ASK YOURSELF THIS:
-
It all comes down to this question. Were the rights of the people violated by Trump? Was Trump trying to win though he actually lost? Or was Trump, upholding the Constitution, seeking to expose the election fraud and show the true will of the people?
-
Trump sought every avenue he could to get the truth revealed, and was blocked at every turn. Trump peacefully left the white house knowing full well that the courts never even heard the evidence and denied him standing. This violated Trump’s rights and our Constitutional rights.
-
And yet Pence has the nerve to say that Trump "put himself over the Constitution". Those that voted to certify on January 7th, put themselves over the Constitution without even a consideration of the evidence of election fraud. Even though just a few hours earlier over 100 congressmen came with evidence of election fraud. Congress had solid examples of election fraud evidence in their hands, and they chose to ignore it. Congress, sworn to uphold the Constitution had evidence of the people's rights being violated in an election and they would not even look at it before voting on the issue.
-
That night I watched Pence say, "I MUST count the votes and certify", full knowing of the violations against the people's choice in the election. Pence and Congress violated 3 U.S. Code § 15 (d) (2) (D) which states that "No vote or paper from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to any vote or paper from any State, and other questions arising in the matter, shall have been finally disposed of." And instead of upholding this and investigating the election fraud they simply voted without putting to rest any of the questions and concerns brought to them.
-
Members of Congress had brought evidence in writing of violations of 3 U.S. Code § 15 (d) (2) (B) (ii) (I) & (II) "The electors of the State were not lawfully certified under a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors according to section 5(a)(1)." and "The vote of one or more electors has not been regularly given."
-
Electors being you and me with the right to vote.
-
In other words Congress had evidence of the people's voting rights were violated and they chose to suppress that evidence and violate the people's rights further, committing treason against the people.
-
3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
(d)Procedure at Joint Session Generally.—
(2)Action on certificate.—
(B)Requirements for objections or questions.—
(i)Objections.—No objection or other question arising in the matter shall be in order unless the objection or question—
(I)is made in writing;
(II)is signed by at least one-fifth of the Senators duly chosen and sworn and one-fifth of the Members of the House of Representatives duly chosen and sworn; and
(III)in the case of an objection, states clearly and concisely, without argument, one of the grounds listed under clause (ii).
(ii)Grounds for objections.—The only grounds for objections shall be as follows:
(I)The electors of the State were not lawfully certified under a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors according to section 5(a)(1).
(II)The vote of one or more electors has not been regularly given.
(C)Consideration of objections and questions.—
(i)In general.—
When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State, or other question arising in the matter, shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections and questions shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections and questions to the House of Representatives for its decision.
(ii)Determination.—
No objection or any other question arising in the matter may be sustained unless such objection or question is sustained by separate concurring votes of each House.
(D)Reconvening.—
When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No vote or paper from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to any vote or paper from any State, and other questions arising in the matter, shall have been finally disposed of.
Excellant post - thanks for sharing. Sticky request sent.
This regular order was superceded by Nancy's emergency rule.
☝️THIS!!!
Hence the need to protect the 'insurrection' narrative.
This is excellent and erudite, although for me the questions become redundant at the first hurdle (in this case paragraph). With figures in Congress openly having said things multiple times in the run-up to the election - Pelosi' "He will not be President, no matter the final count", Biden's "voter fraud organization" and "I don't need you to vote for me", etc etc etc - surely those are incitements to then reasonably question the subsequent results. That's just fundamental. But what do I know, I just think rationally rather than emotionally 😁
when did pelosi say "no matter the count?" i remember Bidens freudian slip though.
Trump just called him Liddle Mike Pence. That’s a recurring accusation about Pence that has circulated for quite a few years. Back to the 4ch days. I don’t see how anyone that Trump would label “Liddle”(kid rapist) could possibly be playing a role on Team White Hats.
Pence is dirty. Trump just said he’s dirty. Has always been dirty. He’s controlled by DS because he has very large disgusting skeletons in his closet. He violated the constitution by not protecting the voice of the American people when their was vast amounts of election fraud already exposed. Hell the count stopping at 10pm in multiple states and Biden’s miraculous, fraudulent jump up in votes was enough to overturn the entire thing. He’s a traitor to us all that sold out the country to save his own worthless existence.
Pence is a “no deal” DS traitor.
Exactly.
Think about this, if Pence had held up the procedure and eventually Trump was proven to have won, Trump would have stayed in the White House for another 4 years being accused of stealing the election from Biden. He would have been dragged through the mud for 4 years with them claiming he was illegitimate and the DS would still be in control. The plan was for the election to be stolen and let this dumbo bankrupt the Fed, destroy the economy and cause inflation to wake up the people. Once the people are awake, you can show the proof of how the election was stolen and expose all the treasonous acts by the selected officials all the way down the line to the vote counters in local districts. What a marvelous plan indeed. MAGA means what it says. We will have a Constitutional Republic if the DS doesn’t launch the nukes first.
Yes, and what a terrible and expensive lesson it has been.
Especially for those of us that were early to the movement. Waiting on the sheep to wake up!
In one of the SCOTUS rulings related to the results of the 2020 election, they said the states (and by extension you and I) do not have STANDING.
My question is: Do we (you and I) have STANDING?
This question of STANDING has been BOTHERING me since 2020/2021....
Good question! This SCOTUS ruling and several others seem to be counter to the best interests of our country and against Pres. Trump. It makes my head spin.
Mark Esper also said that Trump cares more about himself than the U.S. if this is the case, why didn’t all those in political office resign in disgust because their “values” didn’t align with President Trump? Cowards, turncoats and slanderous villains is what they were and are.
In the end though I don't believe Trump EVER conceded. I think that's important and will be s talking point for future Social Studies teachers.
Remember days prior to J6, how it was reported that Trump pushed and pushed Pence in his power to preside & rule over the congressional members decision to send the electoral college certification votes back to the states to investigate/determine election fraud?
And then last year a bill was passed into law that takes that power of the VP over the congressional members during a contested presidential election?
The Deep State congressional members wrote that bill into law, thought they would be protected if/when another republican presided over the joint session to have that power to send back the electoral college votes to the respective states for further investigation of election fraud.
It was in the push/plan for them to make that law (brought on by none other than Adam Schiff) so that when Trump wins in 2024, the presiding VP (which will most likely be Kamala Harris) CANNOT have such power over the congressional members!
Their plan back fired!
So, now if that law is not remanded, Kamala Harris does not have the power in joint session disputes over the presidential election to send those electoral college votes back to the states for review/investigation of a stolen election & voter fraud. Which as we know all too well will be the cheating Democrats' tactic that will push the narrative that Trump cheated in the 2024 election!
These people are stupid, Trump baited them and although it took approx two years, he got what was needed to further ensure free & fair elections!
I wonder if on J6 Pence disregarded that constitutional law intentionally, either knowingly or unknowingly? Was Pence playing his role in the plan? Or was Pence deep in the Deep States' clutches for a promise of a presidential win in 2024? Is Pence a part of the compartmentalized plan? Or is he just another Deep State swamp member?
Brilliant move by Team Trump (Military plan)!!!
The D.S. and Globalists are overwhelming us with so many lies it's difficult to keep the truth in order and almost impossible to counter all their lies with the facts
It had to be this way.
You know this.
You're watching a movie. Don't believe me?
Have a listen: https://rumble.com/v1sbops-trump-central-casting.html
Huh. That's a lot of 'Central Casting' comments, isn't it? Do we know who he was referring to in these clips?
Was Pence part of central casting? If so, did he deviate from the role he was to play in the movie Or did he stick to the script?
I believe he is/was. Think about it. If he "did the right thing" optics would have been crap, and there's no way we'd be able to expose the crooks the way we have been since fake inaugurated mr Potatohead got in.
so i h ave a question guys, do you think right now Trumps SS detial thinks hes the current president?