It's not just cars. The faulty MCAS software in the 737 MAX killed 346 people in two crashes, by overriding the pilots' desperate attempts to pull the nose up.
Ann Heshe (spelling?) was murdered when her car was remote controlled ito a home, before her documentary films about child trafficking and another about chemtrails were released.
They said she was dead, burned alive, seconds before she tried to climb out of the body bag on a gurney on live TV
Anybody see those movies?
I heard that the Indian programmers were hired after Boeing laid off a bunch of senior software engineers. The ones who had the historical knowledge who might have prevented the bad software.
I will say that I have seen the AH-64D/E Apache Ada software written by Boeing and dang, that was some well-written code. Someone at Mesa knows Ada and software design.
Mostly correct. The supposed sales objective was that the 737 MAX was supposed to be identical in handling with the 737 New Generation (NG), so as to preclude the necessity for special training. Just move over from one plane to the other. Why would MCAS training be needed, if they have the same handling? This is a case where the customers believed the vendor.
The engine mounting moved the C.G. slightly forward, but the real problem was when the plane started to mount an angle of attack, the sidewise area of the engine nacelles acted like forward aerodynamic surfaces, wanting to push the nose up. If left uncontrolled, this would result in a stall and loss of lift. The idea behind MCAS was that it would insert a nose-down pitch moment via the horizontal stabilizer. What they didn't reckon was that the application would occur again...and again...and again...cumulatively. Overriding the pilots' control inputs.
Bad Boeing oversight (as in...no oversight?) was the main culprit. Coders do exactly what you tell them to. They are not aerodynamicists and they have no insight into the correctness of the algorithms. I am not happy with programming outsourcing, but I think it is not fair to blame the coders. The problem was above their pay grade.
It's not just cars. The faulty MCAS software in the 737 MAX killed 346 people in two crashes, by overriding the pilots' desperate attempts to pull the nose up.
Uninterruptible autopilot … shuuush! We’re not supposed to know about these things.
Anyone of note die in those crashes?
Ann Heshe (spelling?) was murdered when her car was remote controlled ito a home, before her documentary films about child trafficking and another about chemtrails were released.
They said she was dead, burned alive, seconds before she tried to climb out of the body bag on a gurney on live TV Anybody see those movies?
Of course not
Thanks for that info.
I heard that the Indian programmers were hired after Boeing laid off a bunch of senior software engineers. The ones who had the historical knowledge who might have prevented the bad software.
I will say that I have seen the AH-64D/E Apache Ada software written by Boeing and dang, that was some well-written code. Someone at Mesa knows Ada and software design.
Mostly correct. The supposed sales objective was that the 737 MAX was supposed to be identical in handling with the 737 New Generation (NG), so as to preclude the necessity for special training. Just move over from one plane to the other. Why would MCAS training be needed, if they have the same handling? This is a case where the customers believed the vendor.
The engine mounting moved the C.G. slightly forward, but the real problem was when the plane started to mount an angle of attack, the sidewise area of the engine nacelles acted like forward aerodynamic surfaces, wanting to push the nose up. If left uncontrolled, this would result in a stall and loss of lift. The idea behind MCAS was that it would insert a nose-down pitch moment via the horizontal stabilizer. What they didn't reckon was that the application would occur again...and again...and again...cumulatively. Overriding the pilots' control inputs.
Bad Boeing oversight (as in...no oversight?) was the main culprit. Coders do exactly what you tell them to. They are not aerodynamicists and they have no insight into the correctness of the algorithms. I am not happy with programming outsourcing, but I think it is not fair to blame the coders. The problem was above their pay grade.
Yes. 346 of them. Each and every one with a headstone.
Each and everyone with someone who loved them.