Tracy Beanz blowing holes in John thaler's testimony
(twitter.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Now Tracy Beanz is prematurely casting doubt on J. Thuler. She says, "In a previous court filing against his ex wife, Thaler included a listing of bankruptcy’s he alleged were forged by Brittany Thaler. I’ve researched about 10 of these using access to federal bankruptcy cases and they are filed by real people, with real identities, and real debts. I will continue to do my due diligence on this - a lot of reading and a lot of litigation."
To me this ambiguous. And its awful to discredit the entire work of J. Thuler with an ambiguous finding as this. How do we know Beanz is privy to any of the documents J. Thuler has? I'm not saying one way or another. I'm saying it's way too early to start casting arrows.
Tracy is being naïve.
I agree. Usually Tracy Beans is a very good investigator, but she doesn't understand the complexity these operations will go to, to launder money, payoff politicians, threaten persons or destroy someone's good name.
Sounds like she needs to re-watch the video and hear again just exactly how deep the corruption went with multiple fake notary names and signatures, fake Title Companies, fake Mortgage companies, fake recordings of Deeds of Trusts, fake college degrees, fake law licenses, etc., all by hacking the university records and the County's Recorded Docs.
The honey pot Mexican Cartel woman who enticed attorney Thaler into marrying her so she could keep a close eye on his investigations, and the honeypot's mother were behind a great deal of this. When attorney Thaler learned that his own wife and her mother were involved, the honeypot wife fled with their young son and went all out to get attorney Thaler after he legally tried to have her return his son to him. Instead, there were attempts at injuring or forcing accidents on him by sabotaging his vehicles, and a sudden flurry of documents that were false but injurious to his name and reputation were then found in the County's records.
That's the thing I am noticing here with Sundance over at CTH, Brian Cates, and now Tracy Beanz. They all assume because J. Thuler started all of this from a child custody battle, the documents are all hearsay and baloney. I'll tell you this, when it comes to child custody and trying to get your kid back you'll find some of the greatest mind-blowing research done. I mean its detective work with a personal mission. So yes, J. Thuler could have very easily discovered a paper trail and all the things you mentioned above and more. Once a rabbit hole like this is discovered, it's a eureka moment. The motive to follow it completely through makes a complete case. This is what lawyers do. They have to answer all the questions. Also consider J. Thuler has been legally targeted and arrested over this custodial issue. When the judge is acting very peculiar in your case and showing obvious bias, it in itself becomes a motive to understand the judge's behavior (and motive) so that your name will be cleared.
I have seen some of the most extraordinary cases of research come from child custody battles. J. Thuler's research and discoveries doesn't surprise me when it comes to his motivation and resolve. If Thuler's documents are validated by vetted attorney's like Dr. David Clements, who was a former New Mexico prosecutor & law professor, he might be a good choice. Other organizations may be True the Vote, 100% Fed Up, et. al would be very helpful. Right now, the enemy is attempting to bury this story. The AZ Senate has the documents. Now, it's time to get the right people to verify it all. And move this ahead.
They are also implicitly taking the woman's side of things. Makes me think Sundance is a woman. Part of Thuler's story is that they accused him of being abusive and he was cleared by various authorities.
Did you know that a study found that some 66% of domestic abuse allegations by the estranged wife were false? That's a terrible burden put on fathers in a tribunal (it is not a jury trial), which means essential guilt until proving yourself innocent. This is a very steep incline to overcome indeed. Through the years I have a shit load of information on this.
We all know that a lot of hurtful things are said during divorce and custody proceedings, and I think that causes a reflexive skepticism. The timing doesn't seem to work out here, though. But both these critics jumped on the man immediately. It's the social norm now. Not always in the past. I've seen enough heartless moms to at least be ready to listen to him.
I'm assuming she got them the same way he did, publicly through county clerk's websites
Tracy Beanz has been sooo wrong before. I don't trust her.
That's why I stopped listening to her.
Slowly we will learn that almost every single "patriot influencer" out there was part of a controlled opposition. I think this part of the Plan us slowly weeding them out as well.
Her, or someone who works for her also dumped on the Brunson’s. Even if she’s right, wouldn’t her time be better spent uncovering some corruption in DC?
Called Beanz for a reason. Talking out her ass.
Maybe that's the point of this exercise. Flex those independent journalism muscles. Who knows? It does seem quite detailed on the surface. I certainly believe they,(John T) are on to something.
Soooooo diversion?