Why should they? For decades all I have heard is women's liberation! Break that glass ceiling! Men are just trying to keep women down. They get better job positions and pay.....yada yada yada. Insert violin music here....
This is why I'm of two minds about it. Tired of defending women who won't defend themselves and their own spaces plus the troons can pick on the libtard women as much as they like. Only traditional women who have some fight in them deserve the back up.
The tranny movement is really about getting to the kids women will be collateral damage. I will be there to defend the women in my world. They want us to get violent so they will target the kids with the mentally ill
The deal is that the trannies attacking women is designed to cause chaos and disillusion. Ideally it will spark a war between the sexes, like the women's rights movement did earlier last century. Women now arguably have more rights than men - for example, they have more college degrees, the only thing that can be argued is equal pay in a lifetime, but that is because women DO have to take time out for child bearing.
The leftie cult/ideology/religion delights at causing chaos and even wide-spread death, as we have witnessed in the last three years re: Covid measures. Those satanic individuals are salivating at the idea of a tranny actually killing a woman.
There are women protesting this thing, and amazingly, the media is blasting them as transphobic. Same playbook.
Oh, and the answer is: get a proper boyfriend and/or husband. Traditionally, they ARE the knights in shining armor. This is the way it was designed to be, as women are vulnerable when they are heavily pregnant and carrying a babe in arms. The instinct to protect mothers carries on for a lifetime when the pair is bonded. It is not sexist, it just is.
Also, feminism can be tempered to recognize male/female bonding too. For example, a strong woman can emotionally support a man's efforts to get a better job through education, even if she is looking after toddlers. This is topical today, as many men give up on education and/or vocational training prematurely, because the system is absurdly geared towards women.
Relationships are not just about sex, as the radicals, and Hollywood, tried to make out.
Yep to any ungrateful woman who says "chivalry is dead" just for not holding a door for her point out that 1) Chivalry is mostly a code of combat and 2) the parts pertaining to women carried the price of the woman being obedient to her man.
It's hard to hold doors for women - one has to judge beforehand if the participant will get offended by it - usually the ones wearing normal make-up, or none at all, with natural colored hair, appreciate it. But the spiteful mutants, with noserings will start yelling at one.
The feminists took particular exception to the obedience part. They painted it as women are expected to be barefoot and pregnant, in the kitchen.
It is my hypothesis that the language has changed. I believe that a woman has to manage the man in a relationship. This includes giving them enough responsibility to gain respect for themselves. The traditional Obedience is not a slavery situation, in my opinion. It is more like unconditional love and support - which women happen to be very good at.
Wow, this thread is full of glowie soyboy types whining about feminism.
Anyway, the real men will always protect the real women -- but you can't expect to always have a real man around. Learn to protect yourself and -- lock and load.
Trannies are perverts and will go after whatever they can get in my opinion--weak women and kids mostly.
Feminism is ubiquitous, even in the church, and very sad. My oldest daughter, 19 is somewhat awake, but also so immature in so many ways, thinks it's stupid for guys to be chivalrous and hold/open doors. She will not take advice so I sit back and pray. She prides herself on not showing pain, being tough, but can be girly. She s a hard worker, independent, cowgirl. I worry she will choose some lazy boy because he likes to hunt and fish like she does, not a hard working, God fearing/loving, wise young man. (Because that's who she hangs out with--good kids, not into bad things just lazy with zero ambition in life) and sadly hubby is fine with that and won't speak into her life about the dangers ahead.
Why should they? For decades all I have heard is women's liberation! Break that glass ceiling! Men are just trying to keep women down. They get better job positions and pay.....yada yada yada. Insert violin music here....
This is why I'm of two minds about it. Tired of defending women who won't defend themselves and their own spaces plus the troons can pick on the libtard women as much as they like. Only traditional women who have some fight in them deserve the back up.
I’ll gladly step up but shit like that won’t happen the places I go
The Transgender movement is Misogynistic at its core.
My husband of 46 years would tell you he will stomp on the bits I leave.
The tranny movement is really about getting to the kids women will be collateral damage. I will be there to defend the women in my world. They want us to get violent so they will target the kids with the mentally ill
Depends. Is the woman some blue haired Karen or My lovely wife and why are they being threatened?
Of course, LQdy!🤗💐🔥
The deal is that the trannies attacking women is designed to cause chaos and disillusion. Ideally it will spark a war between the sexes, like the women's rights movement did earlier last century. Women now arguably have more rights than men - for example, they have more college degrees, the only thing that can be argued is equal pay in a lifetime, but that is because women DO have to take time out for child bearing.
The leftie cult/ideology/religion delights at causing chaos and even wide-spread death, as we have witnessed in the last three years re: Covid measures. Those satanic individuals are salivating at the idea of a tranny actually killing a woman.
There are women protesting this thing, and amazingly, the media is blasting them as transphobic. Same playbook.
Oh, and the answer is: get a proper boyfriend and/or husband. Traditionally, they ARE the knights in shining armor. This is the way it was designed to be, as women are vulnerable when they are heavily pregnant and carrying a babe in arms. The instinct to protect mothers carries on for a lifetime when the pair is bonded. It is not sexist, it just is.
Also, feminism can be tempered to recognize male/female bonding too. For example, a strong woman can emotionally support a man's efforts to get a better job through education, even if she is looking after toddlers. This is topical today, as many men give up on education and/or vocational training prematurely, because the system is absurdly geared towards women.
Relationships are not just about sex, as the radicals, and Hollywood, tried to make out.
Yep to any ungrateful woman who says "chivalry is dead" just for not holding a door for her point out that 1) Chivalry is mostly a code of combat and 2) the parts pertaining to women carried the price of the woman being obedient to her man.
It's hard to hold doors for women - one has to judge beforehand if the participant will get offended by it - usually the ones wearing normal make-up, or none at all, with natural colored hair, appreciate it. But the spiteful mutants, with noserings will start yelling at one.
The feminists took particular exception to the obedience part. They painted it as women are expected to be barefoot and pregnant, in the kitchen.
It is my hypothesis that the language has changed. I believe that a woman has to manage the man in a relationship. This includes giving them enough responsibility to gain respect for themselves. The traditional Obedience is not a slavery situation, in my opinion. It is more like unconditional love and support - which women happen to be very good at.
These days, some men prefer to be your camp follower in shining sequins.
Count on it if you are in Texas
Wow, this thread is full of glowie soyboy types whining about feminism.
Anyway, the real men will always protect the real women -- but you can't expect to always have a real man around. Learn to protect yourself and -- lock and load.
Trannies are perverts and will go after whatever they can get in my opinion--weak women and kids mostly.
Feminism is ubiquitous, even in the church, and very sad. My oldest daughter, 19 is somewhat awake, but also so immature in so many ways, thinks it's stupid for guys to be chivalrous and hold/open doors. She will not take advice so I sit back and pray. She prides herself on not showing pain, being tough, but can be girly. She s a hard worker, independent, cowgirl. I worry she will choose some lazy boy because he likes to hunt and fish like she does, not a hard working, God fearing/loving, wise young man. (Because that's who she hangs out with--good kids, not into bad things just lazy with zero ambition in life) and sadly hubby is fine with that and won't speak into her life about the dangers ahead.
I'll defend my women, the rest are on their own... welcome to feminism... you get what you wanted...
maybe stop expecting chivalry after feminism killed it. intersectionality created this mess too imo.
Mine too.
Bitches always have each other and act catty.