I used to be very active here, but I just needed to put my energy and time elsewhere for a little while, but before we were always able to rightly criticize anyone who deserves it. Which is how it should be...
Coincidentally as always some Jew typically is behind the bullshit. That isn't our fault lol we can only point out what we see with our own eyes...
I literally got a one day ban for criticizing this community and then another day ban for attempting to appeal it. This place has been compromised. And just the other day Catsfive makes a sticky post repeating the same exact concerns I got banned for saying.
And all Italians are Mafia, by this logic. It is your fault to use the crimes of a few to blame all. This is collectivism, and it is a major intellectual and moral fault.
Just replace a word: "Coincidentally as always some White Man is behind slavery. That isn't our fault lol we can only point out what we see with our own eyes."
Why create unnecessary resistance to a truth with your word choice though? Why not be more precise is your verbiage? I like calling them JINOs. It fosters conversation, reduces knee jerk reactions, and bypasses the “antisemitism” verbal gambit. “No. These guys only say they’re Jews to deflect criticism.” “No I’m not antisemitic. I have no problem with Jews. I have a problem with Satanists/Communists/Zionists/Etc, who only say they’re Jews to avoid criticism.”
Why dig in your heels in the name of your truth when you can be so much more persuasive with a minor course correction?
You anti-Semites are almost humorous. In one breath you say "everyone knows that jews are not collectively as a people furthering the global agenda." And then immediately afterward you say "the jewish people are revolutionaries...they were kicked out of...many Countries." Except those who were not furthering the global agenda? Or just...all of them? (Curiously, you seem to have no understanding of the phenomenon of the Unbelieving Jew and what that inclines them toward, but I will let that go.)
Only "fucking morons" think that my point was to argue that white men are slavers. It was to construct an exact analog to the anti-Semite argument that all Jews are global monsters, to reveal the logical fallacy involved. ("Some A are criminals. Therefore, all A are criminals.") Or, to make it again clear, "Everyone knows that all Italians are not collectively as a people furthering the Mafia." Yep, we do know it. And we don't rant about "the Italian problem."
Generalizations can be valid or invalid depending on what they are. Anti-Semitic generalizations are mere racism. You really should move on.
When did this first start happening?
I used to be very active here, but I just needed to put my energy and time elsewhere for a little while, but before we were always able to rightly criticize anyone who deserves it. Which is how it should be...
Coincidentally as always some Jew typically is behind the bullshit. That isn't our fault lol we can only point out what we see with our own eyes...
I literally got a one day ban for criticizing this community and then another day ban for attempting to appeal it. This place has been compromised. And just the other day Catsfive makes a sticky post repeating the same exact concerns I got banned for saying.
And all Italians are Mafia, by this logic. It is your fault to use the crimes of a few to blame all. This is collectivism, and it is a major intellectual and moral fault.
Just replace a word: "Coincidentally as always some White Man is behind slavery. That isn't our fault lol we can only point out what we see with our own eyes."
Why create unnecessary resistance to a truth with your word choice though? Why not be more precise is your verbiage? I like calling them JINOs. It fosters conversation, reduces knee jerk reactions, and bypasses the “antisemitism” verbal gambit. “No. These guys only say they’re Jews to deflect criticism.” “No I’m not antisemitic. I have no problem with Jews. I have a problem with Satanists/Communists/Zionists/Etc, who only say they’re Jews to avoid criticism.”
Why dig in your heels in the name of your truth when you can be so much more persuasive with a minor course correction?
Chess, not checkers.
I'm not. You are projecting the sins of criminal Jews on innocent Jews.
Like I said, every case of slavery has a white man behind it. So, according to your logic, all white men are evil.
You anti-Semites are almost humorous. In one breath you say "everyone knows that jews are not collectively as a people furthering the global agenda." And then immediately afterward you say "the jewish people are revolutionaries...they were kicked out of...many Countries." Except those who were not furthering the global agenda? Or just...all of them? (Curiously, you seem to have no understanding of the phenomenon of the Unbelieving Jew and what that inclines them toward, but I will let that go.)
Only "fucking morons" think that my point was to argue that white men are slavers. It was to construct an exact analog to the anti-Semite argument that all Jews are global monsters, to reveal the logical fallacy involved. ("Some A are criminals. Therefore, all A are criminals.") Or, to make it again clear, "Everyone knows that all Italians are not collectively as a people furthering the Mafia." Yep, we do know it. And we don't rant about "the Italian problem."
Generalizations can be valid or invalid depending on what they are. Anti-Semitic generalizations are mere racism. You really should move on.