There is a reason why he had a faked BC. It was either he WAS born in Kenya (notice the date on the passport is 1959) or he was born in Hawaii BEFORE it was a state. Hawaii was made a state in 1959. (Did they make him younger than he really is? )
Either way he isn't a natural born citizen. It didn't matter if his mom was American or not. He had to be born on US soil.
Just to be clear, he had to be born on American soil to Americans for the presidency. Soil is not 'natural born' if your parents aren't citizens. Kamala violates this as well, because people don't care to comprehend the difference. You can't crawl over the border, drop a baby, and have it grow up to be President - you have to immigrate legally, become a citizen, then have your baby.
No you don't. Born in the US, you're a birthright citizen and can run for president.
"Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution directs that all persons born in the United States are U.S. citizens. This is the case regardless of the tax or immigration status of a person's parents."
No, it doesn't. You've put quotes around some flawed interpretation of it. It says "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." and subject to the jurisdiction thereof means that the parents must be Americans, not visiting foreigners (non-Americans (non-citizens), and the children they make, are under the jurisdiction of their home country, not this one).
When you're in the US, even as a tourist, even as an illegal crawling over the border to drop a baby on US soil, you are subject to the jurisdiction here.
The exception would be royals and diplomats and their children. Anyone who has diplomatic immunity.
Tourists and people on work visas and such don't have diplomatic immunity. So they are subject to the laws here.
Surely you don't think tourists can come over here and rape and kill and sell drugs and rip the tags off mattresses with no fear of the po-po, do you?
So yes, anchor babies can one day be President. Scary, huh? 🤷♀️
Yeah, you might want to go check on what you're claiming here.
Unless someone is here as a member of a royal family or a diplomat (or their spouse and kids and such) with diplomatic immunity, they are subject to the jurisdiction here.
Or do you think tourists have the right to run around the country breaking laws left and right?
I get that people don't like the idea of the very slim, teeny tiny, itsy bitsy chance that Harris might become President, but you don't get to keep adding conditions to the Constitution to stop that from happening.
As long as you're not the child of royals or diplomats or the like, if you're born in the US, you're a US citizen and can be President one day.
All this "Your parents and grandparents and your barber's second cousin's ex-husband has to have been born in the US for you to be a US citizen!!" shit is just asinine.
Seriously, where did this stuff come from? I never saw it before Harris became VP. Was it on a podcast or something? Or do you just see other people say it and you just repeat it?
The writers of the constitution would not allow anyone to illegally enter the country and then drop spawn who become citizens. Makes no sense especially when looking at the rest of the constitution and the bill of rights.
There is a process for becoming a citizen that any foreigners can work through.
Those foreigners are subject to the jurisdiction of their home nations. As is their offspring. Until thy go through the citizenship application and process.
Makes perfect sense both spirit and letter of the law.
The fact that politicians continually ‘interpret’ these very detailed and specific laws illegally shows that they are complicit in weakening the USA in so many ways.
31 CFR § 515.329 - Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; person subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
CFR
prev | next
§ 515.329 Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; person subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
The terms person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and person subject to U.S. jurisdiction include:
(a) Any individual, wherever located, who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
(b) Any person within the United States as defined in § 515.330;
(c) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States or of any State, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and
(d) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization, wherever organized or doing business, that is owned or controlled by persons specified in paragraphs (a) or (c) of this section.
[50 FR 27437, July 3, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 14145, Mar. 24, 2003; 80 FR 2292, Jan. 16, 2015; 81 FR 13991, Mar. 16, 2016]
There is a reason why he had a faked BC. It was either he WAS born in Kenya (notice the date on the passport is 1959) or he was born in Hawaii BEFORE it was a state. Hawaii was made a state in 1959. (Did they make him younger than he really is? )
Either way he isn't a natural born citizen. It didn't matter if his mom was American or not. He had to be born on US soil.
Just to be clear, he had to be born on American soil to Americans for the presidency. Soil is not 'natural born' if your parents aren't citizens. Kamala violates this as well, because people don't care to comprehend the difference. You can't crawl over the border, drop a baby, and have it grow up to be President - you have to immigrate legally, become a citizen, then have your baby.
No you don't. Born in the US, you're a birthright citizen and can run for president.
"Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution directs that all persons born in the United States are U.S. citizens. This is the case regardless of the tax or immigration status of a person's parents."
No, it doesn't. You've put quotes around some flawed interpretation of it. It says "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." and subject to the jurisdiction thereof means that the parents must be Americans, not visiting foreigners (non-Americans (non-citizens), and the children they make, are under the jurisdiction of their home country, not this one).
When you're in the US, even as a tourist, even as an illegal crawling over the border to drop a baby on US soil, you are subject to the jurisdiction here.
The exception would be royals and diplomats and their children. Anyone who has diplomatic immunity.
Tourists and people on work visas and such don't have diplomatic immunity. So they are subject to the laws here.
Surely you don't think tourists can come over here and rape and kill and sell drugs and rip the tags off mattresses with no fear of the po-po, do you?
So yes, anchor babies can one day be President. Scary, huh? 🤷♀️
‘Subject to jurisdiction of...’.
So many politicians are ignorant of these requirements and the media doesn’t want to change what they’ve been brainwashed into believing.
Yeah, you might want to go check on what you're claiming here.
Unless someone is here as a member of a royal family or a diplomat (or their spouse and kids and such) with diplomatic immunity, they are subject to the jurisdiction here.
Or do you think tourists have the right to run around the country breaking laws left and right?
I get that people don't like the idea of the very slim, teeny tiny, itsy bitsy chance that Harris might become President, but you don't get to keep adding conditions to the Constitution to stop that from happening.
As long as you're not the child of royals or diplomats or the like, if you're born in the US, you're a US citizen and can be President one day.
All this "Your parents and grandparents and your barber's second cousin's ex-husband has to have been born in the US for you to be a US citizen!!" shit is just asinine.
Seriously, where did this stuff come from? I never saw it before Harris became VP. Was it on a podcast or something? Or do you just see other people say it and you just repeat it?
Do some research on the amendment.
The writers of the constitution would not allow anyone to illegally enter the country and then drop spawn who become citizens. Makes no sense especially when looking at the rest of the constitution and the bill of rights.
There is a process for becoming a citizen that any foreigners can work through.
Those foreigners are subject to the jurisdiction of their home nations. As is their offspring. Until thy go through the citizenship application and process.
Makes perfect sense both spirit and letter of the law.
The fact that politicians continually ‘interpret’ these very detailed and specific laws illegally shows that they are complicit in weakening the USA in so many ways.
31 CFR § 515.329 - Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; person subject to U.S. jurisdiction. CFR prev | next § 515.329 Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; person subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The terms person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and person subject to U.S. jurisdiction include:
(a) Any individual, wherever located, who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
(b) Any person within the United States as defined in § 515.330;
(c) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States or of any State, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and
(d) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization, wherever organized or doing business, that is owned or controlled by persons specified in paragraphs (a) or (c) of this section.
[50 FR 27437, July 3, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 14145, Mar. 24, 2003; 80 FR 2292, Jan. 16, 2015; 81 FR 13991, Mar. 16, 2016]
According to the Supreme Court natural born just means soil