“That infringement threatens not just significant monetary damages, but the potential for injunctive relief that would threaten Twitter’s ongoing business as currently operated.”
This feels like an extremely important part of this story that no one is even discussing. What ended up happening here?
“Mr. Zatko alleges that:
Twitter’s platform is built in significant part on the misappropriation and infringement of third party intellectual property”
https://twitter.com/sparklingruby/status/1620625924097179649?s=20&t=8yV-HY-qn0MdTaQQOI5iTQ
If there is some kind of infringement, to me it indicates the black tech that came from CIA.
We know that Facebook came from Lifelog which was a DARPA project. I am sure the same is true for Twitter, Google, Amazon etc
Even if they didn't originally I have no doubt that they were perverted and propped up
As an experienced software engineer having seen all kinds of projects - big and small - I can tell you one thing. The implementation of the tech in Google and Amazon especially did not happen in a normal project. They had access to infinite money tap for one thing, and the tech took at least 20 years - I am specifically talking about Amazon AWS and Google search platform.
Section 4.14. Intellectual Property. In the Merger Agreement, Twitter represented, inter alia, that it was not infringing the intellectual property of others (the “Non-Infringement Rep”) and that it was in compliance with all applicable data privacy and protection requirements (the “Data Privacy Rep”). Both representations were apparently false when made on the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the date of the July 8 Termination Notice, and both continue to be inaccurate. As revealed by the Zatko Complaint, Twitter apparently never acquired the rights to Twitter’s core machine learning models, which the Musk Parties understand to be fundamental to the Twitter platform itself. That infringement threatens not just significant monetary damages, but the potential for injunctive relief that would threaten Twitter’s ongoing business as currently operated. Either alone would be a Company Material Adverse Effect under the terms of the Merger Agreement. Similarly, the Zatko Complaint lays out widespread, egregious violations of the data privacy protections that a company like Twitter is expected—and, indeed, legally required—to have in place. This would be a gross violation of trust by the Twitter platform that will have legal and commercial consequences, and which also gives rise to a Company Material Adverse Effect under the terms of the Merger Agreement.
https://t.co/lUEsYEFEdq
The fact that Elon went ahead with the merger indicates to me that behind the scenes there was agreement to rectify this. Would be interesting to see what / how its done.
These files are public.
Maybe people will learn that it wasn't some organically-created tool for people to communicate and share quick ideas, but rather a CIA-created honeypot to gather information from many millions of people, and to also influence and brainwash those many millions of people with an army of bots. Hopefully they'll also learn that about Facebook, and that Dorsey/Zuckerberg were merely the public faces for those information gathering tools.
I believe that is what happened. The CIA is at the core to spy on people.
or that The CIA stole the tech from someone elas and then told Jack to " add this code to your platform" not telling them that CIA stole it is a bit lake a honey trap once Twitter had built significantly more code dependant on the stolen code.. CIA sort of had them by their feathery little balls...
Are you assuming that twatter was created organically by Dorsey?
I Don't know that Ibwould go that far.
117% a CIA / DoD creation.