracy theorists that are somehow dangerous violent people despite not being Antifa/BLM who openly have been.
But you have to remember that you aren't usually debating or arguing a point for the person you're talking to to change their tune, you are arguing for the onlookers.
So when you are making an overgeneralization that comes across as incredibly dishonest (unless anyone who says "the Jews" actually does believe that Average Joe Jew down the road is part of a global effort to control and/or destroy the world or its population) you are turning the onlookers against you.
But if you talk about the Khazarians, you'll incite a few people to start their journeys down that rabbit hole.
What do you suggest we do? The Jews are in control of the world, that is undeniable, what better ways are there to target different sects? I am not going to hit any spikes, the Jews are. To discriminate about the ones who eat children would give the perps an escape route, "it wasn't us it was the others!"
There's the problem; it's not "The Jews are in control of the world", it's "Some Jews, with others, are in control of the world". Through your generality, you could say, "Indians (from the country of India) are in control of the hotel industry", or "The Irish are all alcoholics!".
But the difference is, when you even HINT that a Jewish person did something wrong, you're deplatformed instantly and in some countries you're even jailed.
That is what you do to HIDE things, not to stop hate speech.
Not entirely. You have outed yourself as against their agenda, the same way as as saying you support Trump, the second amendment, are against vaccinations, doubt the legitimacy of the origins of the coof as stated, etc.
All of these things get you canceled to some capacity, because they out you as an enemy to their agenda.
It's not just when you say "Jew", but that makes you an extremely easy target.
If they don't control the world then who does?
Again, you are using "they", which gives the impression that the entire population of Jewish people in the world are controlling the world. Yes, there are prominent Jewish people (or at least they claim to be) who are in control of major aspects of the world, but it would be difficult to believe it is only Jewish people.
Take this for example. We know the pope is corrupt and lots of pedophile priests. Do we say "Catholics are pedos" ?
"We" might, if Catholics controlled the media, a huge swath of our banking system and much of our government. And if any individual's life and livelihood could be ruined for criticizing Catholics as a group.
There is only one group that may not be criticized.
In general, yes. At least the Catholic clergy.
A lot of people do and very often as well.
Also when you do call out individuals the rest still dogpile on you anyway.
Ve didn't know. Ve vere good jews.