“Bigger than you can imagine”
"THE BEST IS YET TO COME."
Q stated quiet a few times “bigger than you can imagine…”
How big can we imagine this to be? Anyone got any mind blowing theories?
I agree with this. I find it very difficult to question the main narrative behind 9/11, at least as far as some people go. Building 7 raises some questions but without conclusive evidence I can't go based solely on speculation and likelihood of events alone.
What about the lack of any planes at the Pentagon and that crash site where there was just a crater?
I never looked into this in detail as it is emotionally difficult and if true, what is the point in knowing is the sad part.
I will say I have a very hard time believing any calls were made from the airplanes unless they were some kind of plane phone. That part has never made sense to me.
While there were phones built into some planes back then, mostly jumbo jets, you'd think the hijackers would have switched them off immediately since they're enabled from the flight cabin so they're not used at certain times like take-off and landing. So yeah, the call thing always sounded made up.
I remember standing there in shock watching News coverage. I remember seeing the video of the Pentagon. I very quickly was wondering about it. "Where's the plane?" I didnt have everything put together back then, but when resources became available to me online, I was already primed for the info.
I think the reason to know, is so that the whole picture makes sense, you can see the lengths they are willing to go to for their objectives and it helps prove that there Is an issue.
It is painful, but there is a reason to know in this case. At least the basics that it was lies.
Sure, I guess at this point I already know they were willing to commit treason, sell out our military, kidnap and rape children, start WW3, stage hate crimes, encourage rioting, threaten / kill SC judges, kill people through bad pharmaceuticals and lockdowns, etc
So this isn't out of the realm of that.
I realize this is a long vid, but personally I found it the most compelling argument I've ever seen on what really happened on 9/11. Lots of evidence presented in there, with a takeaway that differs greatly from the typical reasons given.
https://rumble.com/v2whir6-where-did-the-towers-go.html
Dr. Judy Wood does a stand-up job (IMO) detailing how the towers were taken down with directed energy weapons. Sounds crazy? Wait till you see her proof. She proves this from multiple angles and in the process disproves most of the other prevailing theories.
Much more likely planted explosives, there was major work done on the elevators in the months before hand and that's the perfect place to hide charges for imploding a skyscraper. Making things fantastical with energy weapons 1) turns off normies starting to awaken and 2) is just clickbaity in general.
How do you explain the lack of falling mass registered on the seismographs? Despite being far more mass than the King Dome (which was a controlled explosion), it registered far far lower on the seismographs.
Also, how do you explain cars on the bridge that had their engine blocks melted in place?
How do you explain the video evidence of steel girders falling off the building and literally turning to dust before they hit the ground?
How do you explain the bathtub (I think that's what they called it - it was part of the foundation designed to hold out river water I believe) having next to no damage, despite having a mountain of steel and concrete falling on top of it? How come there was next to no damage in the parkade just below ground level?
There's far more in the presentation, but those are some of the points I could remember (it's been five plus years since I saw it last).
I agree there was lots of shenanigans happening in the towers prior - but part of that was also moving out a ginormous amount of physical gold.
If the DEW theory is correct, it is still feasible that they would have planted explosives in the towers to aid in the pyrotechnics of the theatre...
She actually avoids the fantastical and tries not to make conclusions, only observations. Her presentation is very interesting. The way the towers dustified into nothing doesn’t align with any physics I’m aware of. That is sort of her main point. Also, how areas on the ground look like a bomb went off, only the leaves on the trees are totally unharmed.