Typos do happen. Earlier it says Feb 1964 briefing with President Lyndon B. Johnson, and the dates jump around a bit. Reads to me that it's mentioning that Rusk had made his reservations known to everyone between '62-'64, and specifically to Kennedy in '63.
Very interesting and thank you for sharing this. I haven’t downloaded from the below link, but it might help you if you’re digging further into this. I just did a simple search on the author of the material you provided, Walter Elder.
On scanning this, pages 22 and 48 (of 54) mention President Kennedy’s assassination. If they knew there was a fox in the henhouse, they would undoubtedly keep up a facade for the fox and others while holding super secret meetings with the few in the know. Either way it’s intriguing.
Was watching a documentary last weekend on Prime about JFK - solving the crime of the century.
In it, they had a Hollywood special effects guy talking about how JFK had faked his death by placing a "squib" (?? special effects device) on the side of his face, Jackie pulled the string for it, and then retrieved part of the device that flew off on to the trunk.
You see something on the Zupruder film, but honestly it could have been just shadows.
In the documentary, Hollywood guy seemed to be an apologist for the Warren commission (they looked at all the evidence, but didn't know about squibs. They did their job). Seemed like b.s. propaganda and I was ticked about time wasted watching this.
Now this document comes out about JFK and suspiciously leads one to conclude that he was faking his death.
Two separate items stating JFK faked his death.
Please don't read this as me casting aspersions on you, I'm not. I've always found you to be a straight shooter.
I find the timing curious. Is the source material being tampered with?
Something else, and this came from the RFKJ interview on Tucker. (Good interview BTW) They were discussing releasing all the JFK assassination papers. Everybody involved with it is now dead, so what is being protected? An American Institution.
Again, curious.
What did Mike Pompeo say to Trump to get him to back off and not release all papers?
And later, RFKJ just off-handedly mentions he was having dinner with Pompeo 🤯 and that Pompeo told him he regretted not doing MORE when he was at the CIA. That most of the people at the top of the CIA do not believe in America.
Not surprising about the CIA. But, what the heck is going on?
Not sure what to make of this, typo, or greatest faked death of all time, BUT if you read Bill O'Reilly's Killing Kennedy it goes into great detail about the Secret Service and Dallas police fighting over custody of the body, and the SS won. IIRC it was so heated that weapons were drawn. That situation seems less strange if a double were used and had to be removed.
Could it just be a typo that was overlooked and actually be May 28, 1963? Just saying.
Ok point taken, fren.
Date typos are highly unlikely. This is very interesting
Some kind of Government secret/sensitive document. And Date typos are unlikely on such documents
Typos do happen. Earlier it says Feb 1964 briefing with President Lyndon B. Johnson, and the dates jump around a bit. Reads to me that it's mentioning that Rusk had made his reservations known to everyone between '62-'64, and specifically to Kennedy in '63.
De date 12 September 1964 specifically reads: President John F. Kennedy.
President John F. Kennedy.
President Lyndon B. Johnson.
3 spaces more ....
Very interesting and thank you for sharing this. I haven’t downloaded from the below link, but it might help you if you’re digging further into this. I just did a simple search on the author of the material you provided, Walter Elder.
https://archive.org/details/CIA-McCone-Draft-History
On scanning this, pages 22 and 48 (of 54) mention President Kennedy’s assassination. If they knew there was a fox in the henhouse, they would undoubtedly keep up a facade for the fox and others while holding super secret meetings with the few in the know. Either way it’s intriguing.
Hold up a second Bigmike.
This is curious.
Was watching a documentary last weekend on Prime about JFK - solving the crime of the century.
In it, they had a Hollywood special effects guy talking about how JFK had faked his death by placing a "squib" (?? special effects device) on the side of his face, Jackie pulled the string for it, and then retrieved part of the device that flew off on to the trunk.
You see something on the Zupruder film, but honestly it could have been just shadows.
In the documentary, Hollywood guy seemed to be an apologist for the Warren commission (they looked at all the evidence, but didn't know about squibs. They did their job). Seemed like b.s. propaganda and I was ticked about time wasted watching this.
Now this document comes out about JFK and suspiciously leads one to conclude that he was faking his death.
Two separate items stating JFK faked his death.
Please don't read this as me casting aspersions on you, I'm not. I've always found you to be a straight shooter.
I find the timing curious. Is the source material being tampered with?
Documentary was released in 2023.
I'm glad you shared it. Ty.
Something else, and this came from the RFKJ interview on Tucker. (Good interview BTW) They were discussing releasing all the JFK assassination papers. Everybody involved with it is now dead, so what is being protected? An American Institution.
Again, curious.
What did Mike Pompeo say to Trump to get him to back off and not release all papers?
And later, RFKJ just off-handedly mentions he was having dinner with Pompeo 🤯 and that Pompeo told him he regretted not doing MORE when he was at the CIA. That most of the people at the top of the CIA do not believe in America.
Not surprising about the CIA. But, what the heck is going on?
Not sure what to make of this, typo, or greatest faked death of all time, BUT if you read Bill O'Reilly's Killing Kennedy it goes into great detail about the Secret Service and Dallas police fighting over custody of the body, and the SS won. IIRC it was so heated that weapons were drawn. That situation seems less strange if a double were used and had to be removed.