BREAKING: Physicists have built a wormhole and successfully sent information from one end to the other.
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Horseshit
u/#howdareyou
Translation: Some guys made a quark disappear at one location, and 0.6 picometers away a similar looking quark appeared, so: Wormhole!
...and yet the 'quark' is a temporary apparition, flux or state and not a 'thing'...
Real or not, Wormhole comes from sci fi writings. A physical representation of a larger idea.
We are currently at an 'Event Horizon' of which the so-called Wormhole would be a physical demonstration (attraction causing an ever-tightening spiral until compressed to a theoretical zero point and then spiraling back out the other direction.
Conserve/Progress
Think of the point at the bottom of a pendulum swing where it is neither going up or down. but in a sort of limbo....
We find ourselves at an Event Horizon in historic time. 'Coming out' of the zero point, down becomes up, poles flip, things reverse. (No, not in time...another subject)
So the optic of what is going on, and how this happens has to be co-opted and controlled like all the rest.
The Trick: Taking Deus Ex Machina
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_ex_machina
wha?
We are not just observers, but participants.
More true every day, no?
Today's pic of the 'dueling guns' on the bedside table.......one is from Deus Ex...
Conservative/Progressive
Future Proves Past
I'll make a post about the decode later today.
The null point is at the event horizon. Once something goes into a "black hole," it is gone forever. Not that I fully endorse the concept.
As for particles being here or there, these commenters forget about quantum tunneling. Electrons do it all the time. No wormhole, because---from a quantum mechanical standpoint---the location of the electron is diffused through a probability distribution...that has a non-zero existence beyond a barrier.
Diffused location is an interesting concept as is probability distribution and non-zero existence. I understand the supposed concepts, it's just that they don't actually describe anything.
I once offered an idea to a group of physicists, who then misunderstood and misrepresented as 'String/Drum/Magic' theory without citing me, thankfully.
Theory often works on a level that matter doesn't.
Quantum mechanics is already passe, but don't tell popular science.
Quantum tunneling is a "thing," and mainly shows up in the physics of transistors, so I don't understand your impression that it is non-physical.
I don't know what you mean by theory working and matter not working. If the phenomenon doesn't happen (matter does not work), the theory does not work.
What, exactly, has superseded quantum physics? Or are you talking about it's fancy re-invention through chromodynamics?
u/#cmon
Can we try sending Biden through it first? Followed of course, with Harris.
I was into those Physics and Astrophysics books written by scientists for people with no math skills. While reading Michio Kaku Parallel Worlds, a question occurred to me; What if everything he says is wrong? Since that moment, I have not trusted a single Hubble image, now the webb telescope, multiverse, M-theory, Inflation, Red shift, the list of theories goes on and on. Whatever idea they can come up to convince government to fund their science projects.
Everything the government touches, turns to shit. One day, the truth about Cern will be uncovered for all to see
Michio Kaku is a theoretical physicist, and is likely to be highly proficient in math skills, because that is the basis of the theory. Do you have any reason to think that what he says is "wrong"? (Failure to understand is not a reason to suspect error.) I'm not saying he is altogether right. I probably have disagreements. But it is unlikely that he is altogether wrong. This is where further study is required.
Maybe you just need to understand more, and be less credulous.
As for CERN, it is only a waste of time and money, lavished on highly-advanced con artists for their futile pursuit of fantasy particles. How is any government bureaucrat going to suddenly have a burst of reality and declare publicly, "Guys, this is a huge mistake. We have been throwing billions of dollars in the trash simply because we were afraid to say 'we didn't understand what you were saying' to these impressive scientists. So sorry. Our bad."
It's always particles, particles with these physicists.
“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”― Nikola Tesla
“If you knew the magnificence of the three, six and nine, you would have a key to the universe.” – Nikola Tesla
Have they done this? Or is it another -- 'Look, there's the virus! When it is really not and something totally different'.
And energy, frequency, and vibration can manifest as "particles." A photon is regarded as a particle. I conclude from your reference to "these physicists" that you are not a physicist.
You are speaking in terms of particle physics. This is why I said "particles, particles...". You shouldn't "conclude" anything.. maybe you were instead 'inferring' or 'guessing'. If you are disagreeing with Tesla, then you have a very steep grade to overcome. When does a steep grade become a wall?
"Particle" physics is inseparable from quantum physics, which I doubt Tesla was familiar with. I conclude that if you were a physicist you would say so, instead of playing games. How could I be disagreeing with Tesla? What do you know about Tesla's work that you could put on the table? I suspect you are only a Tesla enthusiast incapable of understanding either his work or current science, but quite willing to take up a banner for a cause you don't understand.
You're 'inferring' I am "playing games". It is said that exaggerated pride complicates relationships. Stop imagining things that aren't there.
I remember those college days in Physics class all too well. It was a fun time. My teacher worked at Palamar Observatory for JPL many years ago. I'd get to class early in the morning to talk to the teacher and have coffee with him. We'd talk about many things and he'd always tried to recruit me for a career in physics. One particular morning I approached the building and he was standing before the door staring at the ground. I paused to watch as he stood motionless. I finally said to him, "What are you looking at?" He replied, "Bees, Don't step on the bees". I then looked down and saw several very sluggish moving honey bees on the sidewalk. The instructor then said, "They are all waking up. Soon the sun will be warm enough for them to fly away." We carefully stepped around them as he unlocked the classroom door. In his office he said to me, "Speaking of bees..." I looked at him and interrupted him in mid-sentence saying, "No! I didn't get a 'B' on the exam, did I?" His face grew a big smile and said, "No, but you were the only one in class that derived Schrodinger's equation. I haven't had a student successful in doing this for many years. I'm just curious to know more of your thought process on it." It wasn't hard for me to answer that question. I told him, "It came to me in a dream the night before. I figured it out in a dream." I still remember the exact time when I woke up and said, "That's it!" My professor looked at me and said, "Your playing games with me". I said, "No sir, you're 'inferring' this, but it's the absolute truth". I then told him the rest of the dream I had regarding electron clouds and the sudden disappearance and reappearance of electrons. I explained to him the theory I had in my dream. His response was with utter amazement because it was a new unpublished theory at JPL.
You and I have gone in circles before. I remember them all. We don't agree on much regarding science. I've always been respectful in my responses to you though. It would be pointless of me to answer any of your questions regarding Tesla. You don't know who I am, nor do I you. There's no room big enough for insincerity and pride.
Good for you. But you are not a physicist?
Parsing word choice as a point in argument is a rhetorical game, so far as I am concerned, and I have experienced a lot of argument in my life.
I've read of Tesla. I admire him. I think he was on to things that we have not followed. I think his turbine concept was very inventive and possibly a good fit for rocket turbopumps (simple, light). But there is no indication he knew of quantum theory. And it still follows that if you talk about "vibrations," there must be something that vibrates. The search for more particles? It's like the search for more elements. You will get temporary mash-ups based on the energy of the collision, things of momentary stability. You will be lucky to measure their evanescent lives. The fact that we can talk about "particle physicists" is a clue that this whole direction of research has ossified, as though there were no other physics.
So, if you think there is something from Tesla, bring it out for consideration. The inability of people to put their position on the table is a bad trait on this site.
I have read Nigel Calder, Brian Greene, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein and others, and can tell you it's an interesting field. What fascinates me about astrophysics and quantum physics is that you're dealing with a lot of assumptions about what exists and what doesn't, and sometimes the mathematics can be torturous when you try to explain it. Warning: it can become addictive, going down all those rabbit holes and going through hypothetical wormholes. It isn't without humor, though. A couple of examples for your reading pleasure:
Werner Heisenberg is stopped for speeding on the highway. The trooper asks him if he knows how fast he was going. Heisenberg says no, but at least he knows where he is.
Higgs boson goes to a local Catholic Church on Sunday morning, but when he gets to the door the father won't let him in, and they get into an argument. Exasperated, Higgs finally tells the father: "Look, Padre, you have to let me in. Without me, you have no mass."
Mr. Neutron was in a pissy mood on Friday because Mrs. Neutron wouldn't let him go fission on the weekend.
Oh, these crazy physics jokes...
Lost in the danger zone, god damnit!