I am now waiting for various people to jump into this thread (like they have in others) and attempt to explain how the missile attack IS a FF, but it is based on an "accident".
Accident my ass.
It was a deliberate FF intended to counteract the "declas" announcement they expected President Trump was going to make on the 15th. Just like the two "disinformation" symposiums scheduled for the next day by Bush and Obama.
This brings up an interesting question: why are some people working so hard to try to convince everyone the missile attack was an "accident"? The map above clearly shows how ridiculous that is... so why are they doing it?
Because 99% of the people who are told by the media it was an "accident" are going to believe it without looking for something like the above image to prove it clearly wasn't.
Wait. Stop. It's an S-300 missile, which is an anti-aircraft missile. We know this from identifying the parts from the photos released. S-300 missiles are solid fuel propelled which means they fire and the engine burns until depleted. The missile has a speed of Mach 6 and maximum range of the standard missile is 150 km (93 miles). Google it yourself.
Russia has air superiority in eastern Ukraine. The only S-300 systems operating are in the rear, the western parts of Ukraine. Russia attacked infrastructure the other day, sending 100-110 cruise missiles towards targets, which would have been engaged by S-300 missiles. There is most definitely a plausible scenario where it hits a Poland border town. It was fired from the rear which is only place you'll find S-300s operating anymore, defending a massive (100 cruise missiles) strike to the rear.
NATO and the rest of the criminals are seizing on this to use as a false flag, tho, most definitely.
Lmfao I was waiting for this to pop up I knew it would.
Even if theyāre shooting down a missile that was coming at them from Russia, the mapping doesnāt line up. Russia controls eastern Ukraine. I donāt think thereās much of anything even happening west of Kyiv so itās entirely bullshit.
Besides havenāt we spent billions of dollars giving them top notch nato weaponry? Whatās the bullshit about faulty outdated missiles being usedš¤¦āāļø
The only plausible scenario that the S-300 missile was actually launched by the Ukraine to try to intercept a Russian missile (which I'm not even sure it can do) is that the Russian missile was fired from the region of Kaliningrad, which is a small piece of land by northeastern-Poland that is controlled by Russia, but still a few hundred klicks from the Ukrainian border.
But that would require Russia to fire a cruise missile that travels in Polish airspace before reaching the western parts of the Ukraine. That alone would probably be enough to justify as an "attack" against Poland, and trigger World War 3.
The odds of this being a False Flag are far greater than this being any kind of misfire, or botched attempt at missile countermeasures.
(((they))) had the attack on a NATO country to bring the West into a world war all cued upā¦
Had POTUS ādeclasāed on them, the narrative against Russia was on!
Wake up peopleā¦ AND LETS GO!!!
Itās on like Donkey Kong and we have 45 on our team!!!
Yes, exactly this.
I am now waiting for various people to jump into this thread (like they have in others) and attempt to explain how the missile attack IS a FF, but it is based on an "accident".
Accident my ass.
It was a deliberate FF intended to counteract the "declas" announcement they expected President Trump was going to make on the 15th. Just like the two "disinformation" symposiums scheduled for the next day by Bush and Obama.
This brings up an interesting question: why are some people working so hard to try to convince everyone the missile attack was an "accident"? The map above clearly shows how ridiculous that is... so why are they doing it?
Because 99% of the people who are told by the media it was an "accident" are going to believe it without looking for something like the above image to prove it clearly wasn't.
Official stateme: Woopsie!
Compass broke?
Must've used the Flat Earth compass...
<slaps forehead>
READ BELOW
Wait. Stop. It's an S-300 missile, which is an anti-aircraft missile. We know this from identifying the parts from the photos released. S-300 missiles are solid fuel propelled which means they fire and the engine burns until depleted. The missile has a speed of Mach 6 and maximum range of the standard missile is 150 km (93 miles). Google it yourself.
Russia has air superiority in eastern Ukraine. The only S-300 systems operating are in the rear, the western parts of Ukraine. Russia attacked infrastructure the other day, sending 100-110 cruise missiles towards targets, which would have been engaged by S-300 missiles. There is most definitely a plausible scenario where it hits a Poland border town. It was fired from the rear which is only place you'll find S-300s operating anymore, defending a massive (100 cruise missiles) strike to the rear.
NATO and the rest of the criminals are seizing on this to use as a false flag, tho, most definitely.
Hey, everybody makes mistakes.
Do they have kambucha enema, blue hair teachers teaching geography over there too?
Lmfao I was waiting for this to pop up I knew it would. Even if theyāre shooting down a missile that was coming at them from Russia, the mapping doesnāt line up. Russia controls eastern Ukraine. I donāt think thereās much of anything even happening west of Kyiv so itās entirely bullshit.
Besides havenāt we spent billions of dollars giving them top notch nato weaponry? Whatās the bullshit about faulty outdated missiles being usedš¤¦āāļø
I accidentally took a shit out of my mouth instead of my ass, Did you believe that? It happens all the time
i still dont understand why we havent attacked Ukraine...they attacked Poland and article 5 of Nato says an attack on one is an attack on all
How many normies would actually look up a map of Europe?
And something like 2% of the Ukraine war funds are coming FROM Poland. lol
"Thanks for the funds..here..have a free missile."
These people are stupid.
False Flag FUCKUP! They can't even get that right!
The only plausible scenario that the S-300 missile was actually launched by the Ukraine to try to intercept a Russian missile (which I'm not even sure it can do) is that the Russian missile was fired from the region of Kaliningrad, which is a small piece of land by northeastern-Poland that is controlled by Russia, but still a few hundred klicks from the Ukrainian border.
But that would require Russia to fire a cruise missile that travels in Polish airspace before reaching the western parts of the Ukraine. That alone would probably be enough to justify as an "attack" against Poland, and trigger World War 3.
The odds of this being a False Flag are far greater than this being any kind of misfire, or botched attempt at missile countermeasures.
I mean, northeast, northwest... The guy heard something about "north" and turned the key. It happens.
So they were firing at what?