Son. You seem to have somehow accidentally wandered onto the playing field with your hot dog and Bud light. Clearly your attitude seems to be that everything you've never read is bs. That's not how it works around here.
did u really ban him for a week? LUL, but - and its happened to me from drunk posting, but i gotta say i think the ability to even have this conversation is more important than not letting someone voice their opinion? seems like hes truly trying to figure this out.
Hes banned for a week for expressing his perspective and not liking the video. The message is clear and purposeful. Get in line, say the things, like the things, carry the water and do not ask questions or have any identity outside of the proscribed lines. You are utterly expendable and have no value to the "community", in the traditional or normal meaning of that word.
dude, you need to chill with the banhammer. You would be pissed if someone banned you for disagreeing and it's just plain fascist, (even if you pay the bills around here)
Post Edit: GAW = the bastion of American values and free speech, and I get 4 downvotes for trying to defend Free speech . . .
How do you explain the resident renewing Trump's EO's? Do you have any sauce other than personal opinion? Love or hate Derek Johnson but he isn't just talking out has arse, he has solid theories with statutes to support them
Did I say Johnsons conclusions were correct (rhetorical question) You may want to educate yourself and study up on logic and critical thinking. Putting words in someone's mouth is such a liberal thing to do..
Let's recap: I did say he wasn't just talking out his ass and his theories (<-- Crucial word to my context) seemed solid because he had statues to support them.
Without looking at the particular EO's, I'll just say that just because Trump likes steak for dinner, does not preclude Biden also enjoying it. Meaning that sometimes they overlap. Much of what he thinks is weird about Biden extending EO's is based on the presumption that absolute diametrical opposition is obviously employed in all and every instance. That is a matter of faith still. You have to already have made the leap. If one researched to find the answer to this question of weird EO extending they may find explanations that don't reflect "The Plan".
So what explanation is there? A candidate runs on the idea that they're the antithesis of their predecessor and then immediately upon taking office they start verbatim renewing EOs of their predecessor?
Walk me through an alternative explanation, because even in my most charitable mindset I can't think of one!
Most executive orders are not about policy disagreements
Lots of them are don't even originate with the President, but they are a way of the President following a law passed by Congress
Which is to say the an executive order is the executive branch executing a law.
An EO becomes the published rules for the law and gets published in the Federal Register.
There's plenty of examples of executive orders agreeing with previous policy and extending it. For example Trump extended sanctions against North Korea and Venezuela in his first year, these built on executive orders levying sanctions.
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in order to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13692 of March 8, 2015,
One pol can be the "antithesis" of another, but still overlap on tons of things. That can be an explanation. I don't know that it is. Just keeping an open and honest mind and trying to think about it without any religiosity.
He is repeating parts of the "solid theories" developed and popularized by someone else and sharing some of that persons foundational research.
Hopefully this video will inspire people to go to the original source who does NOT conflate guesses with facts.
This is a topic that's faaar too complex to be understood and vetted via a video lecture. That's why the originator researcher and populizer of the Devolution Theory uses articles with links to his many primary sources.
Guesses based on some facts are still guesses. As Q warned, these guesses should be clearly identified as guesses in order to avoid confusion and to avoid providing our adversaries with smear fodder.
Hopefully Qs warnings will be heeded so the consequences Q warned of are avoided.
Personally, I don't call Derek and his fans trolls since I'm not a mind reader so I can't know what their motivations are.
Instead, for DJ fans who are sincerely curious about the Devolution Theory I prefer encouraging them to go to the original source and read Patel Patriots detailed and meticulously sourced 33 articles that lays out what's now known as the Devolution Theory.
I'm puzzled why Derek isn't doing this too. Hopefully he will start doing so asap.
Not facts he talking out his ass sorry none of his other videos were true like his posting from the new GITMO
Son. You seem to have somehow accidentally wandered onto the playing field with your hot dog and Bud light. Clearly your attitude seems to be that everything you've never read is bs. That's not how it works around here.
Here, take a week off to get caught up.
https://www.devolution.link
There will be a quiz...
did u really ban him for a week? LUL, but - and its happened to me from drunk posting, but i gotta say i think the ability to even have this conversation is more important than not letting someone voice their opinion? seems like hes truly trying to figure this out.
Hes banned for a week for expressing his perspective and not liking the video. The message is clear and purposeful. Get in line, say the things, like the things, carry the water and do not ask questions or have any identity outside of the proscribed lines. You are utterly expendable and have no value to the "community", in the traditional or normal meaning of that word.
WWG1WGA
dude, you need to chill with the banhammer. You would be pissed if someone banned you for disagreeing and it's just plain fascist, (even if you pay the bills around here)
Post Edit: GAW = the bastion of American values and free speech, and I get 4 downvotes for trying to defend Free speech . . .
Yeah. Unban the guy. We don’t benefit from being in an echo chamber. We are better than this.
Smashing with facts way better than banhammer.
Truth is a lion. Let the fool's foolishness stand exposed. Are we for free speech or not? This is queer.
How do you explain the resident renewing Trump's EO's? Do you have any sauce other than personal opinion? Love or hate Derek Johnson but he isn't just talking out has arse, he has solid theories with statutes to support them
The EO's are real but that doesn't mean all of Johnson's conclusions are necessarily correct.
Did I say Johnsons conclusions were correct (rhetorical question) You may want to educate yourself and study up on logic and critical thinking. Putting words in someone's mouth is such a liberal thing to do..
Let's recap: I did say he wasn't just talking out his ass and his theories (<-- Crucial word to my context) seemed solid because he had statues to support them.
Without looking at the particular EO's, I'll just say that just because Trump likes steak for dinner, does not preclude Biden also enjoying it. Meaning that sometimes they overlap. Much of what he thinks is weird about Biden extending EO's is based on the presumption that absolute diametrical opposition is obviously employed in all and every instance. That is a matter of faith still. You have to already have made the leap. If one researched to find the answer to this question of weird EO extending they may find explanations that don't reflect "The Plan".
So what explanation is there? A candidate runs on the idea that they're the antithesis of their predecessor and then immediately upon taking office they start verbatim renewing EOs of their predecessor?
Walk me through an alternative explanation, because even in my most charitable mindset I can't think of one!
The same way Trump didn’t remove every policy made under Obama. It’s not hard to conceive Biden doing the same with some of Trumps policies.
Most executive orders are commonplace.
Most executive orders are not about policy disagreements
Lots of them are don't even originate with the President, but they are a way of the President following a law passed by Congress
Which is to say the an executive order is the executive branch executing a law.
An EO becomes the published rules for the law and gets published in the Federal Register.
There's plenty of examples of executive orders agreeing with previous policy and extending it. For example Trump extended sanctions against North Korea and Venezuela in his first year, these built on executive orders levying sanctions.
This Trump EO, built on a 2015 Obama EO https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/08/29/2017-18468/imposing-additional-sanctions-with-respect-to-the-situation-in-venezuela
This Trump EO builds on a 2008 Bush EO and references 3 under Obama https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/09/25/2017-20647/imposing-additional-sanctions-with-respect-to-north-korea
One pol can be the "antithesis" of another, but still overlap on tons of things. That can be an explanation. I don't know that it is. Just keeping an open and honest mind and trying to think about it without any religiosity.
He would never continue an EO on election fraud that hurts the DEMONrats.
Unless he believes it won't hurt dems. Or that it may hurt but be worth it? I don't know, of course. Just a possibility
Three orders make no sense to renew.
Did you even listen?
He is repeating parts of the "solid theories" developed and popularized by someone else and sharing some of that persons foundational research.
Hopefully this video will inspire people to go to the original source who does NOT conflate guesses with facts.
This is a topic that's faaar too complex to be understood and vetted via a video lecture. That's why the originator researcher and populizer of the Devolution Theory uses articles with links to his many primary sources.
Talking out if his ass by giving verifiable facts?
Did "Biden" reauthorize those EOs? Yup. That's a FACT. Verifable if youbarent to lazy or have your head buried.
What do you think he was making up?
Guesses based on some facts are still guesses. As Q warned, these guesses should be clearly identified as guesses in order to avoid confusion and to avoid providing our adversaries with smear fodder.
Hopefully Qs warnings will be heeded so the consequences Q warned of are avoided.
Hopefully, DJ will become more mindful asap.
It's all guesses on those of us out of the know...
Trolls are coming out of the woodwork.
Personally, I don't call Derek and his fans trolls since I'm not a mind reader so I can't know what their motivations are.
Instead, for DJ fans who are sincerely curious about the Devolution Theory I prefer encouraging them to go to the original source and read Patel Patriots detailed and meticulously sourced 33 articles that lays out what's now known as the Devolution Theory.
I'm puzzled why Derek isn't doing this too. Hopefully he will start doing so asap.
I am no mind reader. You can tell the trolls if you see when they joined and previous comments.
Lately they have been coming here like crazy.