You are correct in more ways than you may know. What lawyers learn in Law School as the de facto teaching is called 'Law Positive'. Constitutional Law is taught as a hindsight.
We say that if a law is unconstitutional, we shouldn't follow it. It's wrong and should be changed.
They say, that every law is constitutional, as long as it passed was passed as law, and therefore you have to follow it, and if you want it deemed unconstitutional, you have to fight it in court.
Wonder if she legitimately passed the bar exam. Doesn’t seem like she has a clear grasp of the law. Guess time will tell.
Law yes. Constitution is not law to them.
You are correct in more ways than you may know. What lawyers learn in Law School as the de facto teaching is called 'Law Positive'. Constitutional Law is taught as a hindsight.
They also twist much of it in law school.
We say that if a law is unconstitutional, we shouldn't follow it. It's wrong and should be changed.
They say, that every law is constitutional, as long as it passed was passed as law, and therefore you have to follow it, and if you want it deemed unconstitutional, you have to fight it in court.
How true.
Bar and Law are very different things. (One could say the bar is very low, kek)
I love to see them freak out when you ask what the LSAT scores were...
Because then everyone would see they didn't earn their slots at the prestigious institutions they gain their credibility from...