After almost two years of not posting, we have a few "new" Q posts. There were a few in June and then the recent one.
These posts are without deltas that I'm aware of, meaning Trump didn't coordinate with these Q posts by posting a minute after Q's post.
These posts seem to come and go like they make no difference at all. They're an afterthought, after we've all been in the frontlines researching about Ukraine entirely on our own for months if not years, asking these basic questions like "What groups are financing Ukraine?" comes off as almost an insult.
The pacing makes little to no sense. 3 posts in June, but nothing for a year and a half prior? 3 posts in June, but nothing else through November? You would think, if there's only going to be 4 posts in almost 2 years, that they would at least have substance to them.
On the heels of the June posts there was alot of drama questioning whether the new Q posts were legitimate. From what I recall, people accused Jim Watkins of changing the salt for generating tripcodes, locking Q out. There were some posts (without tripcodes) of sequential deltas where posts were coordinated with Trump posting, and then this individual who established the deltas claimed the board was compromised and Q was locked out.
Common sense would dictate that if Q hadn't post in 2 years, the plan called for stopping all communication (perhaps something to do with laws of war). Another reason to not post at all in years is we already have everything and Q's communication with us came to an end. Why then are there 4 new posts? They don't fit.
Q is fully able to confirm themselves beyond a shadow of doubt. Their tripcode was compromised in the past, they reaffirmed themselves with sequential photos over North Korea, sequential to prior ones posted. They can confirm themselves with deltas -- it's literally the simplest thing to do in the world. Right now, Trump is confirming past Q posts like there's no tomorrow (like the recent one saying "plus" three times with a delta of a Q post with three +++ in it).
Confirmation is easy to come by and handed out like candy by Trump.
But not Q. No deltas. No confirmations. No explanation why gone so long other than "had to be this way", but then skipping many months between June and November -- why did that pause have to "be that way"? What special thing happened between June and November allowed Q to post in June but then skip 5 months to post again?
I don't believe the current Q posts from June onward are actually Q, and I won't until there's at least a delta or another proof offered.
The content seems to be a real hint. There isn't much substance to the posts, just a few statements and questions that anyone paying attention to this debacle could bring forward.
For that reason alone, it seems unlikely they're real.
As far as I am concerned. Until verified they are fake. This should not be a guessing game. The real Q would not want it any other way.
Trump made some strong Q proofs yesterday.
I believe he did as well in June when Q posted.
"Your vote matters " sounds exactly like something Q would say at this time. Not DS
I agree with you.
Watching for and reading Q posts for that couple of years was a wonderful time. I loved every minute of it. But, it appears it is over. So, if you missed it, you missed it. You can read all the posts, but living it in the moment was splendid. A real gift.
It's happened before it can absolutely happen again. People need to be less trusting, especially after such a long quiet period.
Honestly, the plan seems to be unfolding in front of us. I'm not concerned about whether these latest posts are legit or not.
I also assume that if they were fake, the White Hats would make sure we knew that.
They might not do outside comms, but I think they have ways of getting a message to us when we don't get it. I.E. that some frens that post are more than they seem.
My sentiment exactly. Not concerned.
Qpost: Yes? That's nice. No? Won't do anything.
I disagree……
I can’t get into a long post, but these Q posts are legit.
The last few were accompanied by many odd happenings on Truth Social, pertaining to the Q account which was registered before opening, and Trump going full Q on Truth.
Trump gave us a 0 Delta of a Q post +++ Nov 6 yesterday.
Think he would still be doing 0 delta proofs if the Q that just posted moments before were fake?
Think they wouldn’t strip these fake posts?
Not a chance.
The garden was very interesting word choice, almost felt like he was speaking to me ;) lol
Then yesterday I was thinking “…. I wish Q could come back and give us one post… just a little cheerleading session of any sorts, give us that energy let us know he has our back.”
And boom, he gave us MORE than that. He put on display and validation Hunter and Ukraine connection, for the MILLIONS of new eyes who came during the comms quiet, here was one of their “first” new Q posts to feast their eyes on. Days going into the midterm.
Anything I wasn’t sure about in the main stream IE is what everyone on the forum saying about Ukraine and Biden connection and the war being a total front TRUE? Well, according to Q and his short but potent post it is true.
I see all the points you’re making, but you’re disregarding the most important thing.
When they finally went full Q and asked the question, when we really needed him as Biden took over he went quiet.
Now we await his every word, and he throws us those bones.
The silence during all that was so important, because when he finally touched on COVID it was BOMBSHELL AFTER BOMBSHELL ARCHIVED IN Q POSTS FOREVER.
The silence was so important because we needed to crawl and lift ourselves up, and NOW WE HAVE THE TOOLS. NOW WE HAVE THE VOTE AND IT COUNTS.
Silence Is Golden. But not forever.
That was Trump, not the supposed new Q.
Did he? Moments, as in a 1 minute delta?
Why did no one post about it?
I hear you, all I’m saying is within what, hours of the new Q trump goes live and claims +++ which goes back to another Nov 6 post +++ on same date.
Seems like Trump is sending us to deltas of Q posts on the same day Q came back for the second time in over a year?
Yeah sorry, IMO these Q posts were authored by 1 of the less than 10 Q team members.
Agreed. These new posts just don’t fit and have not been verified in any way.
Here's a delta and a proof https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDh6exRw/anon-finds-one-helluva-q-proof/c/
I think this is a proof as well.
Most likely they are fake. I remember there was a ZDQ (zero delta Q) posting in hivemind basically confirming qresearch was compromised and that ZDQ had moved to hivemind. ZDQ did a few zero deltas with Trump TS posts to prove his identity.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqslXQdq/due-to-8kun-admin-wankery-q-has-/c/
Spot on. The board was compromised and they are trying to co-opt Q and steer anons astray. The posts are laughable in structure and content and can be safely ignored.
lol. But how does this post do that?
Anyway, at this point, I really don't see the 2022 posts as much to bother with. One way or the other.
If it is a 'booster' for newbie anons, ok. If not, don't think it makes any difference.
Just my $0.02
I saw news of a 'new Q post' this morning and I yawned. Either way, the operation has moved far, far forward.
PS. The criticism of 'structure' and 'content' seems simplistic. Over 4800 Q drops. Diversity of structure and content is huge, imo.
They haven't started the astray phase of Operation Seize Q yet. They have to establish the 'new' Q's credibility first.
Yawn.
Not a problem. To imagine that any serious or significant Seize Q campaign is either underway or even viable is to imply that patriots are def. NOT in control, that Q is impotent, and that DJT team is on shakey ground.
I don't buy it.
Not gonna happen. They might attempt to create chaos, but even if they do, it will be limited in nature best. The Great Awakening is outside their reach now, and cannot be stopped or derailed.
Q post in when? No posts for 1.5 years. A few posts in Jun, (so far) one post in Nov, just a day before the midterms. At this pace, it will take them years to gain any traction.
Let's just say what it is: your objections that the board is compromised and that the recent Q drops are illegitimate are speculation at best, and at this point unprovable, just as much as the assertions that the board is 100% secure and that the drops are legitimate are speculation and, at this point, unprovable.
So we choose what we choose to believe or accept, and go from there.
If you are speculating, well, I'm all ears. But imo, anyone who speaks with absolute or purported certainty but provides no tangible proof but only argument should be treated as a zealot and cannot be taken seriously.
Yawn? What a cunt you are. I would respond to the rest of your post which is basically "no one REALLY knows so shut up" but your opening killed off any possibility of real conversation so I won't bother.
Ok. Apologies. Yawn might seem condescending. I didn't intend it that way, but anyway.
I didn't intend to block of productive conversation or discussion either. However, for me, I notice that all your comments are stated as if fact. No real indication of speculation, as far as I can see. Did I say shut up? No, you're reading into something that's not there.
I met what I perceived as your apparent firm and unshakeable conviction that your viewpoint is correct and factual with what I think are reasonable and reasoned points.
if you are offended, again, i apologize, and I would be quite open and interested to hear any speculation, reasoning and ideas about the topic .... unless they are stated as incontrovertible facts. That. well, I'd say the same: that approach closes off any real discussion.
Expressions like "I think...", "it seems to me...", "as far as I can see....", "I believe..." all admit to fallibility and an openness to discussion.
"They haven't.... They have to...." imply you actually think that is a fact.
Anyway, that's how I see it. If you want to discuss, we can. Text is often a VERY limited medium. Sometimes one has to work at establishing a common communication wavelength. Are you willing?
You're insult doesn't hurt, because I know it's certainly not true.
But I'll also speculate the true is NOT the same for you. So, why don;t we attempt to actually understand each other instead of reacting and calling each other names?
Fair enough. I don't usually lose my cool like that and I am always open for discussion.
I was raised to avoid "weasel words" in speaking and writing. Words like 'I think', 'It appears to me', just my opinion' and 'I believe' are weasel words and as I was taught are an unnecessary waste of time for your reader or listener. Make your assertion clearly and unequivocally. Explain your assertion in like manner. Your reader (or listener) will decide the merit of your offering.
As we were discussing an unknowable point (whether or not the latest Q posts are in fact from the same Q) I did not see the need to point out that my assertion was based in opinion and not fact.
My view is simply this: the latest Q posts are not from the same Q team. I have expected that the Cabal would attempt to post as Q and hijack the movement at some point if their attacks on 'QAnon' failed. I expect this simply because it is a logical step to take. Given that the board was shown to have been compromised and the new posts were shown to have been manipulated coupled with the stark change in tone, polish and content I find it very difficult to imagine they are legitimate.
I am of like mind to you in that I see no reason at all to change course from this view however, if they are real, good. If they are false, fine. But at this point it doesn't really matter. If 'Q' starts pushing DeSantis 2024, then I'll know for sure.
Just my opinion, for what its worth, your mileage may vary.
Thank you Cardinalix!
I appreciate the comeback, and in particular the explanation of your approach to discussion. "Weasel words"!!!! Kek! I guess it's certainly true that some folks can use these to weasel!
So glad to have some increased clarity on this. As I mentioned in the last response, sometimes (more often than not) it takes time and effort to build a common communication wavelength, <weasel> in my opinion </weasel>.
Sorry. kek. Couldn't resist!
I haven't done any particularly deep digging on the "compromised" premise, but on my part, I encountered nothing at the recent "Q" foray in June that convinced me that the "compromised" theories were true or of consequence. But information overload has taken its toll; perhaps I was simply not paying enough attention. That said, I have to question the "it has been shown" re: board, re: manipulated, and as I said before, the "stark change in tone, polish and content" angle I find less than convincing.
Kek. It would be a real flip for Q to start pushing DeSantis.... Don't see that happening unless DJT himself came out and did that! But time will tell.
I think your opinion is well worth considering. I don't reject the view out of hand.
I guess I would say that my position is strongly neutral, slightly pro. By which I mean, without further clear evidence, I am resistant to a position that rejects the drops as being illegitimate, but also cautious and uncommitted to a position that accepts them as definitely legitimate.
To wit: I watch and wait. Requires more data, reflection on context, and observation of things as yet unshown.
Thanks again for the reply!
Your assessment is spot-on.
Some anons have not been able to develop discernment, so they react to everything with fearful skepticism. They bend over backwards looking for a reason to doubt. That's why we see these posts.
I think it's perfectly reasonable to entertain doubts or speculate on whether the drops are legit or not, but the exercise should also be recognized as a test of one's ability to apply Q technique: due diligence, expanded thinking, checking emotional interference at the door, evidence and empirical data foundations, etc.
I've stated this numerous times; for me the greatest Q proofs are the fruits of the Q operation:. Millions and millions of people awake to things they never even imagined 2, 3 or 5 years ago; the spirit of camaraderie and solidarity among patriots and q-aware freedom fighters worldwide, etc.
I find that folks who pin their belief purely on the technical Q proofs (deltas, etc) are missing the more a significant evidences that Q is legit. As such, they are easy targets for those who spread or inspire doubt, angst, ire, etc. These responses are EMOTIONALLY charged responses, and not in a positive direction, and that should be a red flag for those involved.
The problem is NOT doubting, or being unconvinced. (I'm unconvinced, but to me it isn't material anyway - whether the drops are legit or not doesn't affect my focus at this point.) The problem is NOT being aware of how one is responding to the new situation (drops), because... by definition... the less aware you are of your own state of reasoning, programming, reaction etc, the more open you are to manipulation.
If we are in a spiritual war (we are), then one doesn't have to watch out for so-called black hats and black hat agents. There are many, many more agents in the spiritual realms seeking to foster doubt, distrust, distraction, and to impede patriots in any way possible.
This is why the Q techniques are so important. Not just defending against black hat agents on the physical realm, but also against spiritual attacks that come in the form of inserted thoughts and feelings from unpalatable (spiritual) sources.
June posts were fake I confirmed that myself. It did not post with the rolling color trip code.
This one did.
I’ll keep my suspicions on the whole thing regardless. But I think this one is real.
This is the correct answer.
Agreed
Until they are confirmed or there is some other compelling reason to believe thay are genuine I'm not a real believer in them either.
I'm saying I'm agnostic on them and maybe tend toward disbelief.
No confirmations and the posts themselves have a wet cardboard feel to them.