crimes against children. she gets the wall!!!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
The argument is that you sound like a deranged lunatic who simply wants revenge instead of justice.
Edit: God bless America and God bless the constitution... except for that part about cruel and unusual punishment, that part only applies when I want it to...
I want revenge on them…vicious, agonizing revenge. Yes?
Yes, you are no better than them in practice.
You could rightly claim to be better than them in the sense that you are punishing evil, and they are conducting it, but in practice you are doing the same shit they do to children all the while claiming them to be bad and yourself to be good. It's a joke.
Well, I think that I am better than them. I think that the innocence of children is the most beautiful magic a human can enjoy. I think that one who permanently destroys the life that innocence begets, and the subsequent generations that it destroys, has caused harm to exponential generations of people and steals the pinnacle of beauty from a harmless creature. For this reason, I believe the perpetrator’s punishment should be dealt with the rage of a thousand hurts…hurts that they have caused, and should subsequently also endure. Yep.
I agree with all but your conclusion, or I guess solution, to the problem these people pose.
Your solution will lead us to doom and destruction. To being no better than them.
And why risk keeping them alive any longer than absolutely necessary? All we end up doing is risk their escape to fuel petty revenge and to "feel better" as if it will actually give you that feeling you're looking for. It is objectively just worse and more risky for the rest of the children of the world than killing them quickly and without delay.
It is fine to want revenge on those who would commit atrocities against children.
It is righteous even.
Revenge is not justice, and it never will be. They are distinct.
Justice is righteous.
What about instances within the Bible of righteous revenge?
There is no distinction. It isn't black and white like that, and absolutely never was.
Reminder that you are commanded to hate evil.
Vengeance is God's. The Bible is clear.
Romans 12:17-21 17 Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. 18 If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. 19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. 20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. 21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
I would not describe God's vengeance as the same thing people are talking about here with their revenge fantasy. That is the distinction. God's vengeance is just, the revenge porn being fantasied about here is abhorrent. Grab the millstone and get it over with.
And are you reminding me to hate evil or to hate people who do evil?
Why the f*ck would we listen to an argument protecting child torturers. This is the exact type of person that needs this treatment. Time to get medieval on her and all her customers.
That would be one thing if torture didn't have downstream affects deleterious to decent people. Develop a machine that kills them and somehow operates itself. Or have them kill eachother. But making an affair out of torture is not good for a man wanting a clean conscience. I won't dehumanize myself to impress anyone.
No, the argument is Matthew 18:6; "But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
Do that rather than torture them like a depraved, mentally ill lunatic who wants to fulfill their revenge fantasy.
Obviously not everyone here is Christian, but I wonder how many of the 16 people who upvoted this depraved, animalistic nonsense proclaim Christ as their Lord?
No one who thinks that the solution is to do to these people what they do to children is on the side of good, but is rather blinded by the Devil. It is an affront to God.
fren i just want you to know where i stand. fk her--------wall
I'd absolutely agree with lining her up on the wall and summarily executing her. Where I hop off is the revenge porn others go on about, complete with torture and everything else Satan loves.
You sound guilty as hell. Thats a lot of virtue signaling. In defense of what? Punishing a monster? Im wondering now if YOU are not the affront to God. You ramble on an awful lot in defense ….
Jesus Christ quite literally says to give these people a peaceful death by drowning. What more do you want me to say here? God is wrong?
I will give you one more chance to exhibit a modicum of critical thought by clarifying my position: The original post pisses me off to no end, same as it obviously does you. This is the reason I am so irritated in these comments. Reading that shit is not the greatest way to produce a level-headed conversation on punishment.
But to make it worse, we already have this evil shit in the world and then your emotionally unstable ass comes in ready to torture people instead of just get rid of them once and for all. Because it's much better to risk keeping them alive for 1 second more than necessary over simply killing them.
You need it. You need to torture these people for some deranged reason. Otherwise, you'd accept the fact I want them executed and get the fuck off my case. But you don't, because you aren't interested in punishing them. You're fucking depraved and will attack anyone who doesn't agree with you to defend what you know is depraved.
The question that you raise now is … what are YOU afraid of. I understand your argument for pretty much all other crimes. However, using the innocent for sexual and sadistic gratifications decouples the offender from philosophical machinations of righteousness and justice. Your argument is apologistic in defense of pedophiles. Why is that???
I fear God.
Your argument is baseless and born of a delusional misconception of reality.
If you choose when to apply morality on a case-by-case basis, it is not morality. And it is not of God, Who is the basis of morality, and Who is absolute. He will not selectively apply punishment on judgement day.
Basically, your argument is meaningless as the base assumptions being made are unsubstantiated and wrong.
Furthermore, to reference a common twitter meme, if I say "I like pancakes" and you respond with "so you hate waffles?", you have invented an entirely new sentence and are simply arguing a straw man.
So I don't think you understand my argument to even a small degree.
If I say "torture is always wrong", and you hear "pedophiles should be excused of their crimes and treated with leniency", you display a severe lack of critical thought and are seemingly no more intelligent than a liberal. You'd certainly be behaving and responding in the exact same way they do.
Righteous anger at the crimes these vile demon-scum commit against children will never justify your unrighteous and demonic view of what punishment they should receive. Never. Your dark fantasies of torture and revenge will always remain nearly as demonic as the people you claim to hate. Both their desires and actions, as well as yours, are born of Satan.
Frankly, who or what do you even stand for?
Jesus Christ, the Lord our God, and He who morality comes forth from? He who refused to stone the adulterous woman and instead told her: "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."?
Maybe God as presented exclusively in the Old Testament? The Old Testament where we are told: "Do not say, “I will repay evil”; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.”?
Or how about the constitution, our great founding document? Surely you believe in this? This which you apply selectively as the arbiter of when it "truly" applies according to some contrived notion of whom moral law applies to?
No, it seems to me that whatever you might stand for takes a back seat to a more primal desire for revenge and to a deep-seated darkness that is born of the Devil.
Now, any more questions?
Interrogatories 101: The guilty will ramble on about virtue, and apply several logical attack fallacies to deflect from their guilt. YOU CHECK ALL BLOCKS
You are 100% either a Fedboi, or a Pedophile. My money is on both.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Edit: Seriously though, I'd love to see you retort one thing I said, point out a single logical fallacy (other than the ad hominem I employed by calling you a liberal that clearly hurt your fee fees, since that was in response to your illiterate ass calling me a pedophile (by insinuation)), and/or prove to me that you're not just too fucking lazy to read hence pulling out "rambling".
Good fucking luck KEK
đź’‘ That u