I've been posting this hypothetical since last week! Matt Gaetz has been very verbal about a No McCarthy Speakership. This may be part of The Plan. Matt Gaetz is the ring leader of those 20 hold out Repubs. Is Gaetz tasked with the hold out uuntil the SCOTUS views/rules on the Brunson case? It seems there is a definite chess game and this may be one of the moves!
Can anyone envision 388 members of congress/senate being removed from the corrupt DC political system? Trump; 'Fast & Swift'...and...'Law & Order...'...and 'America's comeback starts right now...'
Friday is just the conference. They have to read it first and then vote on if they want to move it to a full 9 Justice hearing. Mind you, SCOTUS only reads less than 25% of the cases brought to Conference, so if this gets read and voted to move forward it's a massive win. They only need 4 Yes votes to move it on, and they should get that with no problem. The process will not affect how Government works until there is an actual ruling.
Yes, that's why they used rule 11 and SCOTUS took it. The 10th circuit was sitting on it and as soon as the SCOTUS took it under 11 the 10th panicked and said they will allow it to move to SCOTUS. At that point, SCOTUS told them they can remove rule 11. The 10th circuit court was stalling moving if forward for sure. I feel it has a good chance of being read and voted to move forward.
I think there are many factors at play that are not being revealed by the MSM and the players involved. This unprecedented delay nominating the speaker running congruent to the Brunson case certainly is not coincidental.
If SCOTUS takes up the Brunson case it will definitely affect the way government works, one way or another.
Along these lines, I've been trying to locate the names of the congressional members (about 100) who were asking for the investigation along with Jordan and Comer. Does anyone have that list or know where to find it?
I’ve often wondered why the Founding Fathers never wrote specifically that the Speaker MUST be from the House of Representatives. I’m no Constitutional Scholar, I look things up in my Pocket Constitution all the time; but that is the only place I can think of they weren’t specific.
What if the Mil are persuading SCOTUS to do the right thing. Why would SCOTUS even take this Case? Just asking because it doesn't make any sense to me why this Case is even being reviewed on a historic date of January 6th, 2023 two years after the Capital fiasco of January 6th, 2021.
I've been posting this hypothetical since last week! Matt Gaetz has been very verbal about a No McCarthy Speakership. This may be part of The Plan. Matt Gaetz is the ring leader of those 20 hold out Repubs. Is Gaetz tasked with the hold out uuntil the SCOTUS views/rules on the Brunson case? It seems there is a definite chess game and this may be one of the moves!
Can anyone envision 388 members of congress/senate being removed from the corrupt DC political system? Trump; 'Fast & Swift'...and...'Law & Order...'...and 'America's comeback starts right now...'
Hell of a sting operation!
It would certainly grab a lot of attention. In a good way.
Friday is just the conference. They have to read it first and then vote on if they want to move it to a full 9 Justice hearing. Mind you, SCOTUS only reads less than 25% of the cases brought to Conference, so if this gets read and voted to move forward it's a massive win. They only need 4 Yes votes to move it on, and they should get that with no problem. The process will not affect how Government works until there is an actual ruling.
They took it in under "emergency" procedures. Regular rules go by the wayside.
Yes, that's why they used rule 11 and SCOTUS took it. The 10th circuit was sitting on it and as soon as the SCOTUS took it under 11 the 10th panicked and said they will allow it to move to SCOTUS. At that point, SCOTUS told them they can remove rule 11. The 10th circuit court was stalling moving if forward for sure. I feel it has a good chance of being read and voted to move forward.
I think there are many factors at play that are not being revealed by the MSM and the players involved. This unprecedented delay nominating the speaker running congruent to the Brunson case certainly is not coincidental.
If SCOTUS takes up the Brunson case it will definitely affect the way government works, one way or another.
This 👆what owellian say!
Along these lines, I've been trying to locate the names of the congressional members (about 100) who were asking for the investigation along with Jordan and Comer. Does anyone have that list or know where to find it?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2021/politics/congress-electoral-college-count-tracker/
Filed under "possible uncharted territory", though it seems unlikely that there isn't a constitutional process in place to cover every base.
I’ve often wondered why the Founding Fathers never wrote specifically that the Speaker MUST be from the House of Representatives. I’m no Constitutional Scholar, I look things up in my Pocket Constitution all the time; but that is the only place I can think of they weren’t specific.
Let’s hope. Clear the swamp.
The clerk of court has seen the merit and as i just learned in another post the case only got there because of him. Dudes middle name is session's.
😳
Brian Cates has stated that the Brunson case has zero chance of success:
https://truthsocial.com/users/BrianCates/statuses/109634966909790189
I would rather take Naval strategy advice from the guy on the Capt. Crunch cereal box than listen to Cates.
Capt crunch has been weathered strong by the mighty seas. Gaaaargh!
And those glass shards he calls cereal.
LOL!! Yes! Most mouth pain causing cereal of all time
Allow me to state that Brian Cates has no credibility.
I don't understand why people think this really has a chance. Extremely unlikely, as Cates/Beanz/UncoverDC has stated.
If they refused to hear cases that had actual merit, what makes people think they'll hear this one? 😆
What if the Mil are persuading SCOTUS to do the right thing. Why would SCOTUS even take this Case? Just asking because it doesn't make any sense to me why this Case is even being reviewed on a historic date of January 6th, 2023 two years after the Capital fiasco of January 6th, 2021.
Really.
he is fake and gay