Okay, now look at social media and MSM. Any of them, such as PBS and others, that receives government funding, must lose any taxpayer or government funding whether used to create, buy off, impose, request, demand censorship.
Not huge enough. Three out of hundreds? A step in the right direction but far from huge. Minuscule or even pathetic are the words you were looking for.
Okay, now look at social media and MSM. Any of them, such as PBS and others, that receives government funding, must lose any taxpayer or government funding whether used to create, buy off, impose, request, demand censorship.
It is a conflict of interest for a government to provide any benefits or funding to the press to begin with.
It should be directly illegal.
Why is our defense department spending anything to censor the free speech of Americans in the first place?
Sauce: https://dailycaller.com/2023/06/22/house-rule-pentagon-censorship/
Double-sauce (Twitter)! ThanQ, Fren!
https://twitter.com/RepMarkAlford/status/1671595943849005058
u/#byebye
Looks like a big win.
Newsguard website, scroll down at look at their partners scrolling across the page.
https://www.newsguardtech.com/
Wow!
US Depts of defense, and state... WHO 🤔
!!!Wow this is [censored]
Not huge enough. Three out of hundreds? A step in the right direction but far from huge. Minuscule or even pathetic are the words you were looking for.
Perhaps it can set a precedent.