911 Where is the Plane wreckage?
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
The hole in the Pentagon for sure didn't look like it was hiding a plane inside (suspicious in addition to how hard it would be to hit it at such a flat angle).
And several people on-scene described what they saw in the immediate aftermath -- no airliner, and no suggestion that an airliner had ever been there.
For example:
https://www.twf.org/News/Y2005/0307-Pentagon.html
I've watched many videos supportive of the Pentagon being hit by a missile instead. Lets just call that "plausible" for the sake of argument.
The question then becomes: where /is/ the plane ? Did someone really manage to hijack a plane, fly it to an undisclosed location, murder everyone on board, dispose of their bodies without a trace, and then make the plane disappear even cleaner than MH370?
None of the pentagon videos address this.
"Hard" does not equal "impossible." As the facts have shown. How big a hole did you want? The one that happened was big enough for the fuselage.
Why are you correcting me even though I didn't go any farther than saying "hard" lol. I didn't say impossible, but it's pretty close to impossible right? The story is that the "terrorists" only had training on a single engine Cessna and then to guide a big ass commercial plane and hit the building head-on like they were going through a front door as opposed to hitting it from above...
I know I'm no expert on looking at pictures of buildings damaged by planes flying into them from the side at ground level but I do think it's weird that supposedly the whole plane just went into the building, including the wings, and then wasn't visible. I guess the reasoning would be that the building wreckage crumbled around it to obscure the plane wreckage but to answer your question and just being honest, no the hole doesn't look big enough to me. And (I could be wrong especially about this next part) I just always thought the wings should've pretty much gotten sliced off and left on the outside of the building.
Sorry if I was too hard. The prevalence of urban myth about certain topics irritates me and I don't carry it off well. The trouble is, even though something may be "hard," that doesn't mean it didn't happen. It is even harder for a missile guidance system to pull off that collision. Think about that.
Of course the plane went into the building. Where else was it going to go? The structural columns sliced it up, but the rest was propelled into the interior, being shredded as it went. Same thing with the wings, which may have been wrapped back alongside the body. And, yes, the building wreckage would have slumped into the cavity created by the airplane intrusion, probably covering up the airplane wreckage. If you would only think through the collision process, it will become less mysterious.
The plane wreckage was mingled with the building wreckage. The victim identification process would not have been for the weak of stomach.
Heh yeah, if that's what happened then I imagine the victim identification would be the way Norm Macdonald so eloquently described plane crash victim identification to be like: "everyone is just 'stuff' at that point: yeah we got some stuff over here, throw some of that stuff into this bag and label it Johnson..." (paraphrasing, he said it way funnier).
LOVE IT!! The wallet was found OMG!! How in the hell did I believe this back then. I just didn't listen. Thanks for the video!! i will share it with all my normie denying "friends" that think I am a paranoid Conspiracy theorist. IF they watch it. Most of my "friends" are too scared to watch anything I post of FB because they think their computer is going to blow up or something. KEK!
Someone may have the link to the comprehensive breakdown video of how it was all done that was uploaded on you tube around 2010
Yeah, and they faked all the home videos and eyewitness accounts as well. Give me a break.
it's really just fortunate that all of the "evil doers" passports fell safely from the planes to the ground outside the towers, because man does it suck having to get a new passport with the specialized photo and all
Where are the home videos? I would like to see. Have you seen the video?
Don't believe your lying eyes is my take on it. Google "whale in gym" or "hologram fashion show"....you think the Pentagon isn't far greater advanced in this technology?....what other excuse is there for no airplane debris? Google airplane crashes on the ground....see all the parts and debris....there was none in the Pennsylvania photos...google it....none....just a hole in the ground...impossible that the debris would have disintegrated into thin air. Problem is, no one wants to think about what would have happened to the passengers who boarded those planes and the ability to think critically caves...and normalcy bias kicks in, it's safer not to have to think 'we' are capable of such things.
The Pennsylvania crash produced a large hole into which the plane had plowed. There was wreckage and debris. It was buried in a memorial. It is remarkable how much a plane will disintegrate upon a hard crash. The establishment of a memorial is wholly at odds with your presumption that someone wanted this to be a non-memory.
I saw no 'wreckage' in the PA 'hole' in any photograph that was taken. Look again. Plane wreckage, by law, is collected and reconstructed. There was nothing to collect or reconstruct....from ANY of the crash sites! That's an impossibility....especially from PA and the Pentagon. There are innumerable 9/11 'memorials'. I can't even stomach watching or listening to anything said by our government "in memory" of the people they killed. IMO it was a false flag event where MANY were killed and others were blamed...THAT is the memory they want kept alive.
They got wreckage and pieces from the Twin Towers. They got wreckage and pieces from the Pentagon. They even got wreckage from Pennsylvania, but it is now buried. (It looks like Flight 93 may have gone to ground at a steep angle, mostly burying itself.) Reconstruction is normally pursued in order to deduce what caused an accident. Since there was nothing accidental about any of these collisions, and the pieces had been so thoroughly torn up, there wouldn't have been much point in attempting a reconstruction.
There is only one Pennsylvania memorial and it does display artifacts remaining from the passengers and fragments of the airplane.
You have a LOT to prove, with evidence, that the government was responsible. That may even be true, but just having an opinion is pretty worthless.
Well, believe it or not, I'm sticking by my "worthless" opinion. I've watched and listened to plenty of videos by experts and professionals to question the 'official' story and, as scary as where that conclusion takes me, I can no longer be convinced actual planes were involved.
That "large hole" supposedly produced by Flight 93 pre-existed the crash. Quite the "coincidence", wouldn't you say, for a plane to fall out of the sky into a pre-existing crater? lol
And who says it pre-existed? A conspiracy enthusiast?
There is a video where some guy tracks down the owners of the significant private video footage and finds that the significant home videos just happened to come from people in the photography/video business, many of whom have suspicious backgrounds.