I had zero expectations and am therefore not disappointed.
The judge's family will not be harmed.
If the white hats aren't in control after all, we are all fucked. Because they will come after each and every one of us, just for typing things on GA and PDW.
Make no mistake, intelligence knows who you are. You might be able to hide your identity from commercial interests, and in some cases the local yokel law enforcement, but the big intel government operatives, not so much. All digital communication and transactions are tracked - keystrokes and phone call are captured. They only know what we give them and frankly, we have helped them to build the very cage that will enslave us.
You bring up a good possibility there fren - but that is an honest discussion for another day if some are willing to have it.
As far as this trial, Bombard's Body Language released a video about the trial the other day. Body language gives tells as to what is really taking place even if other things say something different. The fix was always in and the outcome was in the bag before the gavel it the bench. At about the 6:40 mark, the judge makes some eye contact with the defense that says it all. https://www.bitchute.com/video/IVwhdBj5ht3P/
The only expectation I had with this trial was that Lake would not win her case. But at least they were allowed to present evidence. The evidence in other cases was dismissed and never saw the light of day.
Normally that is not the only purpose. In this case it obviously is. He had more than enough. Thus just buries the normies heads further up bidens ass. They never admit to the corruption.
Yes, and show the weak points of both sides. This guy is a county judge and close to retirement by the looks of him. How is he going to have a future passing off the county supervisors and county attorney?
We lose from both sides. This judge says the court must "assume the good faith of the election officials' conduct as a matter of law" "All reasonable presumptions must favor validity of elections." then case law is cited.
Yet the kangaroo sham of the January 6 "insurrection" must not consider any of the reasons the people were there, in DC, in the first place.
This country is turning into a Meme in its' entirety. It is such a shame. I do know that the hearing is not a courtroom and the committee itself is a sham, but here we always use the term optics and the January 6th investigation had plenty of optics (fraudulent, but plenty).
I was telling people for the past week to temper your expectations. This judge will not rule in favor of Lake, and it will be appealed to the SCOTUS. Lake's team had facts and experts, Hobbs team had activist. Does Lake have "standing" to bring this to the SCOTUS?
"Standing is a legal term which determines whether the party bringing the lawsuit has the right to do so. Standing is not about the issues, it’s about who is bringing the lawsuit and whether they have legal right to sue. Key to understanding standing is that federal courts have specific jurisdiction over certain issues. As a general rule, federal courts only have authority to hear actual controversies, a term that does not include “political questions.”"
Does Lake have Standing as it is defined? I would say YES!
I had zero expectations and am therefore not disappointed.
The judge's family will not be harmed.
If the white hats aren't in control after all, we are all fucked. Because they will come after each and every one of us, just for typing things on GA and PDW.
Make no mistake, intelligence knows who you are. You might be able to hide your identity from commercial interests, and in some cases the local yokel law enforcement, but the big intel government operatives, not so much. All digital communication and transactions are tracked - keystrokes and phone call are captured. They only know what we give them and frankly, we have helped them to build the very cage that will enslave us.
You bring up a good possibility there fren - but that is an honest discussion for another day if some are willing to have it.
As far as this trial, Bombard's Body Language released a video about the trial the other day. Body language gives tells as to what is really taking place even if other things say something different. The fix was always in and the outcome was in the bag before the gavel it the bench. At about the 6:40 mark, the judge makes some eye contact with the defense that says it all. https://www.bitchute.com/video/IVwhdBj5ht3P/
The only expectation I had with this trial was that Lake would not win her case. But at least they were allowed to present evidence. The evidence in other cases was dismissed and never saw the light of day.
The only purpose of a lower level trial court is to introduce record into evidence for appeal at a later stage.
Normally that is not the only purpose. In this case it obviously is. He had more than enough. Thus just buries the normies heads further up bidens ass. They never admit to the corruption.
Yes, and show the weak points of both sides. This guy is a county judge and close to retirement by the looks of him. How is he going to have a future passing off the county supervisors and county attorney?
BINGO!
I'm so tired of feeling like this. Normies don't have this feeling, so how will they wake up?
That’s a movie.
They won't. It's been that way for centuries.
We lose from both sides. This judge says the court must "assume the good faith of the election officials' conduct as a matter of law" "All reasonable presumptions must favor validity of elections." then case law is cited. Yet the kangaroo sham of the January 6 "insurrection" must not consider any of the reasons the people were there, in DC, in the first place. This country is turning into a Meme in its' entirety. It is such a shame. I do know that the hearing is not a courtroom and the committee itself is a sham, but here we always use the term optics and the January 6th investigation had plenty of optics (fraudulent, but plenty).
I was telling people for the past week to temper your expectations. This judge will not rule in favor of Lake, and it will be appealed to the SCOTUS. Lake's team had facts and experts, Hobbs team had activist. Does Lake have "standing" to bring this to the SCOTUS?
"Standing is a legal term which determines whether the party bringing the lawsuit has the right to do so. Standing is not about the issues, it’s about who is bringing the lawsuit and whether they have legal right to sue. Key to understanding standing is that federal courts have specific jurisdiction over certain issues. As a general rule, federal courts only have authority to hear actual controversies, a term that does not include “political questions.”"
Does Lake have Standing as it is defined? I would say YES!
First to the state Supreme Court, I would think.
Yes, it would need to be appealed to the state, but I have as much faith in that as I do the blackmailed judge that ruled in favor of Hobbs.
Judge is likely captured by the deepstate because he is a pedo.
History will not remember this person.
I think most of us knew this; glad it's coming out though.