From the NYPost article: "To be clear, public health officials were not wrong for making recommendations based on what was known at the time. That’s understandable. You go with the data you have."
Well, those are weasel words if I've ever seen them, and I would expect better from the NY Post. They seem to be willfully ignoring copious evidence that "public health officials" were pursuing a very destructive, very evil agenda that had NOTHING to do with public health.... rather, it all had to do with money, profits, and authoritarianism. Public health be damned, these Nazis were enjoying a new sense of power, gilded with lucrative profits, and a toady MSM telling them daily what HEROES they were!
And many directors and "officials" knew it regardless of their denials.
They are absolute liars and should be punished with crimes against humanity.
I know it. You know it. And soon, everyone will know it. As more people "died suddenly" people will awake like popcorn. These bastards won't be able to walk down the street.
At some point the data were available and many of them have been provided with the copy and filmed. They kept doing the same, blocking cures and pushing their agenda. No excuse.
That won't stop it. In fact, I think it makes it worse. Again, this is another Emily Oster Atlantic sorry-not-sorry article. Do. Not. Let. Them. Off. The. Hook.
True, you do go with the data you have. And the data they had, at BEST, meant they should have said:
"We aren't sure, but here's what we THINK"
The thing is, you can be wrong, especially if the data is wrong. So, if you pound your fist and scream that you're right, you'd better be right. If you're proven wrong, you're the asshole.
From the NYPost article: "To be clear, public health officials were not wrong for making recommendations based on what was known at the time. That’s understandable. You go with the data you have."
Well, those are weasel words if I've ever seen them, and I would expect better from the NY Post. They seem to be willfully ignoring copious evidence that "public health officials" were pursuing a very destructive, very evil agenda that had NOTHING to do with public health.... rather, it all had to do with money, profits, and authoritarianism. Public health be damned, these Nazis were enjoying a new sense of power, gilded with lucrative profits, and a toady MSM telling them daily what HEROES they were!
Yea, no amnesty for them, they don't get to hid behind incompetence anymore.
There never was any data.
It was a made-up bullshit story from the jump.
And many directors and "officials" knew it regardless of their denials.
They are absolute liars and should be punished with crimes against humanity.
I know it. You know it. And soon, everyone will know it. As more people "died suddenly" people will awake like popcorn. These bastards won't be able to walk down the street.
At some point the data were available and many of them have been provided with the copy and filmed. They kept doing the same, blocking cures and pushing their agenda. No excuse.
"Well, those are weasel words if I've ever seen them, and I would expect better from the NY Post. "
True. They may be acting on the advice of their legal teams, to avoid lawsuits.
Could be... still though.... weasel words.
That won't stop it. In fact, I think it makes it worse. Again, this is another Emily Oster Atlantic sorry-not-sorry article. Do. Not. Let. Them. Off. The. Hook.
True, you do go with the data you have. And the data they had, at BEST, meant they should have said:
"We aren't sure, but here's what we THINK"
The thing is, you can be wrong, especially if the data is wrong. So, if you pound your fist and scream that you're right, you'd better be right. If you're proven wrong, you're the asshole.
They didn't recommend anything. They threatened, shamed, locked up, etc, but they did NOT recommend.