In what program, email or whatever, is the ‘save’ button and the ‘send’ button together? And even if you pressed send, you have to type in the who you’re sending it to. BS running high in that one.
"I have no dog in this fight," Alexander said as she complained about all the stress. "I am human."
"She also claimed the post was just a "dry run" of the incoming indictment.
“That was the best word that I could come up with. It was fictitious. It wasn’t real. It didn’t have a stamp on it,” Alexander said. “I tell my staff we just want to be transparent. I don’t have anything to hide."
Reminded me of 9-11-01 when that BBC reporter in NYC was talking about WTC tower 7 that “had just collapsed” but yet tower 7 hadn’t fallen yet - it was still in frame on camera behind her left shoulder as she was speaking.
Bottom line, she broke George State law, as outlined in Bill 92
*The following shall be grounds for discipline of a district attorney or solicitor-general
143 or for his or her removal or involuntary retirement from office:
144 (1) Mental or physical incapacity interfering with the performance of his or her duties
145 which is, or is likely to become, permanent; *
(2) Willful misconduct in office;
*147 (3) With respect to district attorneys, willful and persistent failure to carry out duties
148 pursuant to Code Section 15-18-6;
149 (4) With respect to solicitors-general, willful and persistent failure to carry out duties
150 pursuant to Code Section 15-18-66;
23 SB 92/CSFA
S. B. 92
7 -
151 (5) Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude; *
152 (6) Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into
153 disrepute; or
154 (7) Knowingly authorizing or permitting an assistant district attorney or assistant
155 solicitor-general to commit any act constituting grounds for removal under paragraphs (1)
156 through (6) of this subsection
the grand jury system is supposed to be totally confidential, jury member's identity are never revealed, the actual charges that she published were not even agreed by the jury until 4 or 6 hours later, the actual charges that she published were identical to the ones that were presented in court, this should be an impossibility. it shows that the entire GJ process was bastardized. Conspiracy in that she couldn't have acted alone to manipulate and corrupt the entire process.
In GA they do reveal their names if an indictments is revealed.
the grand jury system is supposed to be totally confidential
But obviously during the process people are doing paperwork. The grand jury doesn't write up indictments or the list of possible charges. The clerk is an officer of the court. She's on the inside of that confidentiality.
So is this conspiracy or incompetence?
I say never underestimate Incompetence.
the actual charges that she published were identical to the ones that were presented in court, this should be an impossibility.
They would have known the proposed charges against Trump and every other defendant before they called the grand jury in to vote. These documents were probably prepared for all 19 people before the weekend.
Before the grand jury votes. These are proposed charges. It was not the final version/authenticated version. The case number actually got assigned to another case.
It's like a draft. My company has a system for our websites, where you can put information up and other people can review and edit it, but it's not public. It's pretty common. Every so often someone screws up and actually publishes a page that shouldn't be published yet.
If the grand jury doesn't indict you can just delete the document from the system.
Or if say there's 10 charges and they only true bill on three of the charges. You can delete the other seven. The fact that they matched means the jury agreed with every proposed charge.
I saw one news report and they were saying experts thought this was not going to be a big issue
If she acted alone, it's not a conspiracy then is it?
I think she screwed up big time. She hasn't even been clerk for 2 months yet.
Because also what would be the point if she did it deliberately?
Making it public before the final vote was in. Was going to get noticed. So what was the point? How does that end up with her Not looking bad?
Here is Kash describing how the DA broke the law, he discusses this in greater detail on yesterdays X22.
So, if she broke the law and the criminal acts involved others (eg her clerk) then it follows that their shared lawbreaking must have been discussed before the crime took place. In simple terms THAT is the conspiracy, which is more than one person planning to break the law.
The software is called Odyssey and there's a media queue before final publishing
Because the media has access to documents before they are published,
Alexander used charges that pre-exist in Odyssey to test the system and conduct a trial run,” the clerk’s office said in a statement Tuesday, referencing its case management software.
So if Odyssey is used elsewhere, folks familiar with it can see if this is plausible.
This is what is informing my speculation
Legal experts said it was likely a clerical error listing charges prosecutors were planning to ask the grand jury to vote on. Prosecutors draft indictments and present them to the grand jury, which ultimately decides whether to hand charges down.
"I think this tells us what they are planning to present to the grand jury, and the grand jury could say no," said Clark Cunningham, a Georgia State University law professor. Cunningham said while the error will give Trump's legal team fodder to complain, it likely won't ultimately impact the case.
I served on my county grand jury a couple years ago. The premise is that the D.A. Shows one sided evidence to us. Our sole responsibility was to determine whether the accused civil rights were not violated. I’m sure each jurisdiction is different, but they all work on the same principle. The defendants have no defense in a grand jury setting
Imagine if the "dry run" had said they voted NOT to indict. She'd be in prison already for assisting Trump. Weird as fuck how all their "accidents" always seem to be in their favour.
They are deflecting. First they denied it was even released. Now they are saying it was an accident. Releasing it isn't the illegal part. Filing an indictment before it's even handed down by the grand jury is the illegal part. News flash. The fact that they had this ready before it was even released by the grand jury shows the entire thing was predetermined and rigged. But that don't matter. The poor black women just hit the wrong button you fucking racist.
In what program, email or whatever, is the ‘save’ button and the ‘send’ button together? And even if you pressed send, you have to type in the who you’re sending it to. BS running high in that one.
Its fucking farcical....what's worse is that the left just believe this shit...🤯
Yep, any idiot knows that. At least make up a realistic lie. C'MON MAN
"I have no dog in this fight," Alexander said as she complained about all the stress. "I am human."
"She also claimed the post was just a "dry run" of the incoming indictment.
“That was the best word that I could come up with. It was fictitious. It wasn’t real. It didn’t have a stamp on it,” Alexander said. “I tell my staff we just want to be transparent. I don’t have anything to hide."
A sham from the very beginning."
C’mon man! Ya’ll knew the outcome of the Grand Jury! You F’ed up the timing!
Reminded me of 9-11-01 when that BBC reporter in NYC was talking about WTC tower 7 that “had just collapsed” but yet tower 7 hadn’t fallen yet - it was still in frame on camera behind her left shoulder as she was speaking.
All that money the DOD had lost. The records were in building 7. Ole Rumsfeld lucked out from being filleted.
Indeed!
Busted, as we used to say.
Then let's have a look at all your emails and texts
Bottom line, she broke George State law, as outlined in Bill 92
*The following shall be grounds for discipline of a district attorney or solicitor-general 143 or for his or her removal or involuntary retirement from office: 144 (1) Mental or physical incapacity interfering with the performance of his or her duties 145 which is, or is likely to become, permanent; *
(2) Willful misconduct in office;
*147 (3) With respect to district attorneys, willful and persistent failure to carry out duties 148 pursuant to Code Section 15-18-6; 149 (4) With respect to solicitors-general, willful and persistent failure to carry out duties 150 pursuant to Code Section 15-18-66; 23 SB 92/CSFA S. B. 92
152 (6) Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into 153 disrepute ; or 154 (7) Knowingly authorizing or permitting an assistant district attorney or assistant 155 solicitor-general to commit any act constituting grounds for removal under paragraphs (1) 156 through (6) of this subsection
https://www.onlineathens.com/story/news/state/2023/05/07/georgia-gov-brian-kemp-signs-sb-92-prosecutor-oversight-commission/70192160007/
Criminal idiot
Now THAT is clear evidence of a Real, Authentic Conspiracy, no theories, just published facts in the public domain, of their criminality.
Hi, what's the actual conspiracy?
the grand jury system is supposed to be totally confidential, jury member's identity are never revealed, the actual charges that she published were not even agreed by the jury until 4 or 6 hours later, the actual charges that she published were identical to the ones that were presented in court, this should be an impossibility. it shows that the entire GJ process was bastardized. Conspiracy in that she couldn't have acted alone to manipulate and corrupt the entire process.
In GA they do reveal their names if an indictments is revealed.
But obviously during the process people are doing paperwork. The grand jury doesn't write up indictments or the list of possible charges. The clerk is an officer of the court. She's on the inside of that confidentiality.
So is this conspiracy or incompetence?
I say never underestimate Incompetence.
They would have known the proposed charges against Trump and every other defendant before they called the grand jury in to vote. These documents were probably prepared for all 19 people before the weekend.
Before the grand jury votes. These are proposed charges. It was not the final version/authenticated version. The case number actually got assigned to another case.
It's like a draft. My company has a system for our websites, where you can put information up and other people can review and edit it, but it's not public. It's pretty common. Every so often someone screws up and actually publishes a page that shouldn't be published yet.
If the grand jury doesn't indict you can just delete the document from the system.
Or if say there's 10 charges and they only true bill on three of the charges. You can delete the other seven. The fact that they matched means the jury agreed with every proposed charge.
I saw one news report and they were saying experts thought this was not going to be a big issue
If she acted alone, it's not a conspiracy then is it?
I think she screwed up big time. She hasn't even been clerk for 2 months yet.
Because also what would be the point if she did it deliberately?
Making it public before the final vote was in. Was going to get noticed. So what was the point? How does that end up with her Not looking bad?
Screw up makes the most sense to me
Here is Kash describing how the DA broke the law, he discusses this in greater detail on yesterdays X22. So, if she broke the law and the criminal acts involved others (eg her clerk) then it follows that their shared lawbreaking must have been discussed before the crime took place. In simple terms THAT is the conspiracy, which is more than one person planning to break the law.
https://twitter.com/TheStormRedux/status/1691818488094961971
I would say it's a very big IF.
So, you think the DA acted alone ?
I'm saying If she broke the law is a very big if.
https://nypost.com/2023/08/15/fulton-county-clerks-office-mishap-led-to-early-release-of-trump-indictment/
Two interesting points.
The software is called Odyssey and there's a media queue before final publishing
So if Odyssey is used elsewhere, folks familiar with it can see if this is plausible.
This is what is informing my speculation
"I think this tells us what they are planning to present to the grand jury, and the grand jury could say no," said Clark Cunningham, a Georgia State University law professor. Cunningham said while the error will give Trump's legal team fodder to complain, it likely won't ultimately impact the case.
I served on my county grand jury a couple years ago. The premise is that the D.A. Shows one sided evidence to us. Our sole responsibility was to determine whether the accused civil rights were not violated. I’m sure each jurisdiction is different, but they all work on the same principle. The defendants have no defense in a grand jury setting
Oh the smell of BS in the morning.
Imagine if the "dry run" had said they voted NOT to indict. She'd be in prison already for assisting Trump. Weird as fuck how all their "accidents" always seem to be in their favour.
The dry run is the proposed charges, not the Indictment.
If the grand jury returns a no true bill you would just delete the document.
If they returned a no true bill on some of the charges, you would delete those charges they didn't indict on.
What this tells us is every charge they raised to the grand jury was voted a true bill.
They are deflecting. First they denied it was even released. Now they are saying it was an accident. Releasing it isn't the illegal part. Filing an indictment before it's even handed down by the grand jury is the illegal part. News flash. The fact that they had this ready before it was even released by the grand jury shows the entire thing was predetermined and rigged. But that don't matter. The poor black women just hit the wrong button you fucking racist.
I guesS the SAVE BUTTON AND SEND BUTTON ARE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER????
Just askin'!!!
(Programmer/Web Developer/Database Designer)
I wonder if Che's parents were Marxists, and named him after Guevara.
If true, I wonder if he was hired because of connections with a former classmate because colleges breed Marxists.
Che Clown World