For the stories that aren't fantasy and speculation. I learned some interesting things about drug companies, Covid, alternate treatments, and how the Government is used to drive private profits and censor alternative viewpoints.
The timing makes zero sense to me. You run a sting on the 2018 and 2020 elections when you control the entire Federal government and can monitor absolutely everything. And as soon as they certify the fraud you drop the full weight of the NSA, CISA, and DOJ on them with all the evidence. You don't wait until three years after you "lose" and get impeached and then indicted in the lead up to the 2024 election.
It'll be Trump presenting evidence for his defense, not the prosecution. As POTUS he'll have access to things we can only imagine.
Only a small sliver has been presented so far (in the Kari Lake case), and even then the judge limited it substantially.
Trump's case will be a criminal case with the foundational fact being that he knew the election was valid and somehow acted to thwart it. So the entire thrust of his defense will be spent debunking that in a criminal context.
It's the ideal setup for preventing all the evidence that has been held back thus far. The blank ballots being moved across state lines. The counting being halted. Poll workers being blocked or kicked out. Persons counting ballots multiple times after the counting had been halted. Markers being distributed instead of pens in red districts. Poll workers adjudicating those broken ballots en-masse in favor of Biden. All of Lindell's computer evidence can be in play now too.
Lastly, it being a criminal case means state secrets rights can't be asserted by prior administrations.
Or they let him present it, rule in his trial, and then the DOJ just sits on all of it like they did with the Hunter Biden stuff and refuses to follow up on anything. We seem to think here that presenting the truth is court causes winning, but that isn't true at all. All the facts Special Prosecutor Durham presented in Court didn't get Sussman or Danchenko convicted and those were trials of them. Imagine trying to even get the DOJ to prosecute based on something presented in a totally different trial.
The House committee has had Hunter's financial records for months. Having something and making the DOJ act appropriately on it are very different things.
State secrets also off the table. Cannot be invoked in a criminal case.
IIRC none of the other voting fraud cases were criminal (how could they be, they were all brought by candidates, not AGs).
This is the opportunity to present evidence without state secrets interference from the Obama/Clinton/Bush administrations.
What evidence?
Go do a search and find out plenty of other times and ways the Government lost or failed to produce evidence.
"We have it all."
Love,
Space Force
Having it all and forcing the Department of Justice to actually do something with it are very different things.
Okay doomer. Why are you here?
For the stories that aren't fantasy and speculation. I learned some interesting things about drug companies, Covid, alternate treatments, and how the Government is used to drive private profits and censor alternative viewpoints.
Well, you should figure out that Trump and the Q team have been running the biggest sting operation in history and they are going to win.
The timing makes zero sense to me. You run a sting on the 2018 and 2020 elections when you control the entire Federal government and can monitor absolutely everything. And as soon as they certify the fraud you drop the full weight of the NSA, CISA, and DOJ on them with all the evidence. You don't wait until three years after you "lose" and get impeached and then indicted in the lead up to the 2024 election.
If Trump didn't secure evidence when he left the White house he is an idiot and deserves to go to jail for not releasing evidence of the corruption.
He is not an idiot and so He must have the ability to strike back at the most impactful moment.
Why else is the swamp still so afraid of him and raiding Mar-A-Lago and trying to get him out of the presidental race if they were in control.
I suspect if the swamp was that afraid of him they would given him a more subtle version of the Kennedy treatment.
I thought they tried with giving him Covid and the times that he had to evacuate because of riots or e when he just disappeared for no stated reason.
It'll be Trump presenting evidence for his defense, not the prosecution. As POTUS he'll have access to things we can only imagine.
Only a small sliver has been presented so far (in the Kari Lake case), and even then the judge limited it substantially.
Trump's case will be a criminal case with the foundational fact being that he knew the election was valid and somehow acted to thwart it. So the entire thrust of his defense will be spent debunking that in a criminal context.
It's the ideal setup for preventing all the evidence that has been held back thus far. The blank ballots being moved across state lines. The counting being halted. Poll workers being blocked or kicked out. Persons counting ballots multiple times after the counting had been halted. Markers being distributed instead of pens in red districts. Poll workers adjudicating those broken ballots en-masse in favor of Biden. All of Lindell's computer evidence can be in play now too.
Lastly, it being a criminal case means state secrets rights can't be asserted by prior administrations.
You don't really think they're going to just let him roll into Court and prove this, do you?
You mean something to the effect of he tries to present evidence and the judge blocks him?
I wouldn't be shocked if that's what happens. 🤣
Or they let him present it, rule in his trial, and then the DOJ just sits on all of it like they did with the Hunter Biden stuff and refuses to follow up on anything. We seem to think here that presenting the truth is court causes winning, but that isn't true at all. All the facts Special Prosecutor Durham presented in Court didn't get Sussman or Danchenko convicted and those were trials of them. Imagine trying to even get the DOJ to prosecute based on something presented in a totally different trial.
Just a few hours ago, Trump asked, "Where's Hunter?"
Where’s Hunter? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/110822190599955920
Hunter becomes the hunted.
u/#q3850
When is Hunter's first piss test ?
The House committee has had Hunter's financial records for months. Having something and making the DOJ act appropriately on it are very different things.
This idea only works if the Fed Govt allows it.