Rolling Stone posts panicked article about "QAnon", citing specific members here, due to connecting dots between Beatles, Crowley, Child Sacrifice, & the Tavistock Institute. In an effort to disprove us, they managed to do the opposite and just spread research to the normies. We Are The News Now.
(www.rollingstone.com)
WE ARE THE NEWS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (207)
sorted by:
What is JOS?
Short for Juan O Savin... A well known paytriot grifter who surrounds themself in mystique and frequently pushes all the crap mentioned in the Rolling Stone article: NESARA/GESARA, JFK Jr crap, medbeds and other clandestine technology, the whole USA Inc vs USA narrative and a bunch of other unproven shit that anons have researched and either came up with dead ends or outright debunked.
Dude's a pay to play sophist who brings nothing to the table other than misleading anons and giving MSM ammo to use against anons.
I would have to disagree.
Anons work for free. Better put, paytriots are no different than the MSM. Paid infotainment by and for the consumer.
Anons don’t make TV shows and podcasts that come out on a weekly or even daily schedule that you watch as entertainment. Once someone is doing that, selling ads or taking donations from your viewers does not seem unreasonable to me. They are creating a product that you are willingly paying for! Also, many of these people put their products out for free and only ask that you try to support their sponsors. Flecca’s Talks for example prioritizes America First, Made in USA advertisers, which is something we advocate here all the time. Beyond that, their podcast is free and if you want to help them out, they have a bonus hour behind a paywall in addition to their regular weekly show. They also sell merch but you are under no obligation to buy it. What is the problem here?