The 66 year and 6 month plan to save the US & The World? Eisenhower cover January 4, 1960 to July 4, 2026 is 66 years and 6 months.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🌎 WWG1WGAWW 🌍
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
Eisenhower?
He's the guy that starved millions of Germans after the war.
To hell with him, he was as bad as Churchill.
Cabal goon.
Yes. I've read about Eisenhower's treatment of German POWs after the war. Sickening, really. On the other hand, one of the very few things my father (10th Mountain ski trooper in the Italian Alps) ever said to me about the war was related to how horribly the Germans treated captured Americans and for that matter some of their tactics during the war. There was a LOT of anger over that.
All that said, Eisenhower wasn't one-dimensional, and his famous "military-industrial complex" speech near the end of his second term is BASED (although he was not a very engaging speaker) and in particular when talking about how America could be fully taken over by corrupt forces, his voice shows, to me, real concern and distress.
https://www.qwant.com/?q=eisenhower%27s+%22military-industrial+complex%22+speech+full+video+or+audio
I think he was, at bottom, a patriot and was seriously concerned for the future of America and of the world. If America falls, the world falls -- freedom will die without at least one strong nation standing up for it, and Ike clearly knew that. His war experiences surely branded that truth deep in his mind.
Thank you for making that more nuanced for me fren. I'm far away and don't know all the details. I was aware of his "military-industrial complex" speech though.
America has never been for freedom... Every single war in the history of the US has literally been theatre, from beginning to end. For example, The USSR and their communist state was created by Rockefeller/Rothschild as a necessary "opposition" to Fascism (when they were really the exact same "ism"), and to act as the "turncoat" for both world wars. Their "withdrawal" and "betrayal" was done intentionally to turn the tide at the prescribed time, right before America entered the war as "the savior." In both wars this happened after the US armed and funded both sides of the war as a "neutral party".
The USSR's Communist State also provided the introduction and driving force for the separation of all property ownership into "beneficial ownership" and "control ownership" (trustee); a "corporate trust" in Government form. The USSR is exactly the same entity type that they had created to take over all of corporatedom (everything is run by a singular Trust). This system has since been applied to every country in the world (at least all the ones in the UN).
Continuing this example, the Cold War was created by the same people, and controlled both sides from the beginning specifically so they would have a boogeyman to fight against. You must have "an enemy" to wage war, but the "Cold War" wasn't fought in the USSR or the US, it was fought in third world countries.
They created this completely fake war (not fake for the people who died, or even the people who were led around by the propaganda, but fake on the largest scale) so they could put every country in the world into their central banking system and the United Nations (both of which institutions were also created by Rockefeller/Rothschild). It didn't actually matter which went "democratic" (which is a lie) or which went "communist" (which is the same fricken lie). It was all about putting people into the same system of bondage.
The reasons that these were necessary steps for their upcoming One World Government are too numerous to get into here. But thinking that America was ever anything but a system designed specifically as one side of a two pronged system of "opposition" (controlled opposition) is not supported by the evidence.
America is just one major piece of a Hegelian dialectic, applied to socially engineering a Utopia, and it was designed to be that from day one (1787).
No argument with anything you say, Slyver, except for your first sentence.
America's government began getting corrupted on Day 1, and the forces of evil / the ancient Cabal / bankers / money-grubbing psychopaths / etc have beavered away at America's institutions non-stop since the Articles of Confederation, before the Constitution changed our loose confederation of States into a more centrally-controlled republic. Yes, America has been a bully to other nations for its entire existence. Sometimes a friend, of course, but even then with monetary or strategic overtones.
But as for America's original INTENT and the heart of her people -- not to mention our founding documents, in particular the Declaration of Independence -- America was and IS like no other nation in history. The Declaration set off a firestorm of interest in FREEDOM around the world; it created what can well be characterized as a global Great Awakening, and lead to the French Revolution and other revolutionary movements as well. Right into modern times -- the freedom movement in China that was crushed at Tianamen Square, the people in Hong Kong begging for America to be the "America we know you can be" when the CCP started really cracking down there are examples -- America has been a NECESSARY symbol of freedom to the peoples of the world, despite her increasing corruption. Trump's administration brought those positive perceptions back to life, although of course now Biden has tarnished our image (and our reality) more than most of us thought possible.
So, my point is that your anger at America's corruption and other faults is on target, but the EXPRESSED intent and the hearts and minds of patriotic Americans -- yes, that's a smaller contingent than it used to be -- are not only "for" freedom, but are freedom's last and only hope going forward. A world without a revitalized America -- and by that I mean a far-less CORRUPT and militaristic America -- would be a hellscape mankind might never escape from.
We The People may have, from the beginning, believed in a "Free Nation." There are certainly many people today who believe in a "Free Nation." I suggest that pretty much no one has any idea what that means, but people absolutely believe in it. They have fought for it and died for it for centuries.
From what I have found, the vast majority believe that a Free Nation is the opposite of what a Free People actually is, but an elaboration of the intrinsic and subtle lies of our collective beliefs is a larger discussion for another time. I suggest however, that We The People have been misled, and the vast majority believe the opposite of the Truth, and they have since day one. Even the DoI, the flowery words which you laud, has intentional fuckery contained within it to promote these "opposite beliefs". I'll get back to that in a bit.
My research suggests that the following "Founding Fathers" were agents of the Cabal beyond a reasonable doubt (for me, based on the evidence):
I don't know about any others, because I didn't do "deep dives" into any other founding fathers specifically. These are the four that I did, and they all turned up "Cabal" beyond a reasonable doubt (again, by my assessment based on the evidence I found).
My research suggests that Controlled Opposition takes many forms. There are the people that push the main agenda (Alexander Hamilton e.g.). There are the people that push an agenda opposite to the main agenda (Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin). There are people that are useful "physical agents" to drive the "propaganda of the deed" (George Washington as the "Front Man" and War Leader e.g.). Every effort in history requires these agent types. They always follow the same pattern. The main agenda must be pushed. The reasons are obvious. The opposite agenda must also be pushed. The reasons are NOT obvious, but obvious once you see the pattern. The opposite agenda will happen. There will ALWAYS be an opposition to the main agenda. The only way to ensure that the main agenda moves forward is to Be the agency that pushes the "opposition" agenda. There will be a Front Man to push the physical part of the effort as well. It is essential to also make sure that person is your agent.
I am oversimplifying things for the sake of brevity, but the pattern is sound, and found at every stage of the currently running Utopian Dialectic, which began (intentionally began) sometime in 1500s I think. (I mean the current version of the Controlled Dialectic. There were previous versions that were run through the Religious Trust, controlled by the same group).
As an example of how this plays out, and I choose this only because you brought it up, there are so many more examples. One of the unalienable Rights given to us by Natural Law (or God, or Source, or "The Universe" if you prefer) is the Right to defend our Property. This was laid out explicitly in the works that inspired the DoI, notably the philosophical efforts of John Locke, who is specifically attributed with that inspiration.
Notice I said "Right to defend." We do not have a Right to our property by Natural Law. We do not have a Right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness (freedom of choice) by Natural Law. Every single one of those things can be taken away from us at any time, and Natural Law says that is totally fine. We do however, have the unalienable Right to defend all of those things, given to us by the only actual (non-fraudulent) Power That Be. The word "defend" was explicitly not included in the DoI, and I think that was also fuckery. This is atm just a hypothesis, but I think that word was excluded to make sure we didn't rebel against the government they were setting up, ensuring:
Never happened again.
Of course this hypothesis clashes with 2A, but there's more to it, and it isn't worth elaborating at this time because it's not a huge point.
Regardless, Property was purposefully excluded from the DoI. There are all sorts of explanations for "why" it was excluded, as there is for all of the most important issues (everything really important gets "debunked" e.g.). People believe those explanations. However, I suggest there is one reason, and one reason only, for why that was left off. Because if it was included anywhere in the DoI, or the Constitution, or anything that is pushed on the populace that leads us to our beliefs (propaganda), then Income Taxes, and Property Taxes would have been very hard to sell. Without these taxes, Bank Loans (on this scale) are impossible. So instead of including a clear and explicit statement of our Right to defend our property (which can't be taken away, but we can be convinced that it can), the exact opposite of that Right was written into the Constitution (end of 5A):
This makes it explicit that the Sovereign Government can do with your property whatever it wishes, whenever it wishes. Again, this would have been a really tough sell if "property" (or more appropriately, the Right to defend your property) was one of the unalienable Rights included in the DoI. "Property Rights" was such a huge part of the "inspiration" (Locke) and its exclusion is so glaringly obvious, that the only conclusion (along with other evidence of Jeffersonian fuckery) is that it was left out of the DoI on purpose so that Banks could do their Loan thing for the US Govt, which of course, they did.
As an aside, the Sovereign claim on an Individuals property by the US Govt is itself legally impossible (a contradiction between Natural Law and Constitutional Law). A corporation (legal fiction, such as a governmental corporation) can't be a Sovereign (Ultimate Authority) because a corporation can't make decisions, only Natural Persons can. That particular piece of fuckery (sovereign corporation) is a larger exposure, outside of the scope of this response, but I will be creating a post soon that will elaborate this in detail with the evidence.
My statements are not made out of anger, but out of hope. Hope that we can learn the frauds that bind our thoughts, so We The Entire People can learn the path to transcend our box.
Maybe you are correct, and I don't disagree, but I suggest we can't possibly make it to where we both hope it goes unless we understand the real fuckery that occurred from the very beginning. This includes the Sacred Cows, such as the DoI, or the Founding Fathers. We MUST understand the full extent of Controlled Opposition to understand the box our minds have been placed in (The Matrix). If we do not, we will fall back into the same trap with the next "good ruler" that comes along and "saves" us.
Wow, thank you for this.
Clearly a message here, imo. Unknown if Eisenhower had to play a role for survival, but it looks like he stacked the 1960 election with Patriots Nixon and JFK, and possibly set something in motion on this date in 1960. "The 1960 “Stolen” Election (partially) explained": https://greatawakening.win/p/16b68z4s2i/the-1960-stolen-election-partial/
Note that Truman was still alive and possibly operating in the background. So it could be the 66 year "Truman Show" if he was free to operate once he was in the background (presumably with the military). Speculation that there is a COG authority former C-I-C may hold until death: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b64KeljM/is-there-a-continuity-of-governm/
Context here is that something happened in Antarctica 1957-1959 that triggered something. Note Antarctica Treaty signed Dec 1, 1959 in Washington, D.C. just about 1 month prior to this Time Magazine cover.
https://www.ats.aq/e/antarctictreaty.html
"Truman Show" Interesting comms.
I think "Truman" is an alternative and less common spelling of the name "Trueman"
Wasn't the plot of The Truman Show that we indeed are living in a matrix. And Truman physically ran his boat into hard evidence of it all being an illusion (He was sailing and ran into the ice wall that flat earthers think is around the edge of the earth ( I think that's what they believe)
Lots of "soft disclosure" in that movie, including observation from the "moon office" showing there is something weird about the moon, restricted travel to certain parts of the planet, and the shape of the "studio" that Truman is inside (snowglobe type of structure with level land and water) with an outer dome "firmament" type structure.
Note that the Encyclopedia Americana from 1949 or late 50s states that at one point near Antarctica (icewall) the firmament is at a height of 13,000 ft, if I recall correctly. It appears to be some sort of electromagnetic field.
I've never heard of the starving part, but didn't Eisenhower warn us of the military industrial complex?
I think over 2 million German POWs died of starvation and exposure because of Eisenhower's orders. Food supplies were cut to their camps.
This is from memory so somebody else might have more detail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUNEpyaPlDs
"Eisenhower's Rhine Meadows Death Camps Documentary"; YouTube asking for sign-in, must be brutal
To be left on a meadow with absolutely nothing is brutal, but that is not the reason for age restriction, if you consider all the hollywood movies your kids are allowed to see.The screaming kids in the Podesta vid I found much more brutal.