The purpose of the statement, “One came to save souls, and that is Christ” was twofold: 1) no human being is coming to save humanity or the world (from Satan) but one came to save lost sinners; 2) the One who came to save souls—Christ—will return in judgment. Until that time, the judgment upon the nations will continue. The world events prove that is true. With one comment, I can refer to the Scripture, proclaim what is coming, draw your attention to current world events, and completely null and void the bizarre and unrealistic theories being perpetuated by people on the right (across the entire spectrum from non-Q-Trump-2024 to Devolution).
We are a nation who abandoned God, no matter how many Christians rebel and persist we are a nation who acknowledges, loves, or pledges allegiance to God. Consequently, God abandoned our nation, and the evidence is our deepening iniquity from the top levels of government and authority, down. Additionally, the increased depravity both is and calls down more judgment upon us (Romans 1:24-31).
You’re not going to “win” this argument. There is no “win.” There is only truth, because even your perception of winning is not based in truth. Deny it or accept it, but it will not change the truth nor what is coming. You truly cannot stop what is coming, no matter how noble or moral or righteous it may be or is to want to conquer Satan and that which he does in this world (and what is yet to come). Keep pressing in on the notion that arresting or indicting Trump will be the “last straw” catalyst for the military to save the nation and the world, but it’s not realistic and it’s not biblical. You do not need to be a Bible scholar to understand this.
I’m willing to be flexible on the idea that a conservative or Republican could take office (but that assumes 2016,2020,2018,2020 and 2022 are resolved and fixed) but like I said before, even when Trump took office in 2016, the swamp was not defeated… it only grew stronger, lashed out harder, and fought harder to prepare more for the long term.
I tell you, raging against this and labeling it is dooming and black pilling will not make your theories come true. It will not change what is happening. If it gives you a false sense of security, hope, or victory, okay… but it will not heal your wounds or give you any real hope. Hope is in Christ alone, not Trump, not Scavino, not Patel, not Flynn, not Lake, not Lindell or the U.S. military, or anyone you “need” to label as White Hats to keep the dream alive.
no human being is coming to save humanity or the world (from Satan)
Complete 100% strawman argument. You're arguing against statements no one ever made.
the One who came to save souls—Christ—will return in judgment
Complete 100% deflection.
The original hill you were trying to defend was that you were speaking on behalf of all anons, broadly declaring that no one got any outcome they hoped for.
Now you're retreated to incoherent scripture reading as if that's supposed to somehow back up your original premise.
"Thou shalt not use the Lord's name in vain". Using the Lord's name as patchwork to your shoddy arguments certainly is in vain.
You’re not going to “win” this argument. There is no “win.”
And, thankfully, your flawed perception of reality is limited to the space between your ears.
raging against this and labeling it is dooming and black pilling will not make your theories come true
You have no idea what my theories are, because I never mentioned them.
All I said was you're a bonafide blackpiller.
There's no waiting for that to become true, that's past-tense.
A) My arguments against Trump, Q, and the military stand. They are incapable of defeating the swamp because the swamp is run by Satan. God has ordained Satan to hold the world captive to sin and religious deception. The Dems are paving the path. If you disagree, then explain why not. If you happen to think the time of Tribulation does not involve Satan’s religious deception and the judgment of God, and that I’m incorrect, you are welcome to argue your beliefs. But these are my beliefs and they are in the book of Revelation. Christianity and conservatism does not win this. The time of Tribulation is coming and nobody will stop it. Defeating the cabal, the swamp, Satan himself, would mean the time of Tribulation would not occur and God would have no reason to judge the world. But it’s coming.
B) The judgment of God falling on the U.S. and the nations is not an example of using His name in vain. It is an observation that aligns with Scripture. All are being judged for rejecting God. This is how we approach the Tribulation.
C) Enlighten me on your beliefs and theories then. Most people who post here mention their personal beliefs and opinions. That’s the point of having a forum. All arguments I make are based on no human entity being able to defeat the swamp/cabal/Satan. If that happened in Scripture, there would be a basis for believing in it, regardless if you agree with other anons here and their theories (or at least the two most popular beliefs—Trump 2024 or Devolution—put forth here).
D) I am a black piller. I am everything you choose to label me. That will not stop the swamp from accomplishing its goals. Like I said before, the SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, CIA, the entire justice system from the top down to the state and local level are under the control and power of Satan. Rigged elections will not be resolved and fixed. Arrests are not coming. Not even in January when the House officially moves on their promised investigations into Hunter and Joe and company. Do you agree? Disagree? Or are you going to rely on “you don’t know what I believe because I never stated them”?
E) Let’s not forget the nothing 🍔 Elon Musk reveal of Biden-corruption-suppression on Twitter via Matt Taibbi that will result in nothing. The more corruption patriots uncover, the more energized they feel that “something is going to happen… because look! It got exposed, and now the world is awakened, and enough people are angry so something has to happen..” all the while Trump’s tax fraud failed to be swept under the rug by the Twitter reveal, and it still made all the headlines.
But I’m sure none of these subjects or topics have anything to do with your beliefs because people here are not allowed to know what you think, or you have no idea what to think about them, right? (which would be the most honest thing on here).
A) My arguments against Trump, Q, and the military stand. They are incapable of defeating the swamp because the swamp is run by Satan. God has ordained Satan to hold the world captive to sin and religious deception.
"Satan only has victories and God only has defeats because Satan rules the world."
Not.
And you moved the goalpost so far it's on the other side of the planet now.
Let me remind you of your original premise you completely failed to substantiate in any way, which is: "Nothing anyone posts or exposes means anything meaningful" and imagining everyone here is equally as delusional in that they all throw a party at every victory and wallow in despair at every defeat.
Not all patriots thought WW3 would have zero casualties as you suggest.
B) The judgment of God falling on the U.S. and the nations is not an example of using His name in vain.
Invoking God to bolster a failed argument certainly is.
All are being judged for rejecting God.
The tares grow with the wheat until judgement day. In case you are confused, today is not judgement day.
C) Enlighten me on your beliefs and theories then.
Bad people are running amok. Good people are stopping them to the best of their ability.
The bad people had the advantage for centuries, if not millennia. And they still have much advantage. But with the advent of modern technology, the good guys devised a plan to fight back.
I am a black piller. I am everything you choose to label me.
Since you like arguing everything in terms of what God thinks, when God taught us to pray He said "Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven."
And if you were there, you'd rebuke Jesus and tell Him that God's will can't be done on earth, because Satan rules here.
No doomers or shills: If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. - You've confessed yourself that you don't belong here. You should leave and find some messaging forum that allows your black pilling activities.
Elon Musk reveal of Biden-corruption-suppression on Twitter via Matt Taibbi that will result in nothing.
The purpose is that everyone is moved one inch closer to the precipice, because that's when change becomes possible.
all the while Trump’s tax fraud failed to be swept under the rug by the Twitter reveal
Here's the irony.
Here you are, broadly proclaiming that everything is meaningless, meanwhile you're on top of it all and paying close attention and declaring everything as a failure.
On the other hand, I'm hardly paying attention to any of it, because I know the purpose of everything is to push everyone closer to the precipice.
Tax laws are written to be so convoluted that anyone could be found guilty of anything. Yet, instead of saying most taxes should be abolished like most patriots would, you're siding with the cabal and stating, not only are taxes good, but passing judgement on Trump that he actually engaged in fraud.
because people here are not allowed to know what you think
People here know what I think because I know how to communicate without violating forum rules and getting myself banned repeatedly.
The concept of making arguments and engaging in discourse involves reading, understanding, and restating others’ beliefs and then meaningfully responding to that to make a point. That nature of discourse involves these things. I am still not sure if you intentionally misrepresent what I say (by using quotes around comments not said by me or in my reply), or if you’re paraphrasing like what I did with the person 1/person 2 scenario. But what you did is not the same. I didn’t make the statements you “quoted.”
Example: You used quotations in this statement: "Satan only has victories and God only has defeats because Satan rules the world." I did not say this.
What I am saying, however, is God granted Satan authority over the ruling powers of the world to conduct evil that brings us into the Tribulation and the Great Tribulation. That’s the main idea behind Satan being the “god of this world”: sauce: https://www.gotquestions.org/Satan-god-world.html
You might have a foundational theological differing viewpoint of evil, who conducts it, and how it operates in the world (especially the governing institutions and authorities). For clarity help me understand: how does Christ’s victory at the cross and at the end of the age (what I’m referring to in my entire argument) somehow mean “God only has defeats”? You should want to justify this and answer for this. Otherwise, why are you engaging in discourse with me? What’s the purpose of intentionally misquoting and misrepresenting me? Are you even aware you’re doing it or do you actually believe I made the comment inside your “quotes”?
Again, proclaiming the judgment of God falling on the nations is not taking the name of the Lord in vain. Nations are capable of experiencing blessing, grace, mercy, and judgment at the same time. The difference, however, is that as we move into the Tribulation and Great Tribulation, judgment gets worse and worse as evil gets more powerful. God allowing that to happen is part of, essential to, God’s acts of judgment upon us.
If you honestly believe that the U.S. and the nations of the world are currently not experiencing judgment from God for rejecting Him (considering the moral state of each nation and the evil they conduct from the top down), then how do you account for the increasing evil and depravity of every nation as we near the so-called precipice, including the Tribulation and GT?
The reason the question of point #2 above is relevant is this: your response to my post/comment is that tares grow among the wheat. Once again, that is not related to my comment. The reason: tares are unbelievers and wheat are believers. Tares attend church with the wheat. The day of final judgment reveals them, yes…. But… this is not related to my belief/statements/comments on Satan purposing evil in the world, God judging the nations and allowing Satan to operate evil. I will explain:
The judgments leading into the Tribulation, during the Tribulation are not the same as the day of final judgment when all stand before God (believers and unbelievers, and get judged according to their unbelief and evil deeds, and those according to righteousness as believers). These are different concepts of judgment and different periods in time.
Your statement: “Bad people are running amok. Good people are stopping them to the best of their ability.
The bad people had the advantage for centuries, if not millennia. And they still have much advantage. But with the advent of modern technology, the good guys devised a plan to fight back.”
This is evidence of what I’m saying regarding Satan having authority to rule evil and run the world accordingly. Modern technology does not equate to moral progression or increase or even conquering evil. Let me explain:
Because of: 1) internet; 2) social media forums/outlets; 3) news media/outlets; 4) weapon technology; 5) increase of non-biblical ideologies; 6) increase of morally corrupt behavior; 6) crypto currency and more… (including anonymity in emails/communications)… the nations of the world, the leaders of the nations of the world, the citizens of the nations of the world, the media, the military powers, and all the sexual predators and organizations/cartels for drugs and trafficking of human are all interconnected now and can (and do) conduct their evil business on a faster and global scale, especially with the anonymity of currency and other things. Pornography is the best example I can think of immediately.
Now, I’ll grant you that there are good people at all levels who fight against that evil and corruption with the same usage of technology, but the corruption far, far, far outweighs any and all efforts to eliminate it. And it all comes back to the concept of bringing us into the Tribulation. And the precipice we/you speak of as relating to the 2nd great awakening, Q, the white hats, the side of good, the military, etc. does not end with conquering satan, restoring America (and to what exactly? A solely Christian nation void of evil and sin and idolatry? It never was…)… it only moves us closer to the Tribulation, not restoration.
The Mods can distinguish between my speech and behavior, conduct and that of banned accounts for flagrant evil and division. The act of me awakening to the reality of the incoming Tribulation and no longer adhering to Devolution (any of the multitude of variations and theories therein or thereabout) is not a justifiable reason that I should desire to not come here, or even be banned. I’m not harming and I’m not conducting malice. As stated above, these topics are worth discussion and for the sake of discourse and the truth, I’m choosing to engage you on the subjects.
The conundrum or paradox of hoping in saving the country and freeing the world of the cabal is (sorry to say it) a false hope that drives it’s adherents more insane and in more despair as they long for the freedom that only occurs at the very end of the age (even after the final day of judgment mentioned above). Our hope is in Christ, not man… at every level.
I am still not convinced that the Twitter suppression disclosure will result in what you think it will (possibly a global awakening and the final act that restores America and defeating the cabal?) or something similar?) or at least as I perceive it since you did say “the good guys devised a plan to fight back.” Okay, but the logical conclusion? The purpose in fighting back? The objective? End goal? Would that get you banned, as you alluded to? Or did you mean you want to curse and be violent and repulsive but you choose not because you would be banned? I’ll explain more at the end of my comment…
Anyway, the Hunter Biden laptop contents are global (thanks to modern technology) and have been for a few years now. The contents of the corruption far outweighs the Twitter suppression and I’ll explain why I believe that:
A) virtually everyone around the globe, world, sphere (sorry, to any flat-earthers) know about the laptop from hell. Even the MSM (or much of it) finally relented to the authenticity of the content (but with much prolonged backpedaling, I’ll grant that too).
B) The nature of the content and corruption is worse than the suppression of the story of the content (regardless of an election), even on a global media outlet such as Twitter. It already made the rounds since then.
What is my point? My point is this: an awakening already happened with the release of the laptop from hell… and what happened? Nothing. What more would a lesser awakening like the Twitter disclosure cause to the effect of finally taking down the cabal? The SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, justice systems from the top down, and governments are ruled by evil (Satan). The only thing an awakening would cause is WWIII with abuse of military and nuclear power (January 6 was a microcosm of what is to come).
I’m not saying “everything is meaningless” (again you put quotations around a comment I did not make… please indicate you are paraphrasing and stop using quotation marks as if I said those things.. once again… that’s different from my person1/person2 example in my last post/reply if that’s what you are trying to do).
God told us what is to come in His Word. We know how to live in this life (in the world not of the world). Anyone in position of power with nuclear access, anyone in the military, whether they are Christian or not, whether they know what is to come or not, is not acting unrighteously by fighting against evil. Am not saying that (in case you might believe that I’m saying that). It is noble. But… ultimate victory is not coming until Christ does away with it after the final judgment at the end of the age. That doesn’t make us lost and without hope (but nor does it mean we take down the cabal).. that brings us closer to Christ and causes us to rely on Him more since we are without the ability to conquer Satan and “take down the cabal.”
Persecution and suffering refine us and strengthen our faith. The apostles who were martyred knew that intimately.
Anyway… The precipice you speak of is not comparable to what is coming in the Tribulation, should you find yourself in the earth at that time or live long enough to see its arrival.
Please try and capture the main point of each point I make if you’re going to engage with me. Ask for clarity if you’re unsure so that you’ll know how to respond to it. I’ve asked you for clarity in this comment so I can better know what you mean, i.e, your beliefs as relating to you potentially getting banned. The reason I pose the question and ask for clarity is this: the nature of the belief(s) in question directly relates to Q, Trump, devolution, military etc. So, do you mean your beliefs on those subjects would get you banned? How would they break the rules? This is what I mean. Does that make sense?
F) You need to start to making & justifying your arguments against my arguments and laying out what you believe if you intend to participate in this discussion in a meaningful way. Stop acting like a wounded animal, get over your emotions, and make an actual argument.
For example:
Person 1: God is judging the world. Satan is the dominating evil power behind the SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, global elections and, consequently, immoral ideologies are destroying society and humanity. Nobody is going to destroy Satan but Christ in the end. Sauce: https://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html
Person 2: No, you’re a black piller. You’re taking God’s name in vain. You’re just avoided everything and you don’t know my beliefs because I don’t share them.
Person 1: Okay, explain your beliefs and arguments that justify you disagreeing with me.
Do you see why trying to have a meaningful discussion with you is losing my interest. I would not stay this long or keep replying if the topics didn’t matter but they do. If you don’t care enough to state your beliefs, then why attack and disagree with anyone to begin with????
G) Using biblical phrases like “out of context,” and “taking the lord’s name in vain” is not a meaningful response to anything I said. If I had cursed by using the Lord’s name, intentionally rejected Him, blasphemed, or attributed something evil to Him, then, yea, that would be taking His name in vain. You’re obviously biblically illiterate outside of likely having faith in Christ and His life, death, and resurrection, but you chose to act this way and falsely accuse me of something that has not occurred (taking God’s name in vain).
H) If you think my conclusion that God is judging all the nations of the world and that Satan will not be conquered by human beings (but only by Christ at the cross, spiritually, and then at the end of the age in the last judgment in the temporal/physical sense of eliminating evil and the works of Satan in the world) is faulty, then make your counter argument and be concise. Otherwise, I’m losing interest in what you have to say… Not because you think I’m a black-piller, but because you’re not capable of keeping up with the arguments (and you don’t understand the things you say regarding the Word of God).
I see now that your theological and doctrinal understandings differ from mine. For example, tares among the wheat as relating to the final judgment vs. the Tribulation. Even the subject of taking the Lord’s name in vain as relating to our entire discussion.
You and me are obviously on polar opposites regarding the current state of humanity (politically, religiously, and the nature of Satan’s work behind that). We differ as well on our expectations of the good guys vs. the bad guys, the white hats vs. the black hats, Trump/Q/Q+ and the patriots vs. the swamp/the cabal (intimately the devil and what is granted to him until the final judgment). Wherever your beliefs fall within the spectrum of the patriots/Trump/Q etc., you have an expectation of victory that does not comport with the Bible. I’ve done what I can to lay out how and why that is the case as I see it in Scripture and in reality.
Where am I going with this? Well, you seem to have the impulse of taking the lowest road and accusing me of taking the Lord’s name in vain. I am not convinced you truly believe that. You wrongfully accuse me, once again, of “invoking God to win political arguments.” But when I tell you that the victory you expect is not coming, and then I qualify that with God’s revelation of the future time to come (when Satan’s power in the world system of evil is defeated once and for all), that’s not using the Lord’s name in vain. I’m not politically motivated… but the nature of the discussion heavily involves politics and religion as they relate to the coming Tribulation and what God has ordained to happen to the world (including trumpets and bowl judgments).
Either you accuse me in ignorance, or you do it in defiance. But I’m convinced, either way, you do it because I’m obligated to be labeled as a black-piller. That’s not much different than two Christian’s debating sovereign election and free will and then one accusing the other of not being saved.
The underlying problem as I see it is this: You’re being petty because I “defected,” and you think I should be banned because of it. How are you much different than a leftist or a raging Democrat when your belief system is challenged? Like Dems on Twitter, are you wanting me to be banned? When did I wound you? When was I malicious?
I want serious and meaningful discourse. If you do not, then just say so.
The purpose of the statement, “One came to save souls, and that is Christ” was twofold: 1) no human being is coming to save humanity or the world (from Satan) but one came to save lost sinners; 2) the One who came to save souls—Christ—will return in judgment. Until that time, the judgment upon the nations will continue. The world events prove that is true. With one comment, I can refer to the Scripture, proclaim what is coming, draw your attention to current world events, and completely null and void the bizarre and unrealistic theories being perpetuated by people on the right (across the entire spectrum from non-Q-Trump-2024 to Devolution).
We are a nation who abandoned God, no matter how many Christians rebel and persist we are a nation who acknowledges, loves, or pledges allegiance to God. Consequently, God abandoned our nation, and the evidence is our deepening iniquity from the top levels of government and authority, down. Additionally, the increased depravity both is and calls down more judgment upon us (Romans 1:24-31).
You’re not going to “win” this argument. There is no “win.” There is only truth, because even your perception of winning is not based in truth. Deny it or accept it, but it will not change the truth nor what is coming. You truly cannot stop what is coming, no matter how noble or moral or righteous it may be or is to want to conquer Satan and that which he does in this world (and what is yet to come). Keep pressing in on the notion that arresting or indicting Trump will be the “last straw” catalyst for the military to save the nation and the world, but it’s not realistic and it’s not biblical. You do not need to be a Bible scholar to understand this.
I’m willing to be flexible on the idea that a conservative or Republican could take office (but that assumes 2016,2020,2018,2020 and 2022 are resolved and fixed) but like I said before, even when Trump took office in 2016, the swamp was not defeated… it only grew stronger, lashed out harder, and fought harder to prepare more for the long term.
I tell you, raging against this and labeling it is dooming and black pilling will not make your theories come true. It will not change what is happening. If it gives you a false sense of security, hope, or victory, okay… but it will not heal your wounds or give you any real hope. Hope is in Christ alone, not Trump, not Scavino, not Patel, not Flynn, not Lake, not Lindell or the U.S. military, or anyone you “need” to label as White Hats to keep the dream alive.
Complete 100% strawman argument. You're arguing against statements no one ever made.
Complete 100% deflection.
The original hill you were trying to defend was that you were speaking on behalf of all anons, broadly declaring that no one got any outcome they hoped for.
Now you're retreated to incoherent scripture reading as if that's supposed to somehow back up your original premise.
"Thou shalt not use the Lord's name in vain". Using the Lord's name as patchwork to your shoddy arguments certainly is in vain.
And, thankfully, your flawed perception of reality is limited to the space between your ears.
You have no idea what my theories are, because I never mentioned them.
All I said was you're a bonafide blackpiller.
There's no waiting for that to become true, that's past-tense.
Feel free to respond to each paragraph:
A) My arguments against Trump, Q, and the military stand. They are incapable of defeating the swamp because the swamp is run by Satan. God has ordained Satan to hold the world captive to sin and religious deception. The Dems are paving the path. If you disagree, then explain why not. If you happen to think the time of Tribulation does not involve Satan’s religious deception and the judgment of God, and that I’m incorrect, you are welcome to argue your beliefs. But these are my beliefs and they are in the book of Revelation. Christianity and conservatism does not win this. The time of Tribulation is coming and nobody will stop it. Defeating the cabal, the swamp, Satan himself, would mean the time of Tribulation would not occur and God would have no reason to judge the world. But it’s coming.
B) The judgment of God falling on the U.S. and the nations is not an example of using His name in vain. It is an observation that aligns with Scripture. All are being judged for rejecting God. This is how we approach the Tribulation.
C) Enlighten me on your beliefs and theories then. Most people who post here mention their personal beliefs and opinions. That’s the point of having a forum. All arguments I make are based on no human entity being able to defeat the swamp/cabal/Satan. If that happened in Scripture, there would be a basis for believing in it, regardless if you agree with other anons here and their theories (or at least the two most popular beliefs—Trump 2024 or Devolution—put forth here).
D) I am a black piller. I am everything you choose to label me. That will not stop the swamp from accomplishing its goals. Like I said before, the SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, CIA, the entire justice system from the top down to the state and local level are under the control and power of Satan. Rigged elections will not be resolved and fixed. Arrests are not coming. Not even in January when the House officially moves on their promised investigations into Hunter and Joe and company. Do you agree? Disagree? Or are you going to rely on “you don’t know what I believe because I never stated them”?
E) Let’s not forget the nothing 🍔 Elon Musk reveal of Biden-corruption-suppression on Twitter via Matt Taibbi that will result in nothing. The more corruption patriots uncover, the more energized they feel that “something is going to happen… because look! It got exposed, and now the world is awakened, and enough people are angry so something has to happen..” all the while Trump’s tax fraud failed to be swept under the rug by the Twitter reveal, and it still made all the headlines.
But I’m sure none of these subjects or topics have anything to do with your beliefs because people here are not allowed to know what you think, or you have no idea what to think about them, right? (which would be the most honest thing on here).
"Satan only has victories and God only has defeats because Satan rules the world."
Not.
And you moved the goalpost so far it's on the other side of the planet now.
Let me remind you of your original premise you completely failed to substantiate in any way, which is: "Nothing anyone posts or exposes means anything meaningful" and imagining everyone here is equally as delusional in that they all throw a party at every victory and wallow in despair at every defeat.
Not all patriots thought WW3 would have zero casualties as you suggest.
Invoking God to bolster a failed argument certainly is.
The tares grow with the wheat until judgement day. In case you are confused, today is not judgement day.
Bad people are running amok. Good people are stopping them to the best of their ability.
The bad people had the advantage for centuries, if not millennia. And they still have much advantage. But with the advent of modern technology, the good guys devised a plan to fight back.
Since you like arguing everything in terms of what God thinks, when God taught us to pray He said "Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven."
And if you were there, you'd rebuke Jesus and tell Him that God's will can't be done on earth, because Satan rules here.
No doomers or shills: If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. - You've confessed yourself that you don't belong here. You should leave and find some messaging forum that allows your black pilling activities.
The purpose is that everyone is moved one inch closer to the precipice, because that's when change becomes possible.
Here's the irony.
Here you are, broadly proclaiming that everything is meaningless, meanwhile you're on top of it all and paying close attention and declaring everything as a failure.
On the other hand, I'm hardly paying attention to any of it, because I know the purpose of everything is to push everyone closer to the precipice.
Tax laws are written to be so convoluted that anyone could be found guilty of anything. Yet, instead of saying most taxes should be abolished like most patriots would, you're siding with the cabal and stating, not only are taxes good, but passing judgement on Trump that he actually engaged in fraud.
People here know what I think because I know how to communicate without violating forum rules and getting myself banned repeatedly.
Example: You used quotations in this statement: "Satan only has victories and God only has defeats because Satan rules the world." I did not say this.
What I am saying, however, is God granted Satan authority over the ruling powers of the world to conduct evil that brings us into the Tribulation and the Great Tribulation. That’s the main idea behind Satan being the “god of this world”: sauce: https://www.gotquestions.org/Satan-god-world.html
You might have a foundational theological differing viewpoint of evil, who conducts it, and how it operates in the world (especially the governing institutions and authorities). For clarity help me understand: how does Christ’s victory at the cross and at the end of the age (what I’m referring to in my entire argument) somehow mean “God only has defeats”? You should want to justify this and answer for this. Otherwise, why are you engaging in discourse with me? What’s the purpose of intentionally misquoting and misrepresenting me? Are you even aware you’re doing it or do you actually believe I made the comment inside your “quotes”?
If you honestly believe that the U.S. and the nations of the world are currently not experiencing judgment from God for rejecting Him (considering the moral state of each nation and the evil they conduct from the top down), then how do you account for the increasing evil and depravity of every nation as we near the so-called precipice, including the Tribulation and GT?
The judgments leading into the Tribulation, during the Tribulation are not the same as the day of final judgment when all stand before God (believers and unbelievers, and get judged according to their unbelief and evil deeds, and those according to righteousness as believers). These are different concepts of judgment and different periods in time.
The bad people had the advantage for centuries, if not millennia. And they still have much advantage. But with the advent of modern technology, the good guys devised a plan to fight back.”
This is evidence of what I’m saying regarding Satan having authority to rule evil and run the world accordingly. Modern technology does not equate to moral progression or increase or even conquering evil. Let me explain:
Because of: 1) internet; 2) social media forums/outlets; 3) news media/outlets; 4) weapon technology; 5) increase of non-biblical ideologies; 6) increase of morally corrupt behavior; 6) crypto currency and more… (including anonymity in emails/communications)… the nations of the world, the leaders of the nations of the world, the citizens of the nations of the world, the media, the military powers, and all the sexual predators and organizations/cartels for drugs and trafficking of human are all interconnected now and can (and do) conduct their evil business on a faster and global scale, especially with the anonymity of currency and other things. Pornography is the best example I can think of immediately.
Now, I’ll grant you that there are good people at all levels who fight against that evil and corruption with the same usage of technology, but the corruption far, far, far outweighs any and all efforts to eliminate it. And it all comes back to the concept of bringing us into the Tribulation. And the precipice we/you speak of as relating to the 2nd great awakening, Q, the white hats, the side of good, the military, etc. does not end with conquering satan, restoring America (and to what exactly? A solely Christian nation void of evil and sin and idolatry? It never was…)… it only moves us closer to the Tribulation, not restoration.
The conundrum or paradox of hoping in saving the country and freeing the world of the cabal is (sorry to say it) a false hope that drives it’s adherents more insane and in more despair as they long for the freedom that only occurs at the very end of the age (even after the final day of judgment mentioned above). Our hope is in Christ, not man… at every level.
Anyway, the Hunter Biden laptop contents are global (thanks to modern technology) and have been for a few years now. The contents of the corruption far outweighs the Twitter suppression and I’ll explain why I believe that:
A) virtually everyone around the globe, world, sphere (sorry, to any flat-earthers) know about the laptop from hell. Even the MSM (or much of it) finally relented to the authenticity of the content (but with much prolonged backpedaling, I’ll grant that too).
B) The nature of the content and corruption is worse than the suppression of the story of the content (regardless of an election), even on a global media outlet such as Twitter. It already made the rounds since then.
What is my point? My point is this: an awakening already happened with the release of the laptop from hell… and what happened? Nothing. What more would a lesser awakening like the Twitter disclosure cause to the effect of finally taking down the cabal? The SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, justice systems from the top down, and governments are ruled by evil (Satan). The only thing an awakening would cause is WWIII with abuse of military and nuclear power (January 6 was a microcosm of what is to come).
God told us what is to come in His Word. We know how to live in this life (in the world not of the world). Anyone in position of power with nuclear access, anyone in the military, whether they are Christian or not, whether they know what is to come or not, is not acting unrighteously by fighting against evil. Am not saying that (in case you might believe that I’m saying that). It is noble. But… ultimate victory is not coming until Christ does away with it after the final judgment at the end of the age. That doesn’t make us lost and without hope (but nor does it mean we take down the cabal).. that brings us closer to Christ and causes us to rely on Him more since we are without the ability to conquer Satan and “take down the cabal.”
Persecution and suffering refine us and strengthen our faith. The apostles who were martyred knew that intimately.
Anyway… The precipice you speak of is not comparable to what is coming in the Tribulation, should you find yourself in the earth at that time or live long enough to see its arrival.
Please try and capture the main point of each point I make if you’re going to engage with me. Ask for clarity if you’re unsure so that you’ll know how to respond to it. I’ve asked you for clarity in this comment so I can better know what you mean, i.e, your beliefs as relating to you potentially getting banned. The reason I pose the question and ask for clarity is this: the nature of the belief(s) in question directly relates to Q, Trump, devolution, military etc. So, do you mean your beliefs on those subjects would get you banned? How would they break the rules? This is what I mean. Does that make sense?
F) You need to start to making & justifying your arguments against my arguments and laying out what you believe if you intend to participate in this discussion in a meaningful way. Stop acting like a wounded animal, get over your emotions, and make an actual argument.
For example:
Person 1: God is judging the world. Satan is the dominating evil power behind the SCOTUS, DOJ, FBI, global elections and, consequently, immoral ideologies are destroying society and humanity. Nobody is going to destroy Satan but Christ in the end. Sauce: https://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html
Person 2: No, you’re a black piller. You’re taking God’s name in vain. You’re just avoided everything and you don’t know my beliefs because I don’t share them.
Person 1: Okay, explain your beliefs and arguments that justify you disagreeing with me.
Do you see why trying to have a meaningful discussion with you is losing my interest. I would not stay this long or keep replying if the topics didn’t matter but they do. If you don’t care enough to state your beliefs, then why attack and disagree with anyone to begin with????
G) Using biblical phrases like “out of context,” and “taking the lord’s name in vain” is not a meaningful response to anything I said. If I had cursed by using the Lord’s name, intentionally rejected Him, blasphemed, or attributed something evil to Him, then, yea, that would be taking His name in vain. You’re obviously biblically illiterate outside of likely having faith in Christ and His life, death, and resurrection, but you chose to act this way and falsely accuse me of something that has not occurred (taking God’s name in vain).
H) If you think my conclusion that God is judging all the nations of the world and that Satan will not be conquered by human beings (but only by Christ at the cross, spiritually, and then at the end of the age in the last judgment in the temporal/physical sense of eliminating evil and the works of Satan in the world) is faulty, then make your counter argument and be concise. Otherwise, I’m losing interest in what you have to say… Not because you think I’m a black-piller, but because you’re not capable of keeping up with the arguments (and you don’t understand the things you say regarding the Word of God).
No I don't. You're already breaking forum rules just being here.
Insinuating that I need to do anything on your behalf is simply silly.
FYI, the only reason I'm typing this much in your direction is to accurately detect the current capabilities of DARPA AI bots.
Invoking God to win political arguments is the epitome of taking the Lord's name in vain.
Millions of miles away from your original premise.
Fortunately for you, I have great interest in AI bots, as they're closely related to my line of work.
Here is an article on the subject of “taking the Lord’s name in vain”: https://www.gotquestions.org/Lords-name-vain.html
I see now that your theological and doctrinal understandings differ from mine. For example, tares among the wheat as relating to the final judgment vs. the Tribulation. Even the subject of taking the Lord’s name in vain as relating to our entire discussion.
You and me are obviously on polar opposites regarding the current state of humanity (politically, religiously, and the nature of Satan’s work behind that). We differ as well on our expectations of the good guys vs. the bad guys, the white hats vs. the black hats, Trump/Q/Q+ and the patriots vs. the swamp/the cabal (intimately the devil and what is granted to him until the final judgment). Wherever your beliefs fall within the spectrum of the patriots/Trump/Q etc., you have an expectation of victory that does not comport with the Bible. I’ve done what I can to lay out how and why that is the case as I see it in Scripture and in reality.
Where am I going with this? Well, you seem to have the impulse of taking the lowest road and accusing me of taking the Lord’s name in vain. I am not convinced you truly believe that. You wrongfully accuse me, once again, of “invoking God to win political arguments.” But when I tell you that the victory you expect is not coming, and then I qualify that with God’s revelation of the future time to come (when Satan’s power in the world system of evil is defeated once and for all), that’s not using the Lord’s name in vain. I’m not politically motivated… but the nature of the discussion heavily involves politics and religion as they relate to the coming Tribulation and what God has ordained to happen to the world (including trumpets and bowl judgments).
Either you accuse me in ignorance, or you do it in defiance. But I’m convinced, either way, you do it because I’m obligated to be labeled as a black-piller. That’s not much different than two Christian’s debating sovereign election and free will and then one accusing the other of not being saved.
The underlying problem as I see it is this: You’re being petty because I “defected,” and you think I should be banned because of it. How are you much different than a leftist or a raging Democrat when your belief system is challenged? Like Dems on Twitter, are you wanting me to be banned? When did I wound you? When was I malicious? I want serious and meaningful discourse. If you do not, then just say so.