3 different “ died suddenly” on CNN’s homepage and the rest will never put it together
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Bonnar was pretty anti vax, so I don't imagine he died due to the shot.
he went to the emergency room seeking pain medication for a broken vertebrae in his back and an injured wrist he sustained two weeks ago in a pro wrestling match. After revealing that he wasn’t vaccinated, he said he was forced to wait for hours because the emergency room doctor had prioritized COVID-19 patients
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/ufc-hall-of-famer-stephan-bonnar-passed-away-december-24-2022-due-to-heart-complications/106139115/
He also tested positive twice for steroids while under contract with UFC. 'Roids can cause heart issues.
I saw his (Bonnar) video from the hospital stating it was food poisoning, or something like that and he was doing better. I was food prepping and husband had it on, so I was only half listening.
Whitworth was also 83…not exactly a young death
Of course they are all baffled.
Everyone's so excited to see these "died suddenly" stories...
Ask yourself, if it didn't suit their narrative would they still be posting these stories?
No...
What does that mean?
They aren't suppressing these stories, which means they want us to know these people are dying suddenly. Are they simply mocking us? Or do these stories have an ulterior motive?
BINGO
Which do you think it is? And if the latter, what ulterior motive may be in play for publishing the stories?
Say a guy is about to turn whistleblower.
Can't have that.
So you off him with the usual heart attack 'guns' the CIA uses.
https://qalerts.app/?q=heart+attack
Only problem, you have a string of usual suspects all in the same line of business getting offed Killary style. Gotta cover your tracks somehow, right?
Died Suddenly comes along as the perfect excuse for why no one is asking how 20 year olds are having their hearts explode. Well, I guess they are asking questions, but they come at it as if they are ALL "vaccine" related deaths.
I'd figure 10% of these stories are assassinations being publicized to set as an example to anyone who might wanna flip. The other 90% are bonafide heart explosions due to the "vaccines."
Three problems, one solution. You get to keep the peons in line by threatening to assassinate them, you get off assassinating people and blaming it on the "vaccines" which the Media is already getting paid to cover for, and you rile up the conspiracy nutters so you can do more hit pieces when they cry "died suddenly."
It's a solid approach, with little we can do to subvert it.
Personally I've thought for a while now that the vaccine is a defense against a future bioweapon, and they can deal an extremely massive blow against us because everyone they don't want around is against the vaccine, while Trump supports it.
We are often busy trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole with why Trump supported the vaccines so much, but sometimes the 4D chess is just..honesty.
We are only immune to propaganda that counters our bias. But when propaganda happens that suits our biases, we tend to eat that more readily. We can see this with fake or incomplete news posted and stickied even while 3 comments down in the thread it is proven to be false, just because it suits our perception and biases.
What happens when they turn that against us?
Well, hopefully we don't find out. I have no intention of getting the clot shot, but those who are willing to question everything and ensure proper discernment have to understand that we are playing a game of chicken and Russian roulette at the same time.
It's possible that the vaccine kills us.
It's possible that the vaccine has a marker to protect us from something they intend for us, and by releasing all these stories and feeding into our biases, they achieve the goals of turning us away from the protection.
The fog of war is thick and disconcerting.
Yes. We don't know anything, even if we think we do, so we can only make peace with our decisions.
People don't like even hearing that they might be wrong (negative imaginary points prove that) but we all have to be able to accept that we might actually be in a no-win situation, at least a no-win when it comes between choosing between those two choices.
I choose not to be jabbed, but I am also willing to admit that it may be possibly the wrong decision for the long term depending on what still may come.
The positive is that I don't have to be a guinea pig for experimental drugs, the negative is that something unforeseen could happen.
But I can't make a decision based on what we aren't seeing, with possibilities in the future. I have to make decisions based on what we see now, that shows that the vaccinations are dangerous now. That's just the lot I've thrown.
To be honest I can't imagine anyone but anons,going to CNN 's homepage.
True that.
They're preparing the narrative for the super-scary (and fake) vaxstrain bolognavirus, which will cause so many celebrities and blue check marks to "die" that they'll have no choice but to cancel in-person voting for 2024.
Wait! was that flight attendant on Epstein's plane ?
None so blind as those who will not see.
Idk about Bonnar; heard he was pretty anti-vax.
Steroids arent good for you either.
The golfer, Kathy Whitworth, was 83. I'll give the benefit of the doubt on that one.
The others, yeah, it's the jab.
EDIT: Except Bonnar. My mistake.
Bonnar was very publicly anti-vax and didn’t get the jab
You're right, I forgot about that. Sorry.