Glenbrook hospital in Glenview IL killed my friend 53 yo healthy male w 2 children. The kids begged for HCQ or IVM , hospital wouldnt let him have it and gave him Remdesiver, kidneys shut down and couldn't breathe, ventilator.
People really need to stop going to hospitals. All of us know people who have been killed by doctors. We don't trust globohomo pharma so why should we trust hospitals? They are no better.
We should instead eat clean exercise and pray regularly. God gave us all immune systems amd I believe in Him over corrupt doctors.
My MIL got the same treatment. They did not tell us what she was getting. She went to the hospital with trouble breathing. Three days later, ventilator. Seven days later, nurses were recommending we pull the plug.
Same here. Had it late December 2021. I was not in horrible shape,
But had to get hospitalized for pneumonia. Fukin doctor talked me into it. Didnt experience issues and No side affects so far BUT!!! … When I got my hospital bill for those 4 days the pharmacy bill was $11K. $9900 of that was Remdesivir. I asked my DiL who worked in billing if that was right. She said, not only was it correct, the hospital got a $$’bonus’ for prescribing it. That shit is as big a fucking money scam as anything. If I knew that shit then I would have told that dude to get fuked.
I was in the hospital for 13 days and the bill was over $160k. Thankfully my insurance is effing amazing. The hospital wouldn't even treat me until I agreed to take remdesivir. Once I reached the point where I thought I was for sure going to die, I said screw it, I'll take it. Only then would they even GIVE ME OXYGEN, so I started getting better after that. No doubt, they count it as a Remdesivir success.
This is scary. But... I need more clarification. I KNOW Remdesivir is a killer. But I need specifics before I start making claims to family and friends based on this article.
It states that Remdesivir killed 53% of the Remdesivir Treatment Group. What does "Treatment Group" mean? Were these people already sick with something, and going to die which is why R was administered? Or, is this a control group and R was given to them causing 53% to die from R, itself? THAT is what I'm hoping (sadly) is the case. But it doesn't state that.
And, it killed 86% off those it was given to who began the trial with Ebola already in their blood. Well, were these people going to die, anyway? Again, same questions... what role, exactly, did R play in their death. Simple correlation is one thing, but to be able to state that it caused the death is more profound.
My brother was admitted to the hospital in 2021 and given Remdesivir for 3 days and after he refused the vent, was released.
He's doing well, no issues with his kidneys, but does have some lingering breathing issues (he also has asthma and an inhaler) that pop up from time to time.
He's not vaccinated.
Yes, thank you, we are all relieved that he's doing well.
One of the doctor's that were there when he was admitted, came in to his room (after he refused the ventilator) and said to him that "he dodged a bullet" by doing that.
Unbelievable what they were doing to people during that time and how they knew what it would do to them when they were put on the vent.
Thanks... From the article: "From November 20, 2018, to August 9, 2019, a total of 681 patients were enrolled and underwent randomization at Ebola treatment centers in Beni (335 patients), Butembo (243 patients), Katwa (46 patients), and Mangina (57 patients)."
That suggests that these were ebola-positive patients already at ebola treatment centers.
Remdesivir failed miserably. BUT, it is not stating that the Remdesivir killed them. I don't doubt that it expedited the death and increased the death rate, but it's not as explicitly stated as I would like to see, or how it's summarized in that Twitter clip.
I just don't want to be accused by someone smarter than me about this stuff that I fell for a talking point that was a misleading summary.
My understanding is that Remdesivir can cause the kidneys to shut down. Then fluid can collect in the lungs and a patient can't breath. We can't discount the financial incentive to prescribe Remdesivir and deploy the ventilators.
I don't doubt that. In fact, I am familiar with how R caused kidney failure among Covid patients, and the docs all thought it was covid (or they were told it was) yada yada.
Remdesivir is NOT GOOD. In fact, it is VERY BAD. I know!
My point is that this study and headline is misleading.
You’re 100% right, your comments should be the only ones on this post. The guy in the video is spewing fake news that delegitimizes the truths we speak.
You're exactly right in your interpretation. The study results do not show that remdesivir killed them, but rather than remdesivir failed to stop ebola virus from killing them.
Even then i wouldnt say it failed miserably. It performed similarly across the board to zmapp, within 3%.
The study wasnt apples to apples either. The REGN group was 12% smaller, so the group sizes werent even the same, and 10% of the other groups were later found out to have malaria.
This was a trial of 4 drugs to treat ebola virus. Find patients with ebola, then give 1 of the 4 drugs, see what happens. We have to remember, however, that ebola is a deadly disease. Depending on the specific strain, mortality rates have varied from 25-90%. That's your baseline. 25-90% bleed out and die because of this virus.
Now, scroll down to Table 2 in that study. They present the mortality in the experimental groups, broken down by viral load: high and low, and an overall mortality. That's where this 53% is coming from. If you look at the MZapp group, you'll see a similar mortality rate. MZapp is a combination of 3 monoclonal antibodies, so it works totally differently than remdesivir. 51.3% mortality.
Now, if you go to the Safety subsection of the Results (or Table S7 of the Supplemental), it lists one serious adverse effect for remdesivir: a hypotension (loss of blood pressure) event. Ebola virus itself kills people by destroying the vascular system and causing people to bleed out. Doctors could not say that the remdesivir caused the hypotension and not the disease itself. We don't have much more data on safety and that's likely because the baseline disease is so nasty.
The dishonest lawyer is trying to claim that remdesivir was killing patients, but there's no evidence of that here. The statistic he uses shows only that remdesivir was not very effective in treating ebola virus. It was just as ineffective as a 3 monoclonal antibody cocktail, and there was no distinct safety signal in this study because of the nature of the ebola itself.
If you want to show remdesivir is unsafe for COVID, we need evidence from a trial where it's used in COVID.
My understanding is the Remdesivir Treatment Group were infected with ebola and recieved remdesivir. 53% of them died. If the person had a very high level of the virus and recieved remdesivir then 86% died.
This page says the mortality rate for ebola ranges from about 40-60%, so that 86% seems high. But maybe they were already that much sicker when they started the treatment?
I don't think the article is a smoking gun and wouldn't use it as an example of remdesivir's risks.
FDA refused to certify Remdesevir for Ebola because it killed. It always killed humans. The only use it has (a variation of it) is it cures feline FIPS.
I don't doubt that. In fact, I am familiar with how R caused kidney failure among Covid patients, and the docs all thought it was covid (or they were told it was) yada yada.
Remdesivir is NOT GOOD. In fact, it is VERY BAD. I know!
My point is that this study and headline is misleading.
They tried to get me to take that in the hospital. I asked them if they needed my bed that desperately I refused and lived that week. I was only one out of four people on my unit who didn’t die of Covid.
Do you know the history of Remdesevir. Where it came from? Gilead Sciences. A lot of the history has been recently re-written that it was used to treat Ebola. BS. Do not fall for that. It killed for Ebola and was removed. Never got FDA for that.
That class of chemical was orginally designed to cure feline FIPS out of UC Davis. Dr. Pedersen was working on that since 2015. Gilead ws under contract to use this molecule to treat a number of diff. viral ifnections. The only one that worked was the one for cats. None for humans was ever safe enuf, killed.
Tthat veterinary medication under test was halted in August 2019, way b4 Covid hit. UC Davis also sued. The original vet med was extremely toxic, and $$$$$, had to be used with care.
www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/05/remdesivir-cats/611341/
"The second remarkable thing is that GS-441524 is almost identical to a much buzzed-about human drug: remdesivir, the antiviral currently our best hope for treating COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus."
Fauci forced remdesvir into the WH in 2020 - IMO an assassination attempt against President Trump and his adminstiration.
"Gilead invented and patented GS-441524, too. Its scientists co-authored the UC Davis studies showing effectiveness against FIP. But the company has refused to license GS-441524 for animal use, out of fear that its similarity to remdesivir could interfere with the human drug’s FDA-approval process—originally for Ebola. When that failed, "
*The point is: they took a vet medicine and made it for Ebola that failed and killed, then they made it for Covid, and that failed and killed... meanwhile Fluffies all over the world with FIP's didn't get their meds and died. *
The thing to see though is how these scum won't bear any liability because they are so many steps removed from the actual administration of the drug into the patients. They didn't directly kill anyone. They just put out sound bytes. They hold themselves completely innocent.
This info should be stickied, and placed on signs wielded by millions of protestors.
I mean really, this is mass murder. I feel like not just normies but us too- everyone has something wrong with them to where we don't realize just how bad something is and/or our attention spans are too fucked up to care as much as we should.
It should be stickied, but for a different purpose. This is clickbait and gross misinformation from a lawyer who damn well should know better. This study does NOT show that remdesivir killed 50% of patients. It shows that ebola killed 50% of patients and remdesivir failed to stop it. There's no control group so we can't specify a baseline mortality rate. We can only infer it is ~50% because another treatment also had a 50% mortality rate in the same study. That drug also failed.
The safety signal was difficult to distinguish because ebola is such a nasty disease at baseline. Look at table S7 of the Supplemental in this study. Only one event was deemed possibly related, and the disease itself could easily have caused it.
You're making a "mass murder" claim which is totally unsupported by this study. That's not to say there wasn't an effort to milk the hell out of COVID to boost mortality numbers. There absolutely was such an effort to manipulate the data in order to ratchet up fear and thus justify police state-style surveillance and control policies. But again, this study doesn't show that.
Yeah I knew I should have waited until I had time to actually look into it. I stand by the rest of my point including mass murder though, just not by way of remdesivir. It's crazy to me that hella people know what they've done with the vax (though not even the full extent yet) but we just talk about it on the internet like "ah these assholes" lol. Same goes for everything else besides COVID and the vax that many people know about.
Remdesivir = Run Death is Near
Ok, now that is perfect!
Glenbrook hospital in Glenview IL killed my friend 53 yo healthy male w 2 children. The kids begged for HCQ or IVM , hospital wouldnt let him have it and gave him Remdesiver, kidneys shut down and couldn't breathe, ventilator.
It took 11 days
A Pennsy hospital got my older, healthy brother. No vax, no treatment.
People really need to stop going to hospitals. All of us know people who have been killed by doctors. We don't trust globohomo pharma so why should we trust hospitals? They are no better.
We should instead eat clean exercise and pray regularly. God gave us all immune systems amd I believe in Him over corrupt doctors.
My MIL got the same treatment. They did not tell us what she was getting. She went to the hospital with trouble breathing. Three days later, ventilator. Seven days later, nurses were recommending we pull the plug.
I need to get a T shirt that says "I survived Remdesivir."
I survived myself, I hear you
Same here. Had it late December 2021. I was not in horrible shape, But had to get hospitalized for pneumonia. Fukin doctor talked me into it. Didnt experience issues and No side affects so far BUT!!! … When I got my hospital bill for those 4 days the pharmacy bill was $11K. $9900 of that was Remdesivir. I asked my DiL who worked in billing if that was right. She said, not only was it correct, the hospital got a $$’bonus’ for prescribing it. That shit is as big a fucking money scam as anything. If I knew that shit then I would have told that dude to get fuked.
I was in the hospital for 13 days and the bill was over $160k. Thankfully my insurance is effing amazing. The hospital wouldn't even treat me until I agreed to take remdesivir. Once I reached the point where I thought I was for sure going to die, I said screw it, I'll take it. Only then would they even GIVE ME OXYGEN, so I started getting better after that. No doubt, they count it as a Remdesivir success.
Now THAT is pure fucking medical extortion. Bastard muther fukers are all gonna rot in hell.
Only $1100 for 4 days of hospital stay!?!? Damn that's cheap
No, it was $11,000 for the medicines. The entire bill was like $89,000
This is scary. But... I need more clarification. I KNOW Remdesivir is a killer. But I need specifics before I start making claims to family and friends based on this article.
It states that Remdesivir killed 53% of the Remdesivir Treatment Group. What does "Treatment Group" mean? Were these people already sick with something, and going to die which is why R was administered? Or, is this a control group and R was given to them causing 53% to die from R, itself? THAT is what I'm hoping (sadly) is the case. But it doesn't state that.
And, it killed 86% off those it was given to who began the trial with Ebola already in their blood. Well, were these people going to die, anyway? Again, same questions... what role, exactly, did R play in their death. Simple correlation is one thing, but to be able to state that it caused the death is more profound.
Just being an Anon. Thanks for posting.
My brother was admitted to the hospital in 2021 and given Remdesivir for 3 days and after he refused the vent, was released.
He's doing well, no issues with his kidneys, but does have some lingering breathing issues (he also has asthma and an inhaler) that pop up from time to time. He's not vaccinated.
I am so glad that your brother is okay!
Yes, thank you, we are all relieved that he's doing well.
One of the doctor's that were there when he was admitted, came in to his room (after he refused the ventilator) and said to him that "he dodged a bullet" by doing that.
Unbelievable what they were doing to people during that time and how they knew what it would do to them when they were put on the vent.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993 Links to Protocol and Appendix within artlcle.
Thanks... From the article: "From November 20, 2018, to August 9, 2019, a total of 681 patients were enrolled and underwent randomization at Ebola treatment centers in Beni (335 patients), Butembo (243 patients), Katwa (46 patients), and Mangina (57 patients)."
That suggests that these were ebola-positive patients already at ebola treatment centers.
Remdesivir failed miserably. BUT, it is not stating that the Remdesivir killed them. I don't doubt that it expedited the death and increased the death rate, but it's not as explicitly stated as I would like to see, or how it's summarized in that Twitter clip.
I just don't want to be accused by someone smarter than me about this stuff that I fell for a talking point that was a misleading summary.
Some links for you:
https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.2145
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/140c9TRQ5w/dr-ardis-interview--death-by-rem/c
My understanding is that Remdesivir can cause the kidneys to shut down. Then fluid can collect in the lungs and a patient can't breath. We can't discount the financial incentive to prescribe Remdesivir and deploy the ventilators.
I don't doubt that. In fact, I am familiar with how R caused kidney failure among Covid patients, and the docs all thought it was covid (or they were told it was) yada yada.
Remdesivir is NOT GOOD. In fact, it is VERY BAD. I know!
My point is that this study and headline is misleading.
You’re 100% right, your comments should be the only ones on this post. The guy in the video is spewing fake news that delegitimizes the truths we speak.
Thanks... that's a boost to my confidence posting here!
You're exactly right in your interpretation. The study results do not show that remdesivir killed them, but rather than remdesivir failed to stop ebola virus from killing them.
Even then i wouldnt say it failed miserably. It performed similarly across the board to zmapp, within 3%.
The study wasnt apples to apples either. The REGN group was 12% smaller, so the group sizes werent even the same, and 10% of the other groups were later found out to have malaria.
It's a good thing to ask for details because the details matter. What this lawyer is doing is dishonest and it needs to be clarified.
He's referring to: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993
This was a trial of 4 drugs to treat ebola virus. Find patients with ebola, then give 1 of the 4 drugs, see what happens. We have to remember, however, that ebola is a deadly disease. Depending on the specific strain, mortality rates have varied from 25-90%. That's your baseline. 25-90% bleed out and die because of this virus.
Now, scroll down to Table 2 in that study. They present the mortality in the experimental groups, broken down by viral load: high and low, and an overall mortality. That's where this 53% is coming from. If you look at the MZapp group, you'll see a similar mortality rate. MZapp is a combination of 3 monoclonal antibodies, so it works totally differently than remdesivir. 51.3% mortality.
Now, if you go to the Safety subsection of the Results (or Table S7 of the Supplemental), it lists one serious adverse effect for remdesivir: a hypotension (loss of blood pressure) event. Ebola virus itself kills people by destroying the vascular system and causing people to bleed out. Doctors could not say that the remdesivir caused the hypotension and not the disease itself. We don't have much more data on safety and that's likely because the baseline disease is so nasty.
The dishonest lawyer is trying to claim that remdesivir was killing patients, but there's no evidence of that here. The statistic he uses shows only that remdesivir was not very effective in treating ebola virus. It was just as ineffective as a 3 monoclonal antibody cocktail, and there was no distinct safety signal in this study because of the nature of the ebola itself.
If you want to show remdesivir is unsafe for COVID, we need evidence from a trial where it's used in COVID.
My understanding is the Remdesivir Treatment Group were infected with ebola and recieved remdesivir. 53% of them died. If the person had a very high level of the virus and recieved remdesivir then 86% died.
This page says the mortality rate for ebola ranges from about 40-60%, so that 86% seems high. But maybe they were already that much sicker when they started the treatment?
I don't think the article is a smoking gun and wouldn't use it as an example of remdesivir's risks.
FDA refused to certify Remdesevir for Ebola because it killed. It always killed humans. The only use it has (a variation of it) is it cures feline FIPS.
I don't doubt that. In fact, I am familiar with how R caused kidney failure among Covid patients, and the docs all thought it was covid (or they were told it was) yada yada.
Remdesivir is NOT GOOD. In fact, it is VERY BAD. I know!
My point is that this study and headline is misleading.
They tried to get me to take that in the hospital. I asked them if they needed my bed that desperately I refused and lived that week. I was only one out of four people on my unit who didn’t die of Covid.
Hang them slowly in increments until dead.
Do you know the history of Remdesevir. Where it came from? Gilead Sciences. A lot of the history has been recently re-written that it was used to treat Ebola. BS. Do not fall for that. It killed for Ebola and was removed. Never got FDA for that.
That class of chemical was orginally designed to cure feline FIPS out of UC Davis. Dr. Pedersen was working on that since 2015. Gilead ws under contract to use this molecule to treat a number of diff. viral ifnections. The only one that worked was the one for cats. None for humans was ever safe enuf, killed.
Tthat veterinary medication under test was halted in August 2019, way b4 Covid hit. UC Davis also sued. The original vet med was extremely toxic, and $$$$$, had to be used with care.
www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/05/remdesivir-cats/611341/ "The second remarkable thing is that GS-441524 is almost identical to a much buzzed-about human drug: remdesivir, the antiviral currently our best hope for treating COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus."
Fauci forced remdesvir into the WH in 2020 - IMO an assassination attempt against President Trump and his adminstiration.
"Gilead invented and patented GS-441524, too. Its scientists co-authored the UC Davis studies showing effectiveness against FIP. But the company has refused to license GS-441524 for animal use, out of fear that its similarity to remdesivir could interfere with the human drug’s FDA-approval process—originally for Ebola. When that failed, "
*The point is: they took a vet medicine and made it for Ebola that failed and killed, then they made it for Covid, and that failed and killed... meanwhile Fluffies all over the world with FIP's didn't get their meds and died. *
https://twitter.com/redvoicenews/status/1613155970926129152?s=20
My point wrt Remdesvir is that it always killed humans. The precursor to that only saved cats with feline FIPS. Period. And they know.
Need to make a list of the jab injecters and addresses.
The thing to see though is how these scum won't bear any liability because they are so many steps removed from the actual administration of the drug into the patients. They didn't directly kill anyone. They just put out sound bytes. They hold themselves completely innocent.
This info should be stickied, and placed on signs wielded by millions of protestors.
I mean really, this is mass murder. I feel like not just normies but us too- everyone has something wrong with them to where we don't realize just how bad something is and/or our attention spans are too fucked up to care as much as we should.
It should be stickied, but for a different purpose. This is clickbait and gross misinformation from a lawyer who damn well should know better. This study does NOT show that remdesivir killed 50% of patients. It shows that ebola killed 50% of patients and remdesivir failed to stop it. There's no control group so we can't specify a baseline mortality rate. We can only infer it is ~50% because another treatment also had a 50% mortality rate in the same study. That drug also failed.
The safety signal was difficult to distinguish because ebola is such a nasty disease at baseline. Look at table S7 of the Supplemental in this study. Only one event was deemed possibly related, and the disease itself could easily have caused it.
You're making a "mass murder" claim which is totally unsupported by this study. That's not to say there wasn't an effort to milk the hell out of COVID to boost mortality numbers. There absolutely was such an effort to manipulate the data in order to ratchet up fear and thus justify police state-style surveillance and control policies. But again, this study doesn't show that.
Yeah I knew I should have waited until I had time to actually look into it. I stand by the rest of my point including mass murder though, just not by way of remdesivir. It's crazy to me that hella people know what they've done with the vax (though not even the full extent yet) but we just talk about it on the internet like "ah these assholes" lol. Same goes for everything else besides COVID and the vax that many people know about.
prey