Why doesn't the MSM want to talk about Jan Halper Hayes?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 All for a larp? 🤡
Comments (31)
sorted by:
You think they would be debunking her 1871 theory.
Quite right. They do it by bearing false witness. They are liar and deceiver from the beginning.....
I googled her name. Nothing came up about the 1871 act.
That shouldn't surprise you simply because they don't want Americans to know. It's not taught in public schools, but there it hiding in plain sight to see.
Agreed!
It's pretty clear that this is legit. If it wasn't.... The MSM would totally be debunking it.
Speaking of letting Americans know, has anyone shared this with our angry friends at Patriots.win?
I'd do it myself, but I'm busy at work.
Never been there myself.
Angry? I think you will find a lot of unhinged types on this site as well. The disparity and conflict between these two Patriot sites is unwarranted and ridiculous. There is equal value in both. I read and post on both sites and enjoy the differences in personalities immensely. Lets focus on the end goal. There is wisdom to being cautious and speculative (dooming) as well as having a strong unquestioning hero worship of the great man that Trump is, and a plan that seems to have a lot of merit and proofs, but seems to linger and drag ass .....
Agreed, we need to work together. I originally found "The Donald" about 3 years ago but I soon gravitated to this place because it's more civilized and thoughtful.
Maybe I'm jaded since I usually get down-voted when trying to enlighten folks on PDW.
No surprise. Google gets worse daily. Even liberals are starting to deplore it.
Since nobody posted the video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l0WacP1CrWY
Right! Thanx
Thank you for the tasty sauce
🫡
I have taken a break from Social for a bit. Can't wait to catch up with this.
Anyone have a link to the video mentioned, TS seems to be just a screenshot
https://truthsocial.com/@01010001/110968189530020457
There is so much has happened over the years - I am so grateful for what I’ve learned here so far, and I’m awake for sure! But how am I ever going to catch up? I want to because I know if I just had ALL the pieces of the puzzle, the victory (when it comes) would be so much sweeter! I really want to be able to fully appreciate all that’s happened, and what is coming because I believe God is behind it and it’ll be glorious.
Vote tally lines don't gap up, it's middle school algebra in the face.
She's a nobody
She is such a nobody that Trump retruthed her interview.
You think Trump knows the people he retruths?
He's a guy who loves flattery.
enlighten me with evidence of some retruths or retweets where his show of support could be deemed loose ?
Do you think Trump really knows Sunny Nguyen from Truth Social?
https://truthsocial.com/@SunnyNguyen/110963584977529527
or @FruitSnacks, or @Lara47 or @STKOLBEOFPOLAND
And, of course, loose was not what I said.
I don't have Truth account and the link didn't work for me, perhaps because I don't have an account. therefore I didn't have the opportunity to do any research. I'm not adverse to being wrong but I think Jan is huge sign that the dam is breaking.
and if Trump retruthed this not really knowing her or what she actually discussed, why hasn't the corporate media or any of his political opponents attempted to capitalize on Trump's kooky retruth ? not a single peep I'm aware from anyone suggesting trump and jan are crazy conspiracy theorists
There's a lot of news going on. Two Trump administration officials testified in criminal cases yesterday.
And going back to what I said, I don't think the MSM knows who she is. Trump just says she talks about election fraud.
I don't have a TS account either but I was able to view his account. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump Also notice that Trump's basically saying, Don Jr found this and passed along. He didn't find Jan Halper Hayes himself.
Doesn't seem like you've been paying attention.
Prior to becoming on a somebody on this community 25 days ago, she's been mentioned 3 times total on GAW. There was a total of 9 comments.
Was GAW paying attention to her in 2016 when she was saying Trump was psychologically unbalanced and or when she said this in 2017
She claimed that she gave Trump a psychological test. She claimed to be a member of Trump's transition team and 'a consultant to the Trump Transition" but she seems to have a history of exaggerating claims in the press.
She was going on multiple British TV shows claiming to be the VP of Republicans Overseas months after she left the group and they had to send her a cease and desist letter. http://republicansoverseas.com/wp-content/uploads/LettertoJanHalper-Hayes.pdf
If she was part of the Trump transition team, that should be a discoverable fact that would establish credibility.
She does have one of those donor/supporter photos with Trump. So perhaps she has some bona fides and I'm completely wrong.
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/57adfd7797f0a6b1f3e58f90c32c1284da29c786/33_52_980_1224/master/980.jpg?width=445&dpr=2&s=none
An optics play? Seems like it to me.
My main take on her is i don't think she has any insider info. She just seems like someone who got pilled. And reads sites like these.
The Vatican gold thing appeared on an extremely dubious site a few years ago. Seemed like clickbait. First they claimed it was 650 planes.....later they claimed it was spaceships.
In general, I think human tendency is if this person says something I disagree with, they can't be good.
If the person says something I agree with, well then they must really know what they are talking about.
If they say something we get excited about, we don't look into their claim much.
An example. Look how fast Democrats adopted a guy like Michael Avenatti.