It still amazes me that there are people out there that refuse to buy anything but the official narrative. With all the evidence, people, video, physical. That is an incredible video. Amazing how something can go that fast just barely off the ground and hit its target.
Amazing, but not impossible. All the evidence (wreckage), people (witnesses on ground and in the air), video (airplane), radar (path tracking) death toll, etc. substantiates the directed crash dive of flight 77. When an airplane is flying at a relative height of less than half a wingspan, it is in "ground effect" where the wing lift coefficient is doubled and the airplane is almost buoyed by the effect. (The first flights of the U-2 were troubled by the inability to land, due to this effect.)
It amazes me that people can express opinions about what is or is not possible when they do not understand flight mechanics or aerodynamics. (Actually, I am no longer amazed. I am just disappointed.)
You make sense in regards to flight characteristics. I just don't see the airplanes huge tail in that video. The Pentagon is only 77' tall so even in the video, the tail would be abundantly visible since the tail itself is about a 25' tall triangluar shape
There is only a frame of the aircraft in approach and the image is so poor that most of the fuselage (unpainted aluminum) and tail (white) fades into the sky background. What can be seen is the horizontal color stripes of the American Airlines livery---which everyone mistakes for being a missile. The tail wasn't to be seen.
Besides which, the wreckage was specific to the Boeing 757.
I guess you think your imaginary world is superior to the real world, because that is where you are. Since it could never have been a Scud (too slow, no dive angle, too large), nor an ALCM (flew too low, too large). And all these silly claims run away from the fact that it was identified by WITNESSES as being an airliner.
Especially when there are many, who agree on what they see, and testify against your fantasy. (Don't forget the broken lamppost.) How can I be wrong when all the evidence lines up? How can you be right when you haven't a clue about Scud or cruise missiles?
the building was filled with explosives beforehand. it doesn't matter if anything hit it... and any new video evidence coming out now that they've had 20+ years to work on it is a little hard to take seriously.
I have destroyed a lot of scud missiles. This was not a scud missile. I didn't see the impact, but I did see the explosion in real time. Looked like a black cloud from a 2,000 lb bomb or a little more. It was also pretty low for a normal cruise missile. But my next question has always been: Where is Flight 77 ?? And supposedly they found both black boxes.
Yes it was a missile, but not a SCUD missile. SCUD missiles can't hug the terrain like that. This is a cruise missile of some sort.
Why would they claim it was a Scud missile of all possibilities. Once you review the Scud missile technology you know it can't be a Scud.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yrj146vLs1Y/UKodWfvs3DI/AAAAAAAABG0/7R1q0vtLcGs/s1600/scud.jpg
This is so fucking funny
Lol
Yeah, smells rotten, but definitely not a plane.
Maybe a JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile) prototype. Which made in U.S. by Lockheed Martin. It is an air-launched cruise missile.
Photo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM#/media/File:Agm-158_JASSM.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM
https://archive.md/bKQmT
It still amazes me that there are people out there that refuse to buy anything but the official narrative. With all the evidence, people, video, physical. That is an incredible video. Amazing how something can go that fast just barely off the ground and hit its target.
Amazing, but not impossible. All the evidence (wreckage), people (witnesses on ground and in the air), video (airplane), radar (path tracking) death toll, etc. substantiates the directed crash dive of flight 77. When an airplane is flying at a relative height of less than half a wingspan, it is in "ground effect" where the wing lift coefficient is doubled and the airplane is almost buoyed by the effect. (The first flights of the U-2 were troubled by the inability to land, due to this effect.)
It amazes me that people can express opinions about what is or is not possible when they do not understand flight mechanics or aerodynamics. (Actually, I am no longer amazed. I am just disappointed.)
You make sense in regards to flight characteristics. I just don't see the airplanes huge tail in that video. The Pentagon is only 77' tall so even in the video, the tail would be abundantly visible since the tail itself is about a 25' tall triangluar shape
There is only a frame of the aircraft in approach and the image is so poor that most of the fuselage (unpainted aluminum) and tail (white) fades into the sky background. What can be seen is the horizontal color stripes of the American Airlines livery---which everyone mistakes for being a missile. The tail wasn't to be seen.
Besides which, the wreckage was specific to the Boeing 757.
I guess you think your imaginary world is superior to the real world, because that is where you are. Since it could never have been a Scud (too slow, no dive angle, too large), nor an ALCM (flew too low, too large). And all these silly claims run away from the fact that it was identified by WITNESSES as being an airliner.
Especially when there are many, who agree on what they see, and testify against your fantasy. (Don't forget the broken lamppost.) How can I be wrong when all the evidence lines up? How can you be right when you haven't a clue about Scud or cruise missiles?
the building was filled with explosives beforehand. it doesn't matter if anything hit it... and any new video evidence coming out now that they've had 20+ years to work on it is a little hard to take seriously.
Kinda makes you wonder who they arranged to be left in the affected section at the appointed time.
More evidence that we need to hang Bush 43 and Dick Cheney. They are the true masterminds behind 9/11.
I have destroyed a lot of scud missiles. This was not a scud missile. I didn't see the impact, but I did see the explosion in real time. Looked like a black cloud from a 2,000 lb bomb or a little more. It was also pretty low for a normal cruise missile. But my next question has always been: Where is Flight 77 ?? And supposedly they found both black boxes.
Declas ongoing…. can’t wait for the real meat of 911
Not available in the UK.
Anyone knows what’s on the vice and where’s a similar copy?
Backup video
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FeMG3QieExGK/
https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.bitchute.com/video/kvpxYuZH8GZp/