Every single system that exists is controlled by the Cabal (or was). My research suggests there are three different types of people who run the show in these systems:
Members of the Cabal. These are the people who are under direct control of the control system (pedophilia, "Satanism" (a misnomer, but close enough), etc.) In other words, they are agents of the Cabal, and they know perfectly well that they are agents of the Cabal.
Agents of Opposition. These are people that act as spies, or if you prefer, agents provocateur, and they know that they act as such. They purposefully make groups look "crazy," or "evil," or otherwise spread disinformation in opposition to their apparent affiliation. (The FBI's COINTELPRO is a perfect example of such a group of spies.) They don't necessarily know they are working for the Cabal, or that the Cabal exists, much less that such an organization is the real controller of their employer (though some do, and thus also fall into category one), but they know that they are spies, purposefully working contrary to their surface level affiliation.
True Believers. These are people who are controlled through directed propaganda, and by that control do exactly what they need to do to fulfill the requirements of some oppositional agency. This is where most people in any organization would fall.
In other words, all systems act as part of the Cabal network, but not that many people necessarily know what they are doing. Or, such as in this case, they know their work might not be "good," but they are doing what they are ordered to do because a) it's the military, and b) it's for "National Security."
In addition, actions are compartmentalized. If you break apart a system enough, the vast majority will have no idea the actual project that is being worked on.
Even in group one, where people are aware that they are acting on behalf of the Cabal, not everyone is necessarily doing what they are doing because they like it. I have no doubt there are plenty that do it because they have to, to play ball at all. I have a feeling that most of Q, or Q adjacent fall into this category; i.e. Insiders, working to bring down a system they know well.
We, as individuals, are "the only way". We each have to fix ourselves as needed. Until then, the cabal will appear on the stage to mirror-back to us our dominant collective beliefs.
I'd write a post on this but it would be downvoted into oblivion. Maybe some day. I'll entitle "The least popular post to ever appear on GA".... hahaha
It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.
Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.
I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, a few months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.
If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements that smack of "this is the truth." This suggests "I know you are wrong" to anyone who has a different assessment, which immediately puts a persons back up. Rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this." The very best way to make statements is to not make them at all, rather show things with evidence.
You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.
Your statement sounds very interesting. So you don't believe in "the plan" or do you think the plan is for each of us to fix ourselves? Maybe I've questioned too much of your thoughts, but they are (to me) interesting, and you really haven't said much to this point.
I haven't said anything here yet. Waiting for certain tides to turn....6 years now.
"The Plan" is we learn how reality works and adjust accordingly. This is the "Great Awakening" part 1.
Nothing changes until the collective changes en masse. We each see what we BELIEVE in this world, individually and collectively. Step 1 is to fix yourself. Fear and judgment are at the basis of it all.
How's that for a quick summary? Not a popular message round these parts...yet!
Some of our frens here are married to an idea of what they believe “The Plan” is. Any suggestion/interpretation to the contrary and they shit their pampers.
I 100% believe there is/was a plan. I question the morality of letting our borders be over-run, our military decimated, fentanyl flooding our streets killing our children by the 10s of Thousands, retarded policies that are destroying our financial system, dumping $Billions of $$ WE DONT HAVE into Ukraine, on, and on.
AND STILL, with all that shit, I still dont see a precipice anywhere near close enough that will completely wake normies up.
Not bad for a quick summary. I'm not sure how everyone on this website would feel about it, but at least you put your thoughts out there and they don't seem really drastic, so I think your assessment is as good as anyone's at this point in time. Thanks.
Every single system that exists is controlled by the Cabal (or was). My research suggests there are three different types of people who run the show in these systems:
In other words, all systems act as part of the Cabal network, but not that many people necessarily know what they are doing. Or, such as in this case, they know their work might not be "good," but they are doing what they are ordered to do because a) it's the military, and b) it's for "National Security."
In addition, actions are compartmentalized. If you break apart a system enough, the vast majority will have no idea the actual project that is being worked on.
Even in group one, where people are aware that they are acting on behalf of the Cabal, not everyone is necessarily doing what they are doing because they like it. I have no doubt there are plenty that do it because they have to, to play ball at all. I have a feeling that most of Q, or Q adjacent fall into this category; i.e. Insiders, working to bring down a system they know well.
You got it Slyver.
We, as individuals, are "the only way". We each have to fix ourselves as needed. Until then, the cabal will appear on the stage to mirror-back to us our dominant collective beliefs.
I'd write a post on this but it would be downvoted into oblivion. Maybe some day. I'll entitle "The least popular post to ever appear on GA".... hahaha
You'll almost certainly get at least one upvote (assuming I see it).
:)
And that's the main issue. It would be highly unlikely it gets pinned, which means maybe 40-50 people see it before it vanishes into the abyss.
Any suggestion I make that Q or Trump aren't going to save us all some day will not be well-regarded by the mods I suspect.
It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.
Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.
I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, a few months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.
If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements that smack of "this is the truth." This suggests "I know you are wrong" to anyone who has a different assessment, which immediately puts a persons back up. Rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this." The very best way to make statements is to not make them at all, rather show things with evidence.
You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.
Your statement sounds very interesting. So you don't believe in "the plan" or do you think the plan is for each of us to fix ourselves? Maybe I've questioned too much of your thoughts, but they are (to me) interesting, and you really haven't said much to this point.
I haven't said anything here yet. Waiting for certain tides to turn....6 years now.
"The Plan" is we learn how reality works and adjust accordingly. This is the "Great Awakening" part 1.
Nothing changes until the collective changes en masse. We each see what we BELIEVE in this world, individually and collectively. Step 1 is to fix yourself. Fear and judgment are at the basis of it all.
How's that for a quick summary? Not a popular message round these parts...yet!
Co-creative consciousness. Visualize it, and it will happen. If we all mastered this concept, we could beat the cabal with ease
HELL YES!
Some of our frens here are married to an idea of what they believe “The Plan” is. Any suggestion/interpretation to the contrary and they shit their pampers.
I 100% believe there is/was a plan. I question the morality of letting our borders be over-run, our military decimated, fentanyl flooding our streets killing our children by the 10s of Thousands, retarded policies that are destroying our financial system, dumping $Billions of $$ WE DONT HAVE into Ukraine, on, and on.
AND STILL, with all that shit, I still dont see a precipice anywhere near close enough that will completely wake normies up.
Not bad for a quick summary. I'm not sure how everyone on this website would feel about it, but at least you put your thoughts out there and they don't seem really drastic, so I think your assessment is as good as anyone's at this point in time. Thanks.