My wife is 80% normie. She says that the Q proofs are impossible and too specific and there must be a different explanation. She's hanging her hat on a theory that the Q posts are edited retroactively, including the Internet archives.
I have been looking for a paperback or something that can be proven to be written before 2022.
Thoughts?
Tell her to quit being such a conspiracy theorist.
Good point - that is actually quite the conspiracy! It means that somehow all the sites referencing Q posts are either somehow hacked or in on it :)
IKR?
Show her the Podesta painting and Vanderbilt pool from Q1901. Timeline on that doesn’t matter, all that matters is what kind of sick mthfkr would ever have that kind of “art”. As a woman, that’s the drop that hit me in the feels, and maybe it will be similar for her too.
u/#q1901
Yea, this is the part she is on board with.
My thought is that very little proof will move the needle much on an 80% normie. Sauce? I'm married to an 80% normie too.
Same situation here. She used to be a 100 percent normie. I moved her needle 20 percent these past couple years. How? She knew a lot of people that got jabbed and either died or are scarred for life. She saw how hard trump was attacked even after he left office and it made no sense to her. Its a slow process. When she picks up on things, reinforce why. Time will take the normie out of everyone eventually. Q posts? Forget it. Way over her head atm.
2000 Mules is just about the only thing that ever made it through my wife's 90% certainty. Q is like totally outa bounds!
Good idea.
Its obviously before 2022. I was reading Q posts back when they started in 2017. Everyday waiting for new posts and happy when they came out.
If it were possible, I could show her the files on my computer. They are all dated when I downloaded them. I started downloading Q posts and related info in February of 2018, just 4 months after Q started. I have folders by year and month of all those files. Q wrote for us to save everything, and I have done that.
All you can do is point the way. Up to them to start steppin'.
0 deltas are undeniable imo. Either Trump was involved all along, or Q is a DS op with access to twitter servers and lagged Trump's posts while black hat Q quickly wrote posts referencing Trump's not-yet-posted twitter post.
If internet archives etc were edited, that's proof it's still something major. One can't be a normie and think that.
OMG I feel sorry for you. She will not change her mind no matter what you 'show' her. So end the game and make a decision.
A 'lot' of us did archive in real time, and sources online can be proven for provenance too.
We cannot prove a negative thing tho, and this point isn't her true objection.
Good luck, patience, I've been working on my Lovely Wife for a couple decades, she still wants to argue at times. Show her other physical examples of media corruptions and news stories describing matters, show her reality from other perspectives. Don't frame it as 'Q', frame it as 'huh look at that'.
Lead her to read and think for herself..... HAHAHA, I just assumed her gender!
https://files.catbox.moe/7z5bu6.png
I will go have a look, but off the top of my head this is a good intro: https://www.onq.martingeddes.com/
OK, I know it won't actually convince her, but if there are any zero deltas in this book that happened after the date of publication, it will destroy that argument! thanks fren.
I would tell her the same thing I tell everyone who lacks the curiosity:
“I don’t know anyone who has read all of the Q posts (and analysis) and has come out of the rabbit hole without a deeper understanding. There is no way that I can force feed you years-worth of information. I respect your unwillingness to explore it, and I am happy to join you if you opt to take the journey at some future point. In the meantime, let’s not discuss the topics on which we have such differing viewpoints.”
Anything else is just a setup for frustration and resentment.
There are a couple of books, Praying Medic and a few others. There are also Q proof videos from a few years ago.
Yea, I forgot about Praying Medic. I'll check it!
That's solid advice.
A lot of normies say they don't believe it. I say, great! You don't have to "believe" it. You shouldn't "believe" it. I don't "believe" everything out there either. But, this isn't a matter of belief, or faith. It involves critical thinking and discernment. If you're unwilling to seek out the information for yourself then perhaps you aren't entitillted to the truth. I'd start with a topic that piques her interest the most, find out what she already knows about it and show her the evidence that validates what she's already knows. Then help her connect the dots from there.
This type of denial is completely without logic or resin. Therefore you cannot use either one counter it. Falls into category of "you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink."
Sorry to hear it, but you'll have to find another way, probably without Q for her.
But you can give him Ivermectin!
Perhaps you can ask her to prove that they've been retroactively edited.
Maybe don't go the route of "future proves past". Don't try to convince her of divination. Don't try to convince her of prophecy.
Instead ask her does she think spies are real? Do governments use spies? Yes, they do. All over the world. Imagine q as the best spy ever, who recruited us in a digital war.
It is not cool to be a normie unless you are a college student trying to impress your peers so you can fit in and go to protests with them. Period!