I agree on the pharma ads. And notice that almost all of them have death as a possible side effect. One annoying item is don't take if you are allergic to it. Duh!
Came here for this. I like to think he outgrew his childishness but as a freedom loving American, he's forever on my blacklist with his emotional kneejerk bs of "jail" anyone that disagrees with me! That's tyrant in the making statements right there
totally agree hes got some good things going for him dont get me wrong, " BUT " he also wants to lock up climate deniers of which im one,and hes also hardcore pro vaccine,.those two things alone does it for me,.also he needs to have good security,cause remember his uncle JFK,.wanted to get rid of the Fed,.sadly we all know how that turned out,.!.
Now, making mental health records public is a bad idea. How many people are currently NOT going to get mental help because doing so would put you on a list and potentially make it so you can't get a gun or would trigger red flag laws?
RFKJ is possibly a trojan horse, to trick patriotic anti-vaxxer democrats into thinking he is a good deal.
RFKJ is NOT a viable candidate for any patriot of any kind.
RFK Jr has made several tweets over the last few days inferring he will NOT prosecute Fauci, et al
Calling it a "quagmire of retribution" and that we should "move on" to ensure this never happens again.
.... Kinda sounds like when Gregg and Catherine promised to release TERABYTES of cell phone data, video footage, and promised a coalition of THOUSANDS of Sheriffs to begin making arrests ...
And then just told us to "move on" from 2020 upon date of promised delivery -- and further distracting us with the Konnech bait & switch.
RFK Jr has spent the last few years building up his credit calling Fauci and the likes CRIMINAL MURDERERS.
But now he's on Twitter telling us we should move on? And that accountability is "revenge and retribution" !?!?
I'm sorry guys. RFK Jr is controlled oppo.
It's the same pattern with these controlled oppo people over and over again.
Trump followed up with his promise. Which wasn't directly to "lock her up".
The promised deliverable was "to have someone look into your (Killary's) situation" ...
Which as far as I know is still an ongoing promise on several fronts.
Gregg and Catherine have made SEVERAL promised concerte deliverables they have utterly failed to meet, often denying they even made them.
And RFK Jr hasn't made a concrete promised deliverable that's relevant to this conversation other than "fix corruption" which isn't that concrete and if he doesn't investigate Fauci et al -- won't work.
As far as I'm concerned your comparison isn't really related or relevant/
I'm not calling Trump controlled opposition either it's just not really relevant YET as his promised deliverable is ongoing (Durham amoung others still working).
It may become relevant if we discover Trump never even intended to eve. TRY and seriously prosecute Hillary. But at least at time of writing that's utterly ridiculous and there's a mountain of evidence suggesting his intent is legitimate.
Unfortunately I can't say that about the other characters we're discussing. I could go into further details about this including what exactly has been promised and the histories of the individuals we're talking about
-- but it's a little outside the scope of this comment which is just to say despite the similar emotions in your comparison (not getting outcomes we want on our timeline) I don't really think it's relevant other than in this emotional sort of way.
Fair enough. I actually think it is relevant in the sense that the standards we are judging the other side by are the same standards we use on ourselves/our side and vice versa. Too often Trump worship seems to take over and a blind eye is turned. We cannot do this.
This came out in your response - the even handedness.
FWIW, I was totally expecting Trump to publicly start pursuing Hillary once he took office. Instead, IIRC, he stated that he would not for the good of the country. This would have been very early on, maybe even after he won but before his inauguration. And no, I did not save the link. 😔
I agree on the pharma ads. And notice that almost all of them have death as a possible side effect. One annoying item is don't take if you are allergic to it. Duh!
how does one know if they are allergic to it if they have never had it before?
Yeah, that one puzzles me. I support his fight against big pharma but that's as far as I'll go.
Came here for this. I like to think he outgrew his childishness but as a freedom loving American, he's forever on my blacklist with his emotional kneejerk bs of "jail" anyone that disagrees with me! That's tyrant in the making statements right there
Perhaps he has that stance simply because it further ingratiates him to the Left and allows him to continue red-pilling them in other areas.
Just a theory but wanted to toss it out there.
totally agree hes got some good things going for him dont get me wrong, " BUT " he also wants to lock up climate deniers of which im one,and hes also hardcore pro vaccine,.those two things alone does it for me,.also he needs to have good security,cause remember his uncle JFK,.wanted to get rid of the Fed,.sadly we all know how that turned out,.!.
He's got my vote for primary.
I just said to my wife last night they should ban all pharma ads on TV, same as cigarettes and cannabis ads are already banned
We are one of the few countries that allow then to air, most do not.
All meds sides effects are poisons that end up killing you including animals. That’s all I can say.
Without the big Pharma ads or big business (mcDonalds etc) ads there probably wouldn’t be as many ads bc no else can afford them.
he's primarying Bidan. That is a good thing.
But he would be Bidan minus Pfizer, that is all.
RFKJ is anti gun and pro environazi.
Now, making mental health records public is a bad idea. How many people are currently NOT going to get mental help because doing so would put you on a list and potentially make it so you can't get a gun or would trigger red flag laws?
RFKJ is possibly a trojan horse, to trick patriotic anti-vaxxer democrats into thinking he is a good deal.
RFKJ is NOT a viable candidate for any patriot of any kind.
They should eliminate all medical patents. Sure we need to encourage innovation, but there are much better ways.
RFK Jr has made several tweets over the last few days inferring he will NOT prosecute Fauci, et al
Calling it a "quagmire of retribution" and that we should "move on" to ensure this never happens again.
.... Kinda sounds like when Gregg and Catherine promised to release TERABYTES of cell phone data, video footage, and promised a coalition of THOUSANDS of Sheriffs to begin making arrests ...
And then just told us to "move on" from 2020 upon date of promised delivery -- and further distracting us with the Konnech bait & switch.
RFK Jr has spent the last few years building up his credit calling Fauci and the likes CRIMINAL MURDERERS.
But now he's on Twitter telling us we should move on? And that accountability is "revenge and retribution" !?!?
I'm sorry guys. RFK Jr is controlled oppo.
It's the same pattern with these controlled oppo people over and over again.
1 Build street cred
2 Gain leadership of movement
3 Bait and Switch the delivery
RFK Jr is between step 2 - 3.
That's exactly how I felt when Trump failed to "Lock her up!" But I'm not going to start calling him controlled opposition over it.
Trump followed up with his promise. Which wasn't directly to "lock her up".
The promised deliverable was "to have someone look into your (Killary's) situation" ...
Which as far as I know is still an ongoing promise on several fronts.
Gregg and Catherine have made SEVERAL promised concerte deliverables they have utterly failed to meet, often denying they even made them.
And RFK Jr hasn't made a concrete promised deliverable that's relevant to this conversation other than "fix corruption" which isn't that concrete and if he doesn't investigate Fauci et al -- won't work.
As far as I'm concerned your comparison isn't really related or relevant/
I'm not calling Trump controlled opposition either it's just not really relevant YET as his promised deliverable is ongoing (Durham amoung others still working).
It may become relevant if we discover Trump never even intended to eve. TRY and seriously prosecute Hillary. But at least at time of writing that's utterly ridiculous and there's a mountain of evidence suggesting his intent is legitimate.
Unfortunately I can't say that about the other characters we're discussing. I could go into further details about this including what exactly has been promised and the histories of the individuals we're talking about
Promises made. Promises kept.
Fair enough. I actually think it is relevant in the sense that the standards we are judging the other side by are the same standards we use on ourselves/our side and vice versa. Too often Trump worship seems to take over and a blind eye is turned. We cannot do this.
This came out in your response - the even handedness.
FWIW, I was totally expecting Trump to publicly start pursuing Hillary once he took office. Instead, IIRC, he stated that he would not for the good of the country. This would have been very early on, maybe even after he won but before his inauguration. And no, I did not save the link. 😔
100% agree and no need for a link I remember Trump saying this as well
Lol I don't know why it formatted like that 🤦♂️