Just a reminder that it was ALL FAKE...!!!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (99)
sorted by:
The virus can be real, but everything about the pandemic nature of it fake.
The virus does cause effects that can lead to death, but the virus itself was…
None of that means there wasn’t a virus, and that the virus didn’t have symptoms that could and did lead to death on its own, but the numbers would have likely been a very bad flu year’s equivalent if not for the rest of the points above. Not pandemic and lockdown worthy.
And remember, even if it was that deadly, it was created intentionally, and then was intentionally allowed and encouraged to kill by using deadly treatment options.
IF it were created in a lab and intentionally released, then it was THE worst "bioweapon" of all time.
It was crafted with it's main purpose allowing mass mail in ballots so they could cheat easier in 2020 election. It wasn't supposed to kill everyone.
mmhmm
So China...created a virus that killed millions around the entire globe in order to fake the 2020 US election? I don't see how that adds up.
Not really China, but a lab in China funded by the US. When gain of function research was outlawed in the US, Fauci got the Obama administration to have the NIH send money to Wuhan. There are more labs in Ukraine, which may be the point of Russia going in.
Also, the "virus" didn't kill millions. The flu kills millions every year. The flu seems to have disappeared from stats in 2021 and 2022.
Correct.
It was also one of the best psyop weapons of all time. Which in my mind was always its purpose.
AND the vaccines were real...causing death and destruction...
viruses are fake and gay. germ theory is a hoax
If the goal was to cause death, why would they intentionally inflate the fatality rate? Wouldn't the better move be to downplay it as not a big deal to increase likelihood of exposure?
TLDR version: control was more important than deaths, especially long term.
Long version:
I don’t think death was the primary goal. I think, globally speaking, the primary goal was control, and domestically speaking (in the US) to get rid of DJT.
What kind of control did they seek? Well, first I’ll define “they” as “the globalists at WEF, WEF-aligned allies, and all of their embedded forces within each country, including politicians like Obama and Biden, and peons underneath them like BLM (the organization)”.
With that definition in place, I don’t think it’s controversial to say they have clear goals of a global financial system, social credit system, and larger society over which they can easily control the behaviors of the people, to maintain their power and wealth, without pesky things like freedom or equal opportunity getting in the way.
More specifically, they want global currency, no property ownership, no weapons, and full scale censorship of information. We know this because they say it openly.
So, control is the goal, getting rid of people not in their control (DJT) is a priority, but how? How do you make people accepting of it?
You need the fear of death, more so than actual deaths. But you still need actual deaths, or the fear doesn’t take hold.
Moreover, they need to divide and conquer. This is a strategy successfully deployed in places like China and Germany - get your fellow citizens to turn each other in for “bad behavior” and you’ve amplified your forces for free.
So the lockdown wasn’t about stopping deaths, it was about preventing communication, instilling fear and isolation and division that would allow them to introduce things like mandatory vaccinations and censorship of “misinformation”.
If they just let everyone spread the disease and hoped for deaths that way, then yes more people would end up in the hospital, more people would die, somewhat. Probably not enough to make up the difference in inflated numbers, but closer.
They’d gain some control specifically in health care.
But they’d still be missing key ingredients of what we went through - willful censorship (“stop the spread of harmful misinformation”), division among the people (“you’re killing grandma by going shopping or not wearing a mask”).
Whole entire precedents like dictating who could go where, and when (as needed for concepts like the 15 minute cities) would not have been established the way they were with the pandemic.
My two cents at least.
Yep can't have people talking in person instead of through electronic channels that big tech and censor and manipulate.