Researchers are now trying to pussyfoot around what happened. They don't want to lose their funding so they are publishing "MILKTOAST" (sic) studies like this which provide cover to the FDA, NIH, CDC, and Pfizer.

The reality is that they all fucking knew the jab was useless and extremely harmful to us. That was the whole point of the fucking jab.

To harm us.

I don't know if thats the best study to go off of. The article links to the original study in raw form and its pretty clearly pro-vax...

Results: Among 51011 employees, 20689 (41%) had had a previous documented episode of COVID-19, and 42064 (83%) had received at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19 occurred in 2452 (5%) during the study. Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated state was independently associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, .70; 95% C.I., .61-.80), leading to an estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 30% (95% CI, 20-39%). Compared to last exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 90 days, last exposure 6-9 months previously was associated with twice the risk of COVID-19, and last exposure 9-12 months previously with 3.5 times the risk.

Conclusions: The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19, while the virus strains dominant in the community were those represented in the vaccine.

"The risk of COVID-19… varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19."

this is made to look like its from the study, but the study says nothing of the sort. wtf is this shite

Stunning...but not surprising.

But dollars, donuts and days off work were priceless

This looks to me like it says that each subsequent booster was less effective, not that there's more infections the more boosted you are?

Lmmfao