A group of House Democrats sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland urging the Biden administration to drop the charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is facing up to 175 years in prison for exposing US war crimes if extradited to the US and convicted.
The letter was led by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and also signed by Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), Cori Bush (D-MO), and Greg Casar (D-TX).
What reason would the Jihad Squad have for advocating for dropped charges?
How would this benefit them?
It's also interesting that Trump never advocated for his release, after using Wikileaks against Hillary.
If this is the case, bearing in mind the Left squad is now on his side, could the whole Wikileaks operation thing have been put into place specifically TO destroy the US, with nobody realising they had Trump in the wings ready to save the country?
Or, could it simply be that they're trying to introduce some precedent for not convicting "enemies of the state" under US Law, with Assange himself being a non-factor? Let's assume he'll never actually be extradited to the US, considering the political trial hotbed state the nation is in, okay. Then are the Squad merely trying to use his name in a tactical move, so that when prosecution comes for their heads, they can use the Assange case as some kind of precedent for why they shouldn't be prosecuted?
Sometimes the right answer is just the simplest. That group is a theater troupe. They're not serious legislators or leaders. They don't set their own agendas or actually represent their own constituents. They merely mime that they have their own agenda and mime that they represent their constituents.
In regards to Julian Assange, there is no agenda that justifies keeping a political prisoner that committed no crimes locked up like he's Hannibal fucking Lector.
Either they are pandering to their audience to show empty support for Assange knowing he wont be released. OR they know he will be released and want to create the appearance that the regime supported his release all along.
Assange broke no laws, Assange published information -- about everyone -- that was provided. He was a valuable source of information that also did his best to hold information back just long enough to not endanger lives, which of course was more than Snowden and the tranny did.
He is unjustly held prisoner -- period -- and that goes for the Trump admin, the Biden admin or any other admin.
It is a miscarriage of justice that he does not walk free, and theater groups who advocate for his release in small numbers just see how the winds blow.
You are correct that they don't set their own agendas...they are puppets, which means the puppet masters are actually the ones who want the charges dropped. Now, why?
I want to point out that Giuliani met with Assange to negotiate a Trump pardon for him but came back empty. So Trump did try to pardon him. I am assuming their must be something Assange knows that the white hats need to be kept secret in order for the plan to work, or something.
As for the dipshit 4 +3, I suppose they could want him released for that very reason but I kind of doubt that they would know. Otherwise, it must be for appearances or one of those other reasons as someone said below
Well. in the sense that, they are too young for Assange to know any of their bad deeds, yes. In fact, this could also be seen as an attack from the DNC new guard to the old guard since they know they can't afford Assange to speak but the public would like him free.
A group of House Democrats sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland urging the Biden administration to drop the charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is facing up to 175 years in prison for exposing US war crimes if extradited to the US and convicted.
The letter was led by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and also signed by Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), Cori Bush (D-MO), and Greg Casar (D-TX).
What reason would the Jihad Squad have for advocating for dropped charges?
How would this benefit them?
It's also interesting that Trump never advocated for his release, after using Wikileaks against Hillary.
If this is the case, bearing in mind the Left squad is now on his side, could the whole Wikileaks operation thing have been put into place specifically TO destroy the US, with nobody realising they had Trump in the wings ready to save the country?
Or, could it simply be that they're trying to introduce some precedent for not convicting "enemies of the state" under US Law, with Assange himself being a non-factor? Let's assume he'll never actually be extradited to the US, considering the political trial hotbed state the nation is in, okay. Then are the Squad merely trying to use his name in a tactical move, so that when prosecution comes for their heads, they can use the Assange case as some kind of precedent for why they shouldn't be prosecuted?
Sometimes the right answer is just the simplest. That group is a theater troupe. They're not serious legislators or leaders. They don't set their own agendas or actually represent their own constituents. They merely mime that they have their own agenda and mime that they represent their constituents.
In regards to Julian Assange, there is no agenda that justifies keeping a political prisoner that committed no crimes locked up like he's Hannibal fucking Lector.
Either they are pandering to their audience to show empty support for Assange knowing he wont be released. OR they know he will be released and want to create the appearance that the regime supported his release all along.
This is the correct take.
Assange broke no laws, Assange published information -- about everyone -- that was provided. He was a valuable source of information that also did his best to hold information back just long enough to not endanger lives, which of course was more than Snowden and the tranny did.
He is unjustly held prisoner -- period -- and that goes for the Trump admin, the Biden admin or any other admin.
It is a miscarriage of justice that he does not walk free, and theater groups who advocate for his release in small numbers just see how the winds blow.
Virtue signalers gonna virtue signal.
You are correct that they don't set their own agendas...they are puppets, which means the puppet masters are actually the ones who want the charges dropped. Now, why?
THIS 👆
They think by saving his neck they will save theirs when charges are brought against them or they are under WH control. All will be revealed...
I think you hit the nail on the head! Those evil witches cannot be worried about Assange. They must be worried about their own necks.
I want to point out that Giuliani met with Assange to negotiate a Trump pardon for him but came back empty. So Trump did try to pardon him. I am assuming their must be something Assange knows that the white hats need to be kept secret in order for the plan to work, or something.
As for the dipshit 4 +3, I suppose they could want him released for that very reason but I kind of doubt that they would know. Otherwise, it must be for appearances or one of those other reasons as someone said below
They’re in cohorts with us if you look hard enough.
Well. in the sense that, they are too young for Assange to know any of their bad deeds, yes. In fact, this could also be seen as an attack from the DNC new guard to the old guard since they know they can't afford Assange to speak but the public would like him free.