I'm not gonna try and make predictions, but people need to stop jumping to the very first conclusion anyone comes to on this type of thing. So yeah, Bolsonaro may not "have institutional support" officially, but are we forgetting all of the weird shady crap going on where the Brazilian military more or less took out the cartels that helped rig the election, as well as all the generals who came out and said they will not allow lula to take office.
And let's not forget when the corrupt police force was attacking Brazilian civilians, who stepped in to defend them? The Brazilian Military. For all we know, this may be a ploy for "plausible deniability" on the part of Bolsonaro.
"Oh no one supports me so there's nothing I can do". Then all of his supporters in the Brazilian military step in and just perform a counter coup. And of course, during all of this he has to be kept safe, and where else in the world would be safer than with Trump in Mar A Lago? Especially since all the evidence points towards Trump still being president and having infinitely better security than the resident.
Now I could be wrong, I know what you all know of course, but I think this is at least a moderately likely scenario. Bolsonaro "steps aside" for a bit, Brazilian military cleans house in counter coup while Bolsonaro is safe in what essentially amounts to the actual white house. Bolsonaro takes his rightful place as president of Brazil. Rinse and repeat in every other cabal-controlled nation.
The dooming is not yet merited, especially with all the evidence, INCLUDING ACTUAL BOOTS ON THE GROUND ACTION, that we have witnessed in regards to the Brazil situation.
Just my two cents on the issue.
So stop setting expectations?
Perhaps the merchantry of pointless copium should stop being propped up, because the expectation ends up being set for people whether they intend it to be set for them or not. Especially when pointing out something like this is just a fantasy often ends up with the label "doomer" being tossed around, as if there is no room for a realistic outlook based on the fact that is constantly slapped in our faces.
Yup.
5G warfare
Has anyone asked themselves how Bolsonaro is being allowed into the country to visit Trump? Since he's Brazil's version of Trump, and is a direct enemy of the DS, don't you think Pedo Joe's CCP bosses should be telling him to deny Bolsonaro entry into the US?
Just asking a simple question.
Or cultivate, through superior mojo, a set of balls with a low center of gravity and a shit-load of inertia and fashioned from motherfucking brass (with a built in barometer)
and then.....
Datefag and planefag and shipfag and NCSWIC fag giving nary a fuck !
Top tier fuckery, my fren
Cheers fren.
It's is the way !
Faggots too worried to have hope or formulate a theory and float it around here are not even playing the game. Their brains are inert.
Or adjusting them. The Cabal and the Deep State have been around for centuries. They're not going to mopped up in just a few months, or even years. Undoing what they have done will take a long, long time. It may take decades before it is completely overthrown. I probably won't live to see it, but I think my grandkids will. This is the true red pill.
Imagine thinking that a legacy can't be ended in a very short time by targeting people directly involved.
Lines of kings have ruled for decades and centuries in the past; their legacies were snuffed out by killing them and their families in an instant.
No matter how much adrenochrome they consume, these people are not immortal. They do not last forever. Their legacy does have an end, and if one has "everything", then it becomes easy to dismantle them when you go to the extremes. If it's not easy, then maybe not everything is had.
America will fall by the passage of "decades" like this.
The nuclear age changed that. What does asymmetrical warfare look like if your opponent might have dirty bombs in major metropolitan areas?
Maybe were seeing blackmail on a global scale backed by total annihilation.
If you have everything, you should be able to counter that.
"Everything" is not a suggestion, it isn't a word that falls short. It encompasses "everything".
Agree.
You're wrong. It's far easier to destroy something than it is to build it, even something evil and far-reaching.