I am not as versed on the Q posts as others are here. Did Q mention AI in any of the posts?
Writing this because AI is coming for a lot of jobs. Being in the Seattle area I know some tech people who work on AI and the stuff they tell me about has huge implications for society.
AI will (or at least will have the capability to) replace a large percentage of the work force especially jobs that have to do with analyzing data and statistics for example. With so many people potentially losing their jobs to AI is their a plan to help those people. AI has the potential to be the 3rd biggest revolution in history after the agricultural and industrial revolution.
Will large amounts of people losing their livelihoods to AI be a precipice? Or will AI to a capacity along with a new blockchain monetary and financial system be used to free humanity from the central bank tax slave system?
Would love to here your thoughts on this because these implications are fascinating to me as I have started to read more about AI.
Sure, AI has potential. But we still can't get Autocorrect to work right.
Here's the rub. AI has been being used for years.
Most of the bots you deal with run on AI.
Chat systems are 50% +- chat AI algorithms.
The AI you see now has been being developed for 20+ years.
But what do you think about OP's question?
My feeling is the premise is flawed. AI isn't new.
The idea that it needs to be challenged or circumvented isn't plausible.
Trying to stop progress has proven a poor strategy through all human achievements and their upheaval throughout history.
Embrace it is the best bet.
Accept that all banking, tech and service jobs will disappear in the future. Even law enforcement, lawyers and judges will become an automated system in an AI future. But in an AI future non violent laws will cease to exist. There will be AI safeguards to stop the act before it happens.
Learn to code is a short term strategy.
Learn to farm, build, or otherwise serve the machine is the best bet. Any task that requires inspiration or invention will be highly valued but the process of innovation will then be captured and made repeatable.
Ideas will no longer have value without real world application like art. Those highly paid strategists and consultants will be replaced by a machine learning engine.
It will be like the episode of Star Trek where the two planets religated their wars to computers and then casualties were shuffled into suicide machines to feed the beasts thirsts.
Seems pretty happy no?
Once we're allowed to think for ourselves we many not need ai.
AI will eventually force universal basic income (with CBDC’s as the payment method).
There really is no point of taxation if that occurs.
There were some references to we would be surprised who was talking to us.
At the time I wondered if that referenced AI, but dismissed it.
The Bible on the other hand states that in the end days there would be no work for man nor beast. That certainly matches up with your observations.
Q may have alluded to it. We're heading toward an unexplored era of humanity. It sounds positive.
u/#q2450
What is the difference between AI, and a Monte Carlo analysis? Multiple iterations, with tuning to a best fit curve. AI just helps maps the connections, data and possible outcomes. AI is a great tool and I think Q would need it to map all the possible outcomes and chose the best one.